What you need to know about the COP27 Loss and Damage Fund

30.11.2022 874 views

The establishment of a Loss and Damage Fund was, for many, the highlight of the United Nations Climate Conference (COP 27) and the culmination of decades of pressure from climate-vulnerable developing countries. The fund aims to provide financial assistance to nations most vulnerable and impacted by the effects of climate change.

While the historic decision was welcomed, this is but the first step, and success will depend on how quickly this fund gets off the ground. Representatives from 24 countries will work together over the next year to decide what form the fund should take, which countries should contribute, and where and how the money should be distributed.

Here are six things you should know about loss and damage and what it means for combatting the climate crisis: 

1. The term “loss and damage" dominated COP27. What does it mean exactly?

Loss and damage refers to the negative consequences that arise from the unavoidable risks of climate change, like rising sea levels, prolonged heatwaves, desertification, the acidification of the sea and extreme events, such as bushfires, species extinction and crop failures. As the climate crisis unfolds, these events will happen more and more frequently, and the consequences will become more severe.

2. Historically, G20 countries have emitted majority of the greenhouse gases driving the climate crisis. How is this impacting developing countries?

The African continent for example, contributes the least to climate change yet is the most vulnerable to its impacts. African countries that contribute so little will have to spend up to five times more on adapting to the climate crisis than on healthcare. G20 countries, meanwhile, represent around 75 per cent of global greenhouse emissions. Meanwhile, Pakistan has seen US$30 billion in damages from severe flooding but emits less than 1 per cent of global emissions. 

3. How can funds be raised or mobilized to compensate for loss and damage? 

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) research shows that finance for adaptation falls short. The 2022 Adaptation Gap Report indicates that international adaptation finance flows to developing countries are five to ten times below estimated needs, and will need over US$300 billion per year by 2030. Loss and damage finance needs are closely connected to our ability to mitigate and adapt to climate change.

Some traditional financing instruments could be used to deal with loss and damage. Social protection, contingency finance, catastrophe risk insurance and catastrophe bonds can provide a certain buffer and rapid pay-outs after disasters. However, a broadened donor base and innovative finance tools would be needed to respond to the magnitude of loss and damage.

4. What are some examples of those innovative tools?

The UN Secretary-General António Guterres, for example, has called for the use of windfall taxes on fossil fuel companies and diverting the money to people struggling with rising food and energy prices and to countries suffering loss and damage caused by the climate crisis. Others have called for debt for loss and damage swaps, international taxes and a dedicated finance facility for loss and damage under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. At COP 26 and 27 philanthropies and country governments pledged funds for loss and damage. These efforts could be scaled up considering the mounting challenges of the most vulnerable communities.

5. What is UNEP doing to combat loss and damage?

UNEP is at the forefront of producing up-to-date, accurate science and knowledge on the impact of climate change. UNEP supports countries to collect and process environmental data. UNEP's landmark studies such as the Emissions Gap Report and the Adaption Gap Report, provide critical information to policymakers around the world.

Community and ecosystem-based adaptation is critical to building resilience to the impacts of the climate crisis. UNEP is currently supporting over 50 ecosystem-based adaptation projects. These projects aim to restore around 113,000 hectares and benefit around 2.5 million people worldwide. UNEP is also supporting demand-driven technical assistance to climate information such as early warning systems and capacity building in countries such as Timor-Leste, Azerbaijan, El Salvador, Ghana, Maldives, Sudan and the Pacific island developing states.

6. Will the Loss and Damage Fund be effective?

It is important that a Loss and Damage Fund tackles the gaps that current climate finance institutions such as the Green Climate Fund do not fill. Combined adaptation and mitigation finance flows in 2020 fell at least US$17 billion short of the US$100 billion pledged to developing countries. The Transitional Committee will provide recommendations for the set up and operations of the fund. The Committee will also recommend which countries should receive funding and who should be paying into the fund. All of that needs to be decided upon.

But for the fund to be effective, the root cause of climate change must be tackled – and that involves reducing emissions. Unless emissions are drastically reduced, more and more countries will face the devastating effects of climate change. The world urgently needs to find more resources for mitigation, adaptation and loss and damage so that climate change will not erode humanity's chances to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals.

Source - https://www.unep.org

28.04.2026

Philippines seeks 500 million USD for engineered bamboo development

The project is currently at the concept stage, with feasibility studies expected to take five to six months and overall preparation about a year. Implementation could begin in 2027, pending loan approval.

28.04.2026

Insurance compensation of 186,000 manats paid to tobacco farmers in Azerbaijan

To date, 186,000 manats of insurance compensation have been paid to farmers and farms in the tobacco industry in Azerbaijan.

28.04.2026

USA - Climate Disasters Are Straining Hawaii’s Insurance System

Frequent and costly disasters are driving up premiums and leaving many properties uninsured or underinsured. 

28.04.2026

Brazil - São Paulo releases R$400 million in rural credit in a record package for farmers, agricultural insurance, machinery, and land regularization

The package announced at Agrishow in Ribeirão Preto combines rural credit, agricultural insurance, land tenure regularization, mechanization, inclusion of women, innovation, and environmental actions, with R$ 455 million in investments aimed at strengthening São Paulo’s agribusiness.

28.04.2026

When will Moldovan authorities announce a call for applications for subsidizing agrarian insurance?

To date, the MAIA Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry has not yet announced the start of the next stage of accepting applications for subsidies under agricultural risk insurance contracts concluded in the fall and winter period. While waiting for this announcement, some insurance companies are being "restrained" in the agricultural segment - they insure only livestock farms and perennial crop plantations of their regular customers.

28.04.2026

USA - USDA just doubled disaster payments, and gave farmers until August 12

SDRP disaster payment farmers 2026 just got a major upgrade. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced on April 24 in Higginsville, Missouri that USDA is raising the Supplemental Disaster Relief Program payment factor from 35 percent to 70 percent. 

27.04.2026

India - Crop Ruined by Parrots is 'Damage by Wild Animals', says HC; Gives Relief

Holding that citizens cannot be forced to bear losses caused by protected wild animals, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has ruled that denying compensation to a farmer merely because parrots were omitted from a government list would breach principles of equality. 

27.04.2026

The World Bank: Agri-risk management in Bulgaria

CAP has steered Bulgarian agriculture toward greater resilience, but the sector continues to suffer from an absence of a comprehensive risk management strategy and limited research on internal and external risks, the report concludes.