NEWS
775
of 1159
News
27.09.2016

Ireland - IFA calls for five point plan for weather-hit farmers

IFA president Joe Healy has called on the government to implement a package of measures to support farmers, particularly tillage farmers, in areas of the country hit by difficult weather conditions. Healy and the IFA has called for on the government to implement a five point plan to help address the difficult situation on many farms this autumn. Healy's demands include: A crisis aid package for tillage farmers who have suffered serious crop losses A fodder Scheme for farmers unable to save enough hay or silage A relaxation of the qualifying criteria for the Farm Assist programme An extension of the slurry spreading deadline And prompt and on time payment of all farm schemes this year All across the country, many tillage farmers are facing into the reality of heavy crop losses following a very difficult spell of weather around harvest time preventing them from harvesting crops this year. Similarly, in parts of the west and north west many farmers have been unable to save the required amounts of fodder to see them through the winter period and Healy is calling for a fodder scheme to address this shortfall. The IFA says it has asked Teagasc to carry out an assessment of the fodder deficit among farmers affected and also to ascertain the level of crop losses suffered by some tillage farmers this year. Healy said the Department of Agriculture must deliver all scheme payments on time this October as it is critically important farmers receive payments on time this year to tackle the severe cashflow issues on many farms. “The harsh reality on almost all farms this year is that the direct payment is the only net income coming into the family household from farming,” said Healy. Source - http://www.farmersjournal.ie

26.09.2016

USA - Suspected dicamba damage begins to come into focus for Bootheel soy farmers

Worries about this year’s soybean harvest in the Missouri Bootheel are no longer just projections. They’re reality. As the harvest gets underway, some farmers in the state’s southeastern corner are beginning to get a better understanding of the financial losses they face from crop damage believed to be caused by illegal use of unauthorized or “off-label” varieties of the herbicide dicamba. Though harvest won’t reach its peak until early to mid-October, initial indications paint a painful picture for yields. Mark Beaird, a soybean farmer near Parma, Mo., has harvested roughly a quarter of his 1,500 acres so far. In those areas, he says he’s lost about a third of his crop compared to past yields, mustering 40-odd bushels per acre in fields that normally produce 65 to 75 an acre. With soybeans able to fetch close to $10 per bushel, Beaird says his losses approach $250 an acre. Multiply that by the nearly 400 acres harvested at this point and Beaird’s financial shortfall is just shy of six figures already, with more losses expected to follow. “I’m scared to get into the numbers, really,” Beaird said. “We’re gonna be out a lot of money, I know that. And we started off with about as perfect a season as you can start off with.” But things took a turn for the worse in late June and July, when complaints of crop damage skyrocketed across the Bootheel. In just over a one-month stretch, more than 100 incidents of suspected herbicide drift were reported from four Bootheel counties alone, surpassing the usual statewide total for an entire year. The cases, which remain under investigation by the Missouri Department of Agriculture, are thought by many to have been triggered by widespread, illegal usage of dicamba. The herbicide is highly volatile, especially in hot weather, tending to vaporize into a gas and drift across wide areas. For non-GMO soybeans and other crops, contact with even low concentrations of dicamba can be harmful. Soybean leaves, for instance, can become cupped and yellow after dicamba exposure. Meanwhile, Missouri’s largest peach farm, situated in the area, may lose half its trees to similar leaf damage from suspected drift. Though the herbicide is not new, it seems to have gained newfound popularity after this year’s release of dicamba-resistant soybeans — known as Roundup Ready 2 Xtend soybeans — by Creve Coeur-based seed company Monsanto. But Monsanto’s form of dicamba meant to be applied to Xtend seeds was not released, as it has yet to be approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The unreleased dicamba variety would supposedly be less volatile, but many believe its absence led some growers with dicamba-resistant crops to spray older, “off-label” forms of the herbicide, leaving their fields unharmed but jeopardizing others Even though clear warnings forbid use of unauthorized dicamba substitutes, Beaird believes that rule-breaking was inevitable, especially with insufficient fines in place for wrongdoers. “I think the seed company is partially responsible because they put the seed out there without the chemical,” Beaird said. “It’s like putting the carrot in front of the horse’s nose.” Things may improve slightly for Beaird going forward. The early plantings he’s already harvested are the ones that he says got hit the worst, catching multiple “whiffs” of drift, while other beans may have only been affected once or twice. He says this year’s crop damage didn’t just hurt his yields, but also caused him to spend more time and money than ever before on weed control. “When dicamba hit the beans they just about stopped growing,” said Beaird, explaining that the slowed growth meant they couldn’t shade out weeds. “The next thing you know you got another crop of weeds you wouldn’t have had.” Beaird is not alone. Other soybean farmers are reporting similar, or even worse, crop losses. And many yet to harvest are nervously waiting to learn the price tag associated with their own damage. “They’re definitely damaged, I just don’t know to what extent,” said Ted Rouse, another area soybean farmer. “Until I get ’em threshed, I won’t have a whole lot of information.” Insurance companies have indicated that they won’t compensate farmers for losses from illegal herbicide usage. And while many are preparing for lawsuits to recover damages, Beaird worries that legal disputes won’t be resolved in time to save some farmers from going out of business this year. Looking ahead to next year, Beaird says he’ll have to hedge his bets and switch to dicamba-resistant seeds. He says he needs assurance that he won’t be a victim of suspected dicamba use again as he tries to work toward retirement. “When you get my age, you’re trying to get money together so you can quit,” says Beaird, who turns 56 next month. “I worked this year for nothing, put it that way.” Source - http://www.stltoday.com

26.09.2016

Australia - Insurance Council declares damage in Forbes a catastrophe

The Insurance Council of Australia has declared the flooding occurring in the sodden central-west NSW town of Forbes and surrounding areas a catastrophe, indicating the damage from the disaster is likely to cost local businesses owners and residents tens of millions of dollars. The news comes as locals brace themselves for another 40-50mm of rain later in the week, which could cause further damage. A major flood warning is still in place for the Lachlan River, which peaked overnight at 10.67m, slightly higher than the area’s last major flood event in August 1990. The river is expected to stay elevated for several days. Premier Mike Baird visited Forbes today with Minister for Emergency Services David Elliot and praised the “resilient” community. “They’ve seen floods before. They know it can be difficult but they are determined to help each other get through it,” he said. “ “In terms of the briefings we had, it’s clear there is more rain coming. That’s obviously bad news. It’s not clear whether there will significant additional rising but there certainly is a risk of more rising water. That is something we need to be prepared for on the ground here,” he said. He said the event would likely be classified a natural disaster which would unlock additional funding assistance for those affected. “We’ve announced Dave Owens as co-ordinator for the recovery and clearly we’ve still got a few days to get through yet. But clearly as recovery goes through we will ask him specifically to look at how insurers are operating and working with the local community,” said Mr Baird. The Insurance Council of Australia CEO Rob Whelan said the insurance industry has escalated its response to help policyholders in Forbes and the central-west. “Early reports indicate the region has suffered extensive crop losses, while about 100 businesses and homes may also have been affected by flooding,” Mr Whelan said. “It’s likely that insurance losses will be in the tens of millions of dollars. However, it will take several weeks for the full extent of the losses to be known. He said it is yet to be determined how many farmers had purchased policies which covered damage to crops, but advised that insurers will use independent hydrologists to determine if the losses “can be covered under other provisions of their policies” The SES continue to stress the floodwaters are behaving differently to those that have affected the town in the past, and have advised locals to keep their eye on the weather as conditions change. Forbes locals say the water normally flows through town, dividing it in two, but this event has seen floodwaters flow into areas previously thought safe. Condoblin and surrounding areas are set to be the next hit by floodwaters, with the river at the small town expected to peak around Friday at 7.3m, which is classified as major flooding. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="650"] Jo Rugg and Matt Robb resort to their dinghy for transport along the Lachlan Valley Way in Forbes. Picture: Ryan Osland[/caption] Years to recover from floods Farmers and homeowners across central western NSW fear it will take them years to recover from devastating floods that have swept the region, with further rains expected within days and emergency services preparing to remain in place for weeks. Hundreds of people living in and around the towns of Forbes and Condobolin have already been forced from their homes by the rising water, and hundreds more residents could be evac­uated in the coming days. More than 100 properties in the towns have been damaged, and millions of dollars worth of crops may have been ruined. With NSW Premier Mike Baird due to visit Forbes today to assess the damage, the State Emergency Service yesterday said it had performed 96 rescues, and would need to continue its operations in the area until ­November. About 230 emergency services personnel have so far been ­deployed to Forbes, population 8000, with the SES organising resupply operations for those in ­isolated farms and other properties after floodwaters cut across several roads within the Lachlan River catchment. The army has also sent five high-clearance trucks and soldiers from the 5th Brigade to help those trapped. Locals Jo Rugg and Matt Robb got out the dinghy, cracked a couple of beers, and drifted down the street as they tried to put a positive spin on the situation. “There’s not much you can do about it so you just have to go with it,” Ms Rugg said. The couple said Defence Force members from Sydney had brought army trucks to their street and had helped their neighbours move possessions. While many farmers have been unable even to begin assessing the damage done to stocks and crops, local resident Gavin Montgomery said it would take years for those who live here to recover. “There are people who have lost entire crops. These people have lost so much, and they are farmers who have been here a long time,” he said. “They’ve invested money to get land ready for the summer crops. There is a window for planting things like cotton, it has to be planted by early October but now they won’t be able to get tractors and machinery on the land.” The rising waters, which in Forbes yesterday exceeded the 10.65m level reached in the 1990 floods when 132 properties were swamped, have also proved difficult to predict. “It depends on what happens with the rainfall and how it impacts on the river system,” SES spokeswoman Sue Pritchard said. “We are rostering our people across for next month or so, the state is so saturated, and dams are all full.” Brie Roylance, a mother of three whose family abandoned their shop in the town centre on Saturday night, said it would take months before they were back on their feet. “Many of our customers are from the farming community so while the town might be OK, lots of farmers can’t get on with their crops,’’ Ms Roylance, who runs a local mechanic workshop, said. “It’s a domino effect when you are in business especially. Local snake catcher Paul Newcombe spent yesterday responding to calls from the community. “(The snakes) have been pretty subdued, they are on the edge of floodwater, tied up in a fence, wrapped around a tree. I just pull them off a tree and find somewhere dry and let them go,” he said after pulling a red-bellied black snake from floodwaters. He hasn’t let people pay him for him services this week. “I’m just helping out. We all pull ­together here,” Mr Newcombe said. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="650"] Forbes snake catcher Paul Newcombe is in demand. Picture: Dylan Robinson[/caption] The owners of more than 100 properties at Ungarie, about 140km southwest of Forbes, have also been ordered to leave. A further evacuation warning has been issued for 20 properties in Condobolin, about 100km west from Forbes along the Lachlan River. Source - http://www.theaustralian.com.au

26.09.2016

USA - Too much rain is slowing harvest of Wisconsin potatoes

“Up until two weeks ago, growing conditions were quite nice, but we are struggling through a very warm and wet September to get the remainder of the crop harvested and put in storage,” said Andy Diercks of Coloma Farms. “The normal weather in Wisconsin presents enough challenges for growers with warm nights and high humidity, which contribute to increased risk of pest and disease pressure, like late blight. There was some limited late blight in the state this year but it shouldn’t present any issues for most growers. However, the heavy rains most areas have received over the past three weeks certainly may contribute to some storage challenges.” “Right now, the grower returns are above our cost of production, but there is mounting pressure for prices to go down. The problem is how quickly the market responds to any news of a big crop, especially in Idaho. Both the yields and the tuber size of the crop in Idaho are larger than expected, so the nearly immediate reaction is to lower prices in hopes of moving more product into the market,” added Diercks. “In Wisconsin, we have a very manageable crop due to the good growing conditions so we’ll do the best we can to keep regional prices above cost of production.” Source - http://www.freshplaza.com

26.09.2016

Panama - Winds destroy banana crops

A significant portion of Panama’s banana cultivation has been damaged by winds that pummeled the country’s Atlantic coast near the Costa Rican border last week. Atlantic Banana Cooperative (Coobana) labor director Chito Quintero said the wind and rain hit the Bocas del Toro region on Sept. 21. “For every hectare planted there are 2,000 plants, of which the wind put down 150 plants per hectare,” Quintero said. Coobana itself has around 550 hectares of Fairtrade-certified banana production, and Quintero expects to record losses in the order of US$2.5 million. The main destinations for the cooperative are England, Switzerland, Italy and New Zealand. “The winds have calmed down and the days are normal now,” Quintero added. The representative said there were initiatives in place for growers to insure their farms, however due to the high premiums no member of Coobana had insurance. He said the main result would be a rise in banana prices and fewer shipments overseas. “We will end up exporting five containers per week. We were exporting 20 containers per week,” he said. Source - http://www.freshfruitportal.com

26.09.2016

Philippines - Sec. Piñol tells farmers to avail of PCIC insurance coverage vs calamities

Department of Agriculture Sec. Emmanuel Piñol urged farmers in North and South Cotabato to avail of the insurance services of the Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation (PCIC) to avoid getting empty handed when calamity strikes. Piñol made the appeal after farmers in Tantangan and Norala, both in South Cotabato and M’lang in North Cotabato sought help from him through the social media after strong winds damaged last week the soon to be harvested palay. Piñol said disasters strike anytime and it is best for farmers to have their crops insured before PCIC so they can recover from losses. “Disasters like this could happen to a farmer’s life which is why we really encourage our farmers to join the crop insurance program of the government,” Piñol said. “I know that PCIC is not known yet to the Filipino farmers so under the administration of President Rody Duterte, I have instructed its officials to conduct a nationwide campaign to insure the Filipino farmers,” he added. North and South Cotabato belonged to SOCCSKSARGEN region or Region 12, the number 1 rice producer in Mindanao. It is also composed of the provinces of Sultan Kudarat, Sarangani and the cities of Cotabato, Kidapawan, Koronadal, Tacurong and Gen. Santos. Source - http://www.mb.com.ph

26.09.2016

Spain - Drought causes 165 million Euro loss in Valencia

LA UNIÓ de Llauradors has estimated that the severe drought in Valencia has already caused direct losses in the agricultural sector worth around 165 million Euro (88.8 in the province of Valencia, 40.3 in Alicante and 35.5 in Castellon), according to a report prepared by the agricultural organization; a figure that may actually be significantly higher if it does not rain in the coming weeks. The impact of drought changes, depending on whether the lands are rainfed or irrigated. In the latter case, the main problem is rising production costs (more water for irrigation, more treatments against pests, additional work for the fruit thinning, etc.). In rainfed areas, the problems are not limited solely to the reduction of the production, which in some cases will exceed 50%, but could also have long-term consequences, such as the death of trees. Drought causes, among other things, phenological imbalances in most crops, the production of smaller calibres and even a possible loss of trees. It also leads to a higher risk for pests, with the high cost associated in their eradication, the need to increase the frequency of irrigation and the consequent rise in energy costs, as well as a decline in aquifer levels and the salinisation of irrigation wells. The combination of the absence of rainfall, the high temperatures in recent months and drought have taken a very negative toll on our crops, and this will have a direct impact on the growers' incomes. Due to their considerable acreage, production volume and economic value, citrus crops are recording the greatest losses, totalling 95 million Euro. This is mostly the result of the increased production costs, the higher frequency of irrigation, the need for more frequent phytosanitary treatments and the need for thinnings to be able to obtain larger calibre fruits. The production of nuts will also be greatly affected by the impact of drought. Thus, the almond harvest could fall by almost 40% compared to the previous season. The losses recorded by these crops will total 13.6 million Euro. As regards fruit, including kakis, the impact is similar to that of citrus; i.e., higher costs due to costlier irrigation and phytosanitary treatments. LA UNIÓ has estimated the losses at 3.7 million Euro. The vegetable production will also be affected by increased costs and lower quality. LA UNIÓ believes that this dramatic and distressing situation requires an effort from both the central and regional governments to compensate for the losses and prevent the abandonment of most farms. Source - http://www.freshplaza.com

23.09.2016

USA - Crop insurance is aiding and abetting a crime

Farmer Jones has 20 acres along the Raccoon River in the Conservation Reserve Program. The hill is planted in native grass, which pretty well soaked up a four-inch rain last Thursday. Across the river, Old McDonald planted soybeans along similar topography, with a hill sloping toward flatland along the river. The field was submerged and, no doubt, covered by Federal Crop Insurance. Current was washing soil into the roil, right on down to Des Moines and, ultimately, the coastal marshes are the mouth of the Mississippi. It’s criminal. “You and I are on the same page,” said Iowa State University agronomist Dr. Rick Cruse, who manages the Iowa Daily Erosion Project. Cruse’s web page shows that the rain displaced anywhere from a third of a ton to three-quarters of a ton per acre, discharging that phosphorous- and nitrogen-laden soil to the Raccoon, the Cedar and the Maple rivers. Cruse has no idea how many acres of insured crops are planted in effectively river bottom that floods more and more as climate change brings wilder weather. Count it in the thousands just in Buena Vista County, where the tiller knows no boundaries — such as fence lines, river banks or road ditches. My father sold Federal Crop Insurance for a living. He was the top salesman in the country three years in a row. “The only thing Federal Crop doesn’t insure against is bad farming,” New Dealer Dad preached time and again. Until they put the hail companies in charge of the chicken coop. Now bad farming is part of farming the program. You plant crops in that bottom for 10 years. You have a crop history. You get flooded out half the time, but the half of the time it’s dry you might fetch 60-bushel beans and 250-bushel corn. So you make a calculated bet, insured by the taxpayer. The taxpayer gets nothing in return. No conservation plans. No grass buffers. Not even a wood chip bioreactor. Just beans into the river, and a US debit to that fine man sitting next to you in church on Sunday. Which is all fine with Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, our two US Senators. They wrote a letter to Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack last week complaining that CRP rates are so attractive they are keeping young farmers out of the business. A sober analysis will tell you that CRP rates in BV County are slightly under what the market could command. Farmer Jones could find a sucker — perhaps Old McDonald — to rent that land for $300 per acre and work the 20 acres with a 12-row cornhead this fall. Farmer Jones could have made more money with a straight cash rent. But he likes wildlife. He might lay in a few feeder calves on those acres if CRP rules would allow him. He might even take a lower government rent if he could. But he is happy to get his CRP check, and now that the place is planted in native grass, he never has to worry about it for the life of the contract. His deer and ducks are going across the river and eating Old McDonald’s faltering crop. We could tie crop insurance to conservation compliance. But we won’t. Ernst is opposed to increasing CRP acres. The House Agriculture Committee wants to eliminate the Conservation Security Program and the Environmental Quality Incentives program aimed at livestock producers. Ahead of a new farm bill debate next year, the incumbent Republicans already have set up a contest between conservation funding and crop insurance. One wins, one will lose. Crop insurance will win. Corn probably will be under water next year. It’s called farming the program. Bad farming is part of the formula to financial success. Until we back off the lake, river and ditch banks we have no business talking about a multi-billion state water quality fund. In fact, we continue to encourage bad farming by propping up crop insurance over conservation. The bad actors are set up to win the debate in the next farm bill based on specious arguments — if CRP is outbidding a farmer, then that so-called farmer is in the wrong business. He should take up driving a truck or learn computer coding. Source - http://stormlake.com

23.09.2016

USA - Grains, cotton rise as rains erode crop hopes

Is the US corn and soybean crop, after sailing over all other hurdles so far this year, going to trip up at the last one? The spring sowing period went so smoothly, as underlined by low levels of so-called "prevent plant" insurance claims, that investors are expecting the US Department of Agriculture to upgrade its forecasts for, already large, seeded area of the crops. And the summer growing season, well, the historically strong crop condition ratings from the USDA bear witness to how favourable it was. (Although whether corn crops really have such productive potential is a bit of a bone of contention – see below.) But with the finish in sight, the harvest is proving less benign, in terms of wet weather which, while helpful for growing plants, is not such a boon for ready-to-harvest crops. 'Market on edge' "The market is becoming increasingly worried about wet US weather and the harvest delays that might ensue," said Tobin Gorey at Commonwealth Bank of Australia. "A wet US crop outlook has the market on edge." The initial problem is the delay to fieldwork, harvesting and so new-crop supplies of grain - an issue in particular for soybeans, with US stocks of the oilseed not as strong as had been thought, with the USDA last week slashing its estimate for domestic inventories below 200m bushels. "Additional moisture will create more delays in harvest and vessels are lined up at the Gulf and Pacific North West awaiting new crop beans," said Benson Quinn Commodities 'Traders are nervous' However, there is the trouble too that persistent wetness promotes quality loss and disease too on ripe crops. "Wet weather has been a consistent presence across most of the country," said Joe Lardy at US broker CHS Hedging. "Reports of diplodia in corn have been popping up with a bit more frequency," referring to corn stalk rot, a fungal disease encouraged by damp conditions. Indeed, on disease, it is corn, which is generally further through its development process, on which concerns are most concentrated. "Traders are nervous the unwanted moisture will increase disease/quality problems," said Terry Reilly at Futures International, noting the worries over "too much rain" over parts of the Corn Belt. "Shelton, Nebraska saw over 6 inches of rain Thursday into Friday." 'Not as good as expected' And this at a time when doubts were already emerging that the corn harvest would prove quite as huge as forecast by the USDA, and suggested by the proportion of crop rated by official scouts as in "good" or "excellent" condition. "Big expectations are being maintained for the incoming soy yield but mixed results starting to pop up on the corn side - from exceptional to disappointing due to disease and grain fill weather," said ag advisory group Water Street Solutions. "The market this coming week will be listening closely for yield data as the weather opens up." Benson Quinn Commodities flagged "continued chatter of smaller kernel depth", adding that yield results, while "decent" appeared to be coming in "not as good as expected". 'Disease risks elevated' Of course it is still early days in harvest terms, with harvest just 5% complete as of Sunday September 11 (updated data will be released later on Monday). But, while making it difficult to take too much notice of harvest reports so far, the early stage of the harvest is precisely the reason that the wet US weather is being watched so closely, in that little crop is safely in the barn so far. And further wet weather is on its way. According to Commodity Weather Group, the Midwest, having seen 4 inches of rain in some places in the early weekend (largely around south Missouri/ north Arkansas, Illinois and Indiana) will see "rains return" in north west areas on Wednesday and Friday "keeping disease risks elevated". This week overall, 0.5-2.0 inches of rain are forecast, with 40% coverage, while some areas will see 5 inches. And heading into the weekend and next week, the forecast is that "tropical moisture enhances rain across the Midwest… keeping early harvest progress slow". 'Injection of some risk premium' And this when hedge funds have built up a large net short position in US-traded grains, ie have been betting on lower prices, and are liable to close the holdings – putting yet more upward pressure on prices – if harvest conditions remain tricky. Water Street Solutions said: "The large net short fund position, coupled with end-user demand and reluctant farmer selling,  puts the market into a position that any disappointment relative to the huge crop expectations could set the market for a short-covering rally well before the typical '30-50% harvest progress mark'." (Typically, harvest brings a seasonal price low, thanks the ramp up in supplies it brings, and the ability to remove the last vestiges of risk premium from prices. In fact, CHS Hedging's Joe Lardy noted "an injection of some risk premium due to wet forecasts".) Prices rise Chicago corn futures for December rose 0.7% to $3.39 Ѕ a bushel as of 09:40 UK time (03:40 Chicago time), rising back above their 50-day moving average, which they have not closed above in three months. Soybean futures for November, boosted by ideas of decent demand too, fared even better, gaining 1.3% to $9.78 ј a bushel, trading back above its 40-day moving average, which it has not closed above in two months. The gains fed through into wheat too, prices of which have been depressed by ideas of ample world supplies - of feed quality wheat, anyway – leaving the market vulnerable to movements in the value of corn, of which feed is the major use. Chicago soft red winter wheat for December gained 1.1% to $4.07 ѕ a bushel. In what may be a sign of hedge funds reversing some of their near-record net short position in Chicago, the contract outperformed Kansas City hard red winter wheat, which for December added 0.7% to $4.20 ј a bushel, and in which managed money has a more modest net short to cover. Cotton soars In New York, cotton fared even better, gaining 2.3% to 68.84 cents a pound for December delivery, bouncing back over its 10-day and 20-day moving averages. It was a big help that January futures soared 3.0% to 14,540 yuan a tonne overnight on the Zhengzhou exchange in China, a country which is a huge player in the world cotton market. Furthermore, the US wetness is an issue for the country's cotton crops, which are heading into harvest in modest condition anyway, unlike corn and soybeans. "Rain and showers are throughout weekly forecasts for much of the [Cotton] Belt again this week," said Louis Rose at the Rose Report earlier on Monday. "At the time of this writing, showers are moving across the northern Mississippi River Delta," at a time when there was already talk of crop damage from wetness. Source - http://www.agrimoney.com/

23.09.2016

China - Hail in Shandong province hits over 6,500 hectares of pears

On September 11th, 2016, a severe hailstorm hit Yangxin county, located in Binzhou, Shandong province. This hailstorm lasted around 30 minutes, and the pellets were as big as a one Yuan coin and four or five centimetres in thickness. As a consequence, over 6,500 hectares of pear plantation orchards from Jinyang office in Yangxin county were severely impacted. Over 90% of pears were damaged in various degrees, as it occurred during the harvest season for pears. Source - http://www.freshplaza.com

23.09.2016

USA - Sept. 30 Crop Insurance Deadline for Oat and Wheat Growers

Sept. 30 is the deadline for Arkansas growers of winter wheat and oats to purchase crop insurance for the 2017 crop year. “With severe storms becoming more common, growers should seriously consider using crop insurance to help offset crop losses from natural disasters,” said Dr. Henry English, director, Small Farm Program at the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff. Sept. 30 is also the deadline for current policy holders and uninsured growers purchasing a policy for 2017 to make decisions on crop insurance coverage such as adjusting their coverage or to cancel their insurance. Dr. English reminds growers who do nothing that they will have the same level of coverage they had in 2016. All cancellations must be done in writing. The federal crop insurance program helps farmers recover some portion of expected income in case of crop loss or failure due to natural disasters which include drought, tornadoes, high water, high water, fires, floods or explosions. Producers should check with their crop insurance agent for specific details for the 2017 crop year. A list of crop insurance agents is available at all U.S. Department of Agriculture Service Centers and online at the RMA Agent Locator. The Arkansas Cooperative Extension Program offers its programs to all eligible persons regardless of race, color, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, age, disability, marital or veteran status, genetic information, or any other legally protected status, and is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer. Source - https://uapbnews.wordpress.com

23.09.2016

Italy - Apulian table grape victim of bad weather: damage cannot be estimated

In Apulia, table grape cultivation has always been well-protected against bad weather. Plastic films are used to cover vineyards in order to protect as far as possible the sensitive grape bunches. However, human knowledge cannot cope with crazy weather. An operator from the area reports to FreshPlaza:"If they had been just summer storms, there would not have been anything strange. But, we had a year's worth of rain pour down in just five days. No plastic film can cope with that. The plants were kept in "Bain Marie" for days... suffering all the predictable consequences". The areas most affected were Rutigliano, Conversano, Turi, Casamassima, Noicattaro, where the produce, tarpaulin covers and plastic films were severely damaged. There were heavy rainfalls from 6th to 11th September 2016. It seems that 60% of the product has been lost, but actually it is not possible to carry out an evaluation. "Firstly, we need to understand how the percentage is calculated, a trader explained. Otherwise we cannot make a calculation. Grapes do not deteriorate from one day to another, for this reason bunches that seem suitable for harvest today may present broken or rotten parts in a few days". The only thing we can sadly calculate at the moment is the number of vineyards damaged due to bad weather. Overall data can be estimated in 4-5 weeks. "We will certainly finish the harvest earlier", an operator concludes.  Meanwhile, sectorial organisations, such as Coldiretti Bari, report that prices are increasing (up more than 40%) and producers are bearing the costs in order to save what they can.  However, good-quality grapes have not benefited from the smaller amounts on the market yet. The regional Civil Protection issued a notice for bad weather conditions on Tuesday 20th September, ordinary alert (yellow) in most areas of Apulia and moderate alert (orange) in Gargano area.  Apulia is the top producer of table grapes in Italy, accounting for 74% of national production, and thanks to its huge contribution, Italy is the largest producer of table grapes in the world with 16% of world production.  In Italy 25,000 tons of table grapes (about 3.2% of domestic supply) are imported mainly from Europe (49%) and South and Central American countries (about 25%), especially Chile and Peru. The remaining part comes from Africa (13.5%) and Asia (4.6%). Source - http://www.freshplaza.com

23.09.2016

India - The Centre's Crop Insurance Scheme is proving to be a flop. Here's why

The Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) was launched with much ado in the beginning of this year. However, it seems the initiative is turning out to be quite the non-starter. According to the data accessed exclusively from the Union Agriculture Ministry, only 2.53 crore farmers have insured their crops under the scheme this year. A large number of these farmers are those who have taken loans. It is necessary for farmers to insure crops at the time of borrowing crop loans. In contrast, around 3.69 crore farmers had availed crop insurance last year under the National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS), a scheme that preceded the PMFBY. Prime Minister Modi had decided to replace NAIS and Modified NAIS (MNAIS) on 13 January 2016. The aim was to provide a more efficient insurance support to the farmers and protect them from crop damages. According to sources, the government had hoped to widen the net of crop insurance to 50% from existing 26% in the next three years. But, the results from the first crop season have been far from encouraging. The data available until 8 September reveals that only 2.53 crore farmers have insured their crops. This also includes farmers who have done so under the weather-based crop insurance scheme. Although, the figures are expected to improve a bit till the end of 2016. However, experts agree that it would be nowhere around the figure of 3.69 crores registered under NAIS and MNAIS in 2014-15. "No farmer avails crop insurance out of his will. The farmers know there is no guarantee of compensation within a stipulated time while they would lose the premium money. The payment is solely dependent on the discretion of insurance companies," says agriculture expert Devendra Sharma. Source - http://www.catchnews.com

22.09.2016

USA - Skies full of drones bring many new risks, Allianz warns

Insurance and financial services giant Allianz is warning that exponential growth in the number of drones in the sky carries a wide range of risks  Whether used commercially for industrial inspections, aerial photography, border patrol, emergency deliveries and crop surveys or recreationally by millions, drones or unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have the potential to become a multi-billion dollar business and deliver problem-solving technologies across numerous industries.  However, more drones in the skies also raise a number of new safety concerns, ranging from collisions and crashes to cyber-attacks and terrorism. To ensure safe UAS operations, systematic registration of unmanned aircraft and robust education and training of operators is necessary, according to a new report from aviation insurer Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (AGCS): Rise of the Drones: Managing the Unique Risks Associated with Unmanned Aircraft Systems.  “There have already been enough incidents and near-misses to date involving UAS to generate concern that the likelihood of collisions and other loss events will grow as numbers multiply,” says James Van Meter, an Aviation Practice Leader at AGCS. As drones are becoming smaller, cheaper and easier to use – and regulatory change, particularly in the US, lowers barriers to entry – growth prospects are surging. The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) forecasts that by the end of 2016 in the US over 600,000 UAS will be deployed for commercial use alone – three times the number of registered manned aircraft. In addition, 1.9 million UAS are expected to be in recreational use. Globally, the UAS market is forecast to reach 4.7 million units, or higher, by 2020 with the market for commercial application of UAS technology estimated to soar from $2bn to $127 billion. Made for menial or dangerous tasks “UAS in commercial use will increase greatly in the next decade because they are effective at carrying out menial or dangerous tasks,” says Thomas Kriesmann, Senior Underwriter General Aviation, AGCS. Work accidents such as employees falling off the roof on building inspections and workers compensation losses are expected to decrease as a result. UAS also have the potential to both solve problems and save costs in future across a number of other industries, throughout the developing world and in disaster relief situations. Emerging uses include delivering blood and vaccines to remote locations in Africa, fighting grass fires, pest control and even delivering pizza and coffee. Insurers are also increasingly utilizing UAS to make risk assessment of construction or infrastructure projects easier and safer. Claims handling can also be made quicker and more effective by using drones to survey loss damage after major catastrophes. For example, when parts of Tianjin, China, were rendered inaccessible after major explosions last year, high resolution images taken by UAS after the blasts where compared with previous photographs to determine how many vehicles had been destroyed. Allianz even supports a pilot-to-business marketplace, FairFleet, which links pilots with businesses in need of UAS, offering insurance coverage and claims settlement services. Mid-air collisions and loss of control core safety concerns However, new risks and the potential for misuse of UAS technology need to be considered, too. UAS raise two priority safety concerns: mid-air collisions and the loss of control. A mid-air collision could happen if the pilot cannot see and avoid manned aircraft in time, especially those that normally fly below 500 feet, such as helicopters, agricultural aircraft and aircraft landing or taking-off. Reports of UAS sightings from pilots, citizens and law enforcement have increased five-fold over the past year in the US; while there have been a number of near-miss incidents around the world including in China, Dubai, and the UK. Loss of control can result from a system failure or if the UAS flies beyond signal range. AGCS sees a major risk in loss of control from frequency interferences and other factors. A pilot losing control of a UAS during a building inspection could result in a total liability easily in excess of $5 million, if the UAS crashed into a truck or shop, for example. Even a small UAS could cause as much as $10 million in damage alone when hitting an engine of an airplane. An emerging peril is the potential terrorist threat from UAS targeting critical infrastructure such as (nuclear) power stations or live events. Other scenarios include hackers taking control during a flight, causing a crash, or hacking the radio signal and transmitting valuable recorded data from the aircraft from another control station (“spoofing”). There are also many public concerns over UAS around privacy issues. Improving UAS safety: need for training and registration A primary concern is the lack of consistent standards or regulations for the safe operation of UAS around the globe. “In many locations, there are few or no pilot training and maintenance standards,” says Van Meter. “In addition to regulation, education will continue to be key to ensuring safe UAS operations.” Training has a crucial role to play in reducing the risk of an incident occurring, with novice control a major cause of loss activity. Training should include meteorology, emergency instructions, air traffic law, including flight rules over buildings, system maintenance, flight time calculation and on-board camera image use. In many locations around the world no registration of UAS is mandatory, effectively affording the user anonymity in the event of a loss incident. “However, in future, identification of both UAS and operator will be essential to maintain proper liability in general,” says Kriesmann. “Introduction of car registration-style schemes will be needed sooner or later.” Drone insurance for multiple exposures Insurance can protect both operators and the public from risk of mid-air collision, as well as physical or property damage or injury to others. Manufacturers, owners and operators of UAS, as well as businesses that sell and service UAS, are exposed. So-called drone insurance is a fast-growing area of the insurance industry and different coverages are available, depending on the type of use. “Whether you run a coffee shop or a truck delivery business you need insurance to run your business. Drones are no different,” says Van Meter. “Commercial operators of UAS will require at least $1 million of insurance coverage to protect against risk exposures.” Assuming growth projections for the commercial industry materialize there is potential for the drone insurance market to be worth $500m+ by the end of 2020 in the US. Globally, its value could approach $1 billion.  Source - https://roboticsandautomationnews.com/

22.09.2016

Indonesia - C. Java farmers insure crops against losses during natural calamities

In their effort to prevent losses during unforeseen disasters, 88,492 paddy farmers in Central Java’s northern coastal areas have participated in an agriculture insurance program. With the insurance, paddy farmers who mostly have only less than 0.5 hectares of farming land can request for payments to cover financial losses suffered from harvest failures caused by natural disasters, plant pests and diseases. They can later use the payment to start working on their paddy fields again. Sumadi, the marketing manager of state-owned insurance firm PT Jasa Asuransi Indonesia (Jasindo) at the Semarang office, said the farmers had paddy fields amounting to 22,123.59 hectares of land. “One hectare of paddy field can be worked on by three or four farmers,” he said on Wednesday. Sumadi further explained that with a crop insurance program, farmers could be protected from losses during times of natural calamities. The government introduced the paddy farming insurance program in 2015, based on Law No.19/2013 on farmer protection and empowerment, Agriculture Minister Decree (Kepmen) No.40/2015 on paddy farming insurance premium guidelines and Kepmen No.2/2016 on paddy farming program management and implementation methods. Launched during a rainy season in October 2015, the program aims to cover one million hectares of paddy fields in 16 targeted provinces. The government has appointed Jasindo, which has five branches in Central Java, as the implementing entity of the program. Those offices are in Purwokerto, Semarang, Surakarta, Tegal and Yogyakarta. For Central Java, Sumadi said, Jasindo was targeting to cover 150,000 ha of fields. For northern coastal areas, which comprise five regencies, namely Kendal, Magelang, Semarang, Temanggung and Wonosobo, Jasindo targeted 24,000 ha, but only 13,356.64 ha had been realized. Jasindo also aimed to cover 38,500 ha of fields in seven other northern coastal areas, namely Blora, Demak, Grobogan, Jepara, Kudus, Pati and Rembang. Only 8,766.95 ha had been realized, however, said Sumadi. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="659"] Under threat – Dozens of estrildid finch eat paddy grains in a field belonging to a farmer in Central Java. Farmers in several areas across the province have participated in crop insurance programs to prevent losses during natural calamities. (JP/Suherdjoko)[/caption] Based on existing regulations, each farmer would pay an insurance premium of Rp 180,000 per ha of area. As the government subsidies 80 percent of the premium, farmers would pay only Rp 36,000 per ha per planting season. With the program, if 75 percent of their crops are damaged due to flooding, the dry season, pests or disease attacks, farmers can request Rp 6 million to cover losses in every hectare of their fields. “Farming group leaders play key roles to encourage their members to participate in the insurance program. Each member will have to a pay an insurance premium of around only Rp 9,000-Rp 12,000 because his or her land is less than 0.5 ha,” said Sumadi. He further said Jasindo had paid Rp 133 million to cover losses for Demak, Grobogan and Pati farmers, who suffered harvest failures caused by flooding at the beginning of 2016. To support the program, the Dutch government has provided software that can process satellite imagery that helps track the extent of damaged paddy fields through its Geodata for Upgrading Small Holders Farming System in Indonesia (G4INDO) project. “Our targeted group comprises 200,000 small farmers,” said G4INDO project head Aart Schrevel. The project has been piloted in three East Java regencies, namely Jombang, Kediri and Nganjuk, which is known as the national rice producer. Source - http://www.thejakartapost.com

22.09.2016

USA - Crop insurance is taxpayer-subsidized and now state tax-free, too

If you want something from the Missouri Legislature, it’s good to be a farmer. Last spring, after finishing work on the state’s $27.2 billion fiscal 2017 budget, lawmakers passed a few more tax breaks. The big one was $50 million in potential retroactive tax refunds for farmers who received federal disaster insurance for damage caused by the epic drought of 2012. People who sign up for exercise classes also will get a $5.7 million break on sales taxes. In June, Gov. Jay Nixon vetoed those tax breaks. On Sept. 14, the Legislature overrode his veto. The next day, Nixon put a hold on $57.2 million more from the budget passed in the spring. He’d already withheld $115 million in spending, saying the Legislature had overestimated the amount of money the state would take in. If the economy picks up dramatically, the money could still be spent. Because of all of this, farmers are going to get money that otherwise would have gone mostly to highways, school transportation and K-12 education, which absorbed the brunt of the budget hold-backs. It could be farmers’ tax refunds won’t amount to $50 million, but Nixon’s budget office estimates they will. This is what happens when you have a lot of needs and not enough money to meet them. Relative to their tax burden when the 1980 Hancock Amendment was passed to block the state budget from growing faster than the average family’s budget, Missourians are currently undertaxed by about $3.9 billion. But no one in Jefferson City wants to touch that one. The Missouri Farm Bureau is the state’s most powerful lobby. While it milks the image of the sturdy yeoman farmer, most of its business comes from brokering insurance, including federally subsidized crop insurance. When a farmer buys insurance on his crops, federal taxpayers pick up about 60 percent of the cost. When drought ravaged the Midwest in 2012, taxpayers covered most of the losses. In fact, a 2012 study by the University of Missouri Extension Service found that over the previous decade, Missouri farmers had received $1.80 in federal crop insurance indemnities for every dollar they paid in premiums. “Insured farmers had a pretty good year,” MU economist Raymond Massey said after the 2012 drought. Crop insurance payments were paid out in 2013 and thus were taxable in 2014. The Internal Revenue Service generally treats such payments as taxable income. So did Missouri and 39 other states that levy income taxes. But by passing Senate Bill 641, and then overriding Nixon’s veto, the Legislature decided that from now on, and retroactively to 2014, crop insurance payments no longer are subject to the state income tax. With enough tax-free, taxpayer-subsidized insurance, some farmers could be praying for drought. It’s good to be a farmer. Source - http://www.stltoday.com

775
of 1159
istanbul escort şişli escort tbilisi escort şişli escort şişli escort maslak escort istanbul escort beşiktaş escort taksim escort izmir escort ümraniye escort mecidiyeköy escort şişli escort taksim escort ümraniye escort kartal escort şirinevler escort maltepe escort istanbul escort ümraniye escort kadıköy escort vip escort mersin escort istanbul escorts ataköy escort avcılar escort beylikdüzü escort okmeydanı escort şişli escort tuzla escort işitme cihazı sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop
istanbul escort