NEWS
of 1225
News
10.03.2014

India - Crop over 6.72 lakh ha damaged in Maharashtra

Unseasonal rain accompanied by hailstorm in central parts of Maharashtra has claimed four more lives in day and more than 50% crops on 6.72 lakh hectares of agricultural land across the state has been damaged.State agriculture commissioner Umakant Dangat said that over 6.72 lakh hectares of agricultural land across 28 districts in the state has been affected due to unseasonal rainfall and hailstorms. "Over 50, 000 hectares of fruit crops and food crops on 6.20 lakh hectares has been destroyed," he said.Beed district seems to be worst affected in the region and losses have been reported from the entire Marathwada region. Buldhana district is the worst affected in Vidarbha as many parts of the state have come seen rainfall. Parts of Jalgaon, Dhule, Solapur, Satara, Sangli and Ahmednagar districts have also suffered agricultural losses.The process of conducting panchnama to assess the exact damage is still underway and the agriculture loss could go up. "A team from the Centre is likely to visit the affected regions this week. We will receive the detailed programmed on March 10," Dangat said.In Aurangabad district, Sillod taluka seems to be the worst affected due to heavy hailstorm and rain in Ambejogai and Ajanta belt for an hour on Saturday afternoon. The primary information indicates that around 27 villages in the taluka have suffered losses. Agriculture land of over 2, 000 hectares has been damaged more than 50%, while the damage in 1, 000 hectares is less than 50%.Agriculture department official said that Rabi sowing was done on more than 1.64 hectares (Ha) of land in Hingoli district. Preliminary estimate by the revenue department recorded till March 3 indicates loss of crops over 6,731 hectares of land. Parts of the district witnessed repeated unseasonal rainfall and winds from February 23 to March 9 and experienced hailstorms for five times during this period.Farmers have expressed their resentment over the agriculture department survey, which shows that crops on over 3,338 hectares of land has been damaged more than 50%."Hingoli district is known for cultivation of wheat and gram crop in abundance. Since it is a rain-fed area, the atmosphere is conducive for these crops. I was expecting around 20 quintals of gram but the unseasonal rainfall has damaged more than 50% of the crop," said farmer Santosh Nagulkar.Another farmer Suresh Bedse Patil said that the orchard owners too feel the assessment is very short of actual losses. "Only 207 hectares of land has been considered in survey reports, whereas actual horticulture crop losses account far more," another farmer Suresh Bedse Patil."Rivers and nullahs are overflowing at many places in Hingoli, including KendraBudruk, Risod, Sauna and Manaspimpri. The MSEB too incurred loss to the tune of Rs 20 lakh, in which 423 poles were uprooted and six transformers were burnt," said sub-divisional officer, agriculture department, B S Kachuve.Source - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/

10.03.2014

Australia - No set federal funds for drought-hit WA

Federal and State agricultural ministers are yet to flesh out the details surrounding the Federal Government's latest $320 million drought assistance package.But Federal Agricultural Minister Barnaby Joyce said at the Northern Beef Industry Forum last week there will be no set allocation of funding for WA."We will deal with the issues pertinent to drought, not with lines on maps," Mr Joyce said."We know around Southern Cross farmers are experiencing drought, so they are just as entitled to access the money as someone in Queensland, New South Wales or the Northern Territory."That is a negotiated process we will be looking through, we set criteria but within that criteria the state will sort it out."I am not a member of the WA parliament and don't have the right to determine how they wish to administer this, we put down guiding principles and people can work it out from there."In his first trip to WA since his appointment to the ministry, Mr Joyce said he was working with State ministers in a negotiated way to establish how to assist people to get through the issues pertinent to drought.WA Agriculture Minister Ken Baston welcomed the package, and noted the extreme nature of drought in NSW and Queensland."We have a strip of drought in the eastern Wheatbelt although we have had record harvests in WA last year, some 16 million tonnes," Mr Baston said."We still have a pocket that has suffered and had no crop at all."There is also a strip in the rangelands in the West Gascoyne which has been extremely dry."The rest of the State has had some fantastic rain so we don't have the same pressures as Queensland and NSW, but we certainly do have pressures on anyone who hasn't had an income."The assistance package announced last week will allow farmers to apply for loans of up to $1m, or up to 50 per cent of eligible debt.The loans will be made available at a variable interest rate, starting at 4pc for a term of up to five years.Source - http://www.farmweekly.com.au/

07.03.2014

Predicting the future: Farmers rolling dice with crop insurance

COLUMBUS — Most farmers say they would farm without crop insurance, but it makes their lives a little easier. Without the backup of crop insurance, they say, their business and livelihood might not survive.“It’s been tremendous protection,” said Fred Pond, an Ohio farmer in Van Wert and Paulding counties. ”It’s as important as a tractor and a combine. I wouldn’t farm without it.”Big moneyThe federal crop insurance program is a taxpayer-subsidized program that helps protect farmers against loss in income from poor crop prices or poor yields. Farmers pay about 40 percent of the premiums to insure their crops, according to the USDA Risk Management Agency.Farmers have spent $38 billion out of their own pockets to purchase crop insurance since 2000, according to the Risk Management Agency. In 2013 alone, farmers spent nearly $4.5 billion to purchase more than 1.2 million crop insurance policies, protecting 128 different crops.Program expansionIn Ohio, the percent of eligible acres insured went from 15 percent in 1994 to 68 percent in 2012. Numbers from other prime farm states are similar.In 2012, a severe drought crippled much of the crops in the Midwest and drove crop insurance costs to a record $17 billion — prompting national discussion on ways to cut costs to the program as Congress began to consider a new farm bill.Instead — after two years of debate — the new farm bill expands crop insurance by nearly $6 billion.Under the new farm bill, the crop insurance program will cost nearly $90 billion over 10 years.Risk managementPond, a soybean, corn and wheat producer farming over 1,100 acres in Van Wert and Paulding counties, said his farming operation wouldn’t be what it is today — and might not have survived — without the cushion crop insurance provides.Pond says the weather in his part of northwestern Ohio is more like what Indiana endures than most of Ohio and when the weather woes combine with clay soil, problems erupt.He said crop insurance is the only way to steady revenue for a farming operation.Collecting on lossesPond said he has collected four of the last five years due to some weather effect on the crops. He said one year it was late planting, then dry weather, and another year it was too wet.In 2012, he had 102-bushel per acre corn yields. In 2013, the yields were above the 200 mark and was the first year the farm did not collect.Not every acre coveredOne lifelong farming couple said cost is a consideration in their farming operation and that means not every acre is covered by crop insurance.Marsha and Wendell Waters, corn and soybean farmers in Coshocton and Madison counties, said they carry the insurance only on their Madison County farmland. The couple said the cost, which is calculated on the base of the countywide yields, stops them from getting coverage in Coshocton County.Marsha Waters said they have collected only once and that was in 2012 during the drought that plagued western Ohio. “We are very fortunate. We have had consistent yields,” she said.In addition, their farming operation in Coshocton County does something that many Ohio farms don’t: irrigate. “That’s our insurance,” said Wendell Waters.Young farmerIn eastern Ohio, one young farmer considers crop insurance a risk management tool and nothing else.Andy Wentling, a 1,200-acre corn and soybean farmer in Stark County, said he would still farm without crop insurance, he just wouldn’t be as comfortable doing so. “It makes you sleep better at night knowing it’s there,” said Wentling. “2012 was a very good example of why you have to have it.”He said his crops that year yielded 50 percent of normal yields. “Without crop insurance, it would have been a bad year,” said Wentling.As his family’s farming operation grows, Wentling said, crop insurance will become even more important.Farm bill tradeoffU.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said crop insurance is necessary to make up for the loss of direct payments.But the senator, who sits on the Senate ag committee, said there needs to be an end for subsidies for crop insurance.“Taxpayers spend too much on crop insurance,” said Brown.Brown said changes in the system mean it is a time for a change in farm operations, and the new farm bill eliminates direct payments to farmers in exchange for expanding crop insurance.Revenue protectionPond insures his crops for revenue protection. He said that way he knows the bottom line in February and develops his marketing plan around it. He said the goal is not to collect on his crop insurance, but it is necessary to maintain farm operations. “I don’t buy house insurance to collect on it and neither do I purchase crop insurance to collect on it,” said Pond. He said it is an important part of the puzzle that makes a complete farm operation.It is difficult for farmers to plan and make decisions when they don’t know what the end salary will look like, Pond added. Having crop insurance lets farmers operate a business knowing what the bottom line will be.“We are trying to feed the country and need to know what we are going to make,” said Pond.Crop insurance ratesOhio Farm Bureau Federation officials say that Ohio crop insurance rates are better than some states with higher loss histories, which tends to increase the amounts of coverage.While not Ohio-specific, the biggest impact is the program’s capacity to spread risk, which Joe Cornely, senior director, OFBF corporate communications, thinks might enable some farmers to be more aggressive in building their businesses.Crop insurance also makes it easier to borrow money — bankers are more willing lenders when there’s less risk.Ohio economyCornely also pointed out another impact on the Ohio economy: Because agriculture is the state’s largest economic sector, the insurance that protects farmers against income volatility is providing the same protection to local jobs/economies, and food prices.Pond added there are not a lot of industries where you go to work one day and be wiped out. It can happen in farming due to the weather and tragedies such as tornadoes.“Farmers take quite a risk,” said Pond. “It’s not wise not to have it. Farmers need the protection in order to survive.”Farming has changedThe crops grown in Ohio have also changed since crop insurance became the norm. Cornely said large-scale commercial crops are now much more stress tolerant.“They still yield in the face of drought, flood, late planting, etc. This is a testament to agricultural research,” said Cornely. And Cornely said more vigorous crops mean fewer payouts.A second change is that the Ohio crop base is now more diverse — including more direct-to-consumer crops, driven by the growth in small farms.The changes mean farmers have to adapt their operations — and crop insurance providers need to build products that meet the needs of these types of farms.Source - http://www.farmanddairy.com/

07.03.2014

Australia - Rain still playing havoc with fruit crops

Rain that fell earlier in this month is still causing problems for some dried fruit growers in north-west Victoria.Falls of up to 70 millimetres were reported in some areas, which left many growers hoping for cooler conditions to dry things out.Stephen Bennett, a dried fruit grower at Merbein, near Mildura says the rain has caused a slight fungal infection in his grapes."About a week after that rain we found it creeping in," he says."I had an agronomist out...I think in the future we'll have to be quite vigilant with some springtime preventative sprays."Despite the damage, Stephen estimates only about one to two per cent of the crop will be lost."Overall the vast majority of the berries haven't been affected and if we don't get any more adverse weather they'll dry a good light colour and that'll be quite good fruit, overall."Source - http://www.abc.net.au/

07.03.2014

USA - Cold and snow could affect farmers this spring

It is what everyone wants to know: How much longer will the cold and snow last? While it isn't unusual for this type of weather to hang on into March, some are predicting it could stick around longer than normal. That means, farmers could be starting their spring planting late. And that is making for some nervous corn and bean farmers in our area. Chad Zahner's St. Bernard, Gerty, is supposed to like the cold weather, but this year even she hasn't wanted to go outside. Its been a rough winter and the Wakarusa Farmer is worried it could mean a rough spring as well."We just keep sitting here going, are we even going to get in the fields by April," says Zahner.While it is still too early to know, according to Purdue, the Indiana State Climate Office says winter could stick around longer than normal. And that could mean a later planting season."I honestly, don't think we will be rolling until May," says Zahner.It is not unusual for cold and snow to hang around into March. But some are predicting it could go until early April. And most farmers, Zahner included, like to get their seed in the ground by April 15th. That won't happen if the ground is too cold. Experts say the ground should be at least 50 degrees for optimal planting conditions."The biggest thing this year is you are going to be so far behind, you are not going to have that prep time. You are just going to have to go. You are going to have to put seed in the ground," says Zahner, "Because if you don't get it in in a timely manner, it turns into a late fall. And then you could be dealing with this snow late fall."The past few years have been a roller coaster for farmers. In 2012, our area experienced an early spring. It was 85 degrees in March. Many farmers planted early, then drought decimated their crops later on. 2013 was more normal. Farmers were planting mid April and yields were fairly good. But Zahner says even if they end up planting late this spring there are plenty of other factors -- good and bad -- that could influence their crop in the coming months."That is farming, if it was easy, everyone would do it," says Zahner.So what does this mean for you, the consumer? If farmers do end up planting later it could impact yields, meaning less product at harvest time. And that could mean higher prices at the grocery store. Source - http://www.wsbt.com/

07.03.2014

USA - Crop insurance linked to conservation

The 2014 farm bill, passed just a few weeks ago, makes several changes to conservation programs. Most notably, a number of programs were merged, and conservation compliance was connected to crop insurance.The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) says the bill contains plenty of good and bad news for conservation advocates. On the plus side, NSAC officials say the top thing is connecting compliance to crop insurance.That move was opposed by many ag groups because there was concern loss of federally subsidized crop insurance would mean no crop insurance for those who might get caught in a problem beyond their control.But, officials at the American Farm Bureau Federation say some of those concerns have been reduced because the language says the farmer would lose the federal crop insurance subsidy instead of all chance of obtaining insurance.“From our perspective, the biggest policy change in the new farm bill is to reconnect crop insurance subsidies to conservation compliance requirements that protect soil and water resources,” says Susan Heathcote, water program director for the Iowa Environmental Council.Meanwhile, the new farm bill consolidates 23 conservation programs into 13. Advocates say the idea is to simplify conservation at the federal government level and reduce administrative overhead.“Anytime you can make the government more efficient that is good,” says Ben Gleason, sustainable program manager for the Iowa Corn Growers Association.Environmental groups say they are hopeful the changes will make existing programs more flexible and useful to more farmers. But, some organizations are concerned the efficiencies also may mean less money for conservation. Several programs are looking at program cuts. For example, the CRP cap would drop to 24 million acres by 2017. Current CRP enrollment is about 25.6 million acres.On the plus side, environmental groups say the new farm bill makes wetland and grassland easement funding permanent, meaning there will not be a need to try to find new funding in the next farm bill debate.One example of the merger of conservation programs is the new Agricultural Conservation Easement Program. It is the result of the merger of the Wetlands Reserve Program, the Grassland Reserve Program and the Farm and Ranchland Protection Program.Source - http://www.iowafarmertoday.com/

07.03.2014

USA - Recent California Rain and Snow Too Little, Too Late

Following one of the driest years on record for the Golden State, recent rain and snow were welcomed with open arms. However, despite improving conditions, 2014 is not off to a better start, as nearly 91 percent of the state still remains in a severe drought as of Tuesday, March 4, 2014, according to the United States Drought Monitor."The storm has had an impact and the numbers are better then they were before; however, when you take the whole picture into view, it hasn't really helped a great deal," AccuWeather U.S. Western Weather Expert Ken Clark said.Thanks to the most recent rounds of rain and snow throughout California, Los Angeles and San Francisco both received at least 86 percent of their normal rainfall for the month of February. However, farther south, San Diego only received 44 percent of the city's normal precipitation for February."This was a decent storm but it was a fairly typical winter storm. It's not unusual but it's been the only we've had this year," Clark said.As the storm that spanned from the end of February to the beginning of March was the only significant storm that the state received so far in 2014, the overall impact on the drought proved to be minimal."The Sierra snowpack is still only about one-third of normal," Clark said. "If you look at the amount of snow cover there is and then look at the reservoir sites, most of them are at below or near all-time record low levels."Perhaps one of the most alarming actualities are the comparisons between 2013 and 2014, farther showing the severity of the drought in California.This image was acquired Jan. 18, 2013, by a NASA satellite. (Photo/NASA Earth Observatory)A NASA satellite obtained this image on Jan. 18, 2014. (Photo/NASA Earth Observatory)There is a vast difference between the images taken exactly one year apart in the state's mountain ranges. In the second photo, taken this January, only the peaks of the Sierra Nevada bear snow compared to the sufficient snow on the mountains in 2013.Even farther north, snow is barely visible in the most recent photo in both the Cascade Mountains and the Coastal Range.As of March 6, 2014, for the entire state only 33 percent of the normal snow water equivalent has been met, according to the California Data Exchange Center. As the snowpack is essential for filling the reservoirs across the state and providing a third of California's water supply according to NASA, concerns are mounting as the region's rainy season is winding down."The biggest concerns continue to be how much water is going to be allowed for farming in the Central Valley," Clark said.With April approaching quickly, many grape growers and farmers alike may find themselves in a tough situation as an ample water supply is vital to yielding an adequate crop.With almost half of the fruits and nuts grown in the U.S. coming from California, as well as some of the nation's finest wines, higher prices for produce and other commodities are possible across the nation are possible as the drought persists.As worries escalate, a prolonged dry pattern is in store for much of California, allowing the state no more relief in the near future, thus pushing California even deeper into the drought. With severe drought conditions continuing, the state will be at higher risk for economic loss, reduced crops, water shortages and restrictions and wildfires.Source - http://www.accuweather.com/

07.03.2014

USA - Drought brings different winter task for Sacramento Valley crops

By now, many of us have noticed impacts of the drought — a dry countryside, fewer grazing cows and water only upon request at restaurants.Farmers, however, have been waiting, and in many cases worrying through the winter.Northern California crops are dominated by orchards and rice, which make up the bulk of farm income. If anyone can be lucky during a drought, Butte County nut farmers are more fortunate than other parts of the state because most orchards use groundwater, said Joe Connell, University of California farm adviser.If groundwater levels drop, growers will be pumping from farther down. However, the groundwater in the Sacramento Valley is in comparatively good shape. Connell said the recent rain has helped. Before the storms arrived, farmers were watering to ensure the soil profile wasn't completely dry. Watering in winter is a very rare occurrence.So far, things look like they will be OK for orchard crops, Connell said. The supply of bees was adequate and before the rains, there was time for bees to pollinate. Problems could occur for people who don't have access to wells, or are located over aquifers more susceptible to decline. At this point, it will be difficult for farmers to have new wells drilled before the growing season, Connell said. Many companies are already booked for months into the future.Rice in dry timesThe story is different for rice, as farmers primarily use surface water delivered through canals. "The buzz is that everyone is waiting on what the allotment will be," said UC Cooperative Extension farm adviser Cass Mutters. "No one will know until April 1." The recent rains have helped, but those storms were just a dribble compared to the amount of rain that would have normally arrived by this time of year. Both the Department of Water Resources and the Bureau of Reclamation have said water deliveries will be very low or nonexistent for growers. Some districts with senior water rights have been told water delivery will be 40 percent. Landowners with less secure water rights may very well receive zero.Until those numbers are finalized, its tough to decide exactly how much land to plant, Mutters explained.He has heard that up to 100,000 acres in the Sacramento Valley may be left unplanted.The price of rice is holding steady, he said, so farmers who have access to water will want to grow a crop.Those who have access to groundwater will calculate the costs, as pumping adds a utility bill to the bottom line. If a grower has tree crops in addition to rice land, the water will be shifted to trees, if possible, because trees are a large multi-year investment.Mutters said the deadline for taking out crop insurance was in February, and most folks are signed up.IN THE LONG-TERMThe immediate concern is the 2014 crop. Yet, over the long-term drought can impact markets established by growers and rice handlers.When buyers can't rely on established business relationships, they look elsewhere. "To regain the market share you (sometimes) have to sell at bargain prices to entice customers back," Mutters said.Australia, for example, suffered through nine years of drought which ended in 2009, and helped the rice industry in the United States. An Australian company ended up buying a mill in Woodland to protect its market share, Mutters explained.Source - http://www.chicoer.com/

07.03.2014

Philippines - Farmers receive indemnity thru DAR-PCIC agri insurance program

The Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) in Ilocos Norte recently compensated some 386 agrarian reform beneficiaries (ARBs) who were victims of the devastation last year caused by typhoons Odette and Vinta.Provincial Agrarian Reform Program Officer Felicidad Dumaguing led the awarding of indemnity checks totalling to P1.5 million to farmers of Ilocos Norte.“The typhoons which occurred last year destroyed most of the farmers’ crops due to strong winds while those who have managed to harvest their rice and crops also suffered because of floods. Farmers weren’t able to get their produce to the market centers and it rotted,” said Dumaguing.Early last year the DAR partnered with the Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation (PCIC) to provide crop insurance protection for the ARBs of Ilocos Norte. The protection plan is contained in the joint program called the “Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries-Agricultural Insurance Program (ARB-AIP).Under the ARB-AIP, farmers are protected against losses due to pest and disease infestations, natural calamities and extreme weather conditions brought about by climate change.The ARB-AIP is a P17.1 billion crop insurance coverage plan between the DAR and PCIC, an attached agency of the Department of Agriculture (DA), wherein the DAR provides a premium subsidy worth P1 billion.The P 1.5 million indemnity payments were made for ARBs in 23 municipalities of Ilocos Norte where some 900 hectares of palay were destroyed by the typhoons.The insurance program benefits agrarian reform beneficiaries who are members of agrarian reform beneficiary organizations (ARBOs) in Ilocos Norte.Source - http://news.pia.gov.ph/

06.03.2014

India - Hailstorm causes havoc in Hyderabad

HYDERABAD: Unseasonal hail and thunder showers brought normal life to a halt across Hyderabad as climate change expert said the 'unusual weather' this time of the year is likely to prevail for the next three days. Trees got uprooted causing widespread traffic jams in many parts of the city, while power and telephone lines snapped in several places as blinding rain accompanied by strong winds forced people to scurry indoors. The heavily overcast sky opened up in the afternoon and sudden showers lashed Banjara Hills, Begumpet, HiTec City, Malkajgiri, Ameerpet and Nampally, among other areas of the city. "It is unusual weather. During the last few years, we never had a storm with hail in the first week of March," said R V Subba Rao, a climate change expert. Some thunderstorm activity was however recorded in the past in the second and third week of the month, experts said. Officials from the Met department attributed the sudden weather change to moisture incursion from Arabian Sea and instability in the atmosphere, resulting in clouding and thunderstorm activity. "Generally, we experience this kind of weather in the second half of March. However, for the last four days, entire Telangana is experiencing thunderstorms. The effect is more in Telangana, particularly north Telangana, compared to coastal AP and Rayalaseema," said M Narasimha Rao, assistant meteorologist, Met department. Experts are hoping for a normal summer, or else they feel the annual monsoon, which is the lifeline for lakhs of farmers, could get adversely affected. "Summer should be normal, then only we can expect good monsoon," added Rao. Met office at Begumpet recorded a 35 mm rainfall as the maximum temperature nosedived to 26.3 degree Celsius, 8 degrees below normal. Officials said Kapra recorded 39.0 mm rainfall, the highest in the city.Two big trees got uprooted near Bible House and Rajendranagar, causing massive traffic jams and GHMC said its helpline was flooded with complaints of severe water logging in several areas. Trees got uprooted, causing traffic snarls in five other places, including Kundanbagh. "I got stuck for more than 45 minutes near VIP colony, wondering what had gone wrong. I later realized that a large tree got uprooted there," said Avinash Kumar, a techie, who was returning home from work. Municipal authorities said water logging was reported at more than 70 places in the city, including Masab Tank, Abids, CM camp office, near Raj Bhavan, Amberpet and Nims hospital among others. The only good news came as the electricity demand came down to 253 million units a day from 300 million units, due to rains and subsequent temperature drop. Power consumption also saw a slump in Adilabad, Nizamabad and Warangal districts. On Tuesday, the maximum power demand touched 261 million units. With heavy rains even in Krishna basin, inflows into reservoirs also improved leading to increased hydro power generation. As a result, the hydro power generation also stepped up from 750 MW to 960 MW. Heavy gale and hailstorm across Telangana caused snapping of power lines and led to interruption in power supply in several districts. Dr Thilotham R Kolanu, former professor of environment management at Administrative Staff College of India said they have received reports of crop damage due to the rains during the last four days. "While mango crop was damaged to a small extent, tomato that is selling at cheapest rates till other day might see a substantial rise in prices because of the damage," said Kolanu, chief executive of renewable energy consulting firm Greenstratos Consulting. The heavy rains accompanied by hail and strong winds caused severe damage to standing crops in many places in Warangal and Khammam districts. Sheds and thatched houses collapsed in several villages in Warangal. Madduru in Warangal received 370 mm of rainfall, the highest ever rainfall recorded during the month of March in the district. TRS president K Chandrasekhar Rao told media that the extent of damage to crops is yet to be ascertained. "The damage is heavy. We will submit a memorandum to the governor seeking early enumeration and payment of compensation to the affected farmers," he said. Maize and chilli fields were submerged in Panthani, Station Ghanpur and Chagallu mandals of Warangal.Source - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/

06.03.2014

Cuba - Untimely Rains Hit Cuban Tobacco Harvest

Near the close of the harvest, local people in the Cuban municipality of San Juan y Martínez, which boasts the finest tobacco plantations in the world, are seeing their hopes of a plentiful season dashed by unexpected winter rains.“It’s been a bad year, a rebellious one as we call it. There was a lot of rain, which rots the plants. Tobacco needs sun during the day and cold at night,” 67-year-old Dámaso Rodríguez, a worker on the Valle plantation in this municipality, 180 kilometres west of Havana, in the province of Pinar del Río, told IPS.“We are late with the farm chores,” said Yamilé Venero, a young tobacco worker on the same plantation. “It’s not worth planting again,” added María Teresa Ventos, a 54-year-old woman who comes every season to string the tobacco leaves onto long poles for drying in this agricultural industry which is a source of temporary jobs for women.Since November, when the season started, there has been too much rain in the province which was expected to supply 70 percent of the 26,400 tonnes of tobacco leaf forecast for the 2013-2014 harvest. San Juan y Martínez and the neighbouring municipality of San Luis were severely affected; between them they provide 86 percent of the tobacco for the prized and costly Havana cigars.Local sources reported the loss of 813 hectares in Pinar del Río and partial damage in a further 1,000 hectares, out of the provincial plan for 15,000 hectares. Many farms had to uproot their tobacco plants and replant three times over.Tobacco is Cuba’s third export, after nickel and medical products.In 2013, the country earned 447 million dollars from tobacco, eight percent more than in 2012 when the Anglo-Cuban corporation Habanos S.A. made 416 million dollars. It is the sole vendor of Cuban cigars worldwide, trading in 160 countries, with most of its business in Europe, although cigars are doing well in Asia and the Middle East.The storm clouds over Pinar del Río, in the west of the country, may hurt sales this year, along with other problems like tough anti-tobacco laws in Europe and the economic blockade imposed by the United States on Cuba because of the of conflict between Washington and Havana that has gone on for half a century.To weather the damage done by the downpours, plantations in Pinar extended their planting season, which usually ends in January, by 45 days, and delayed other major tasks of the current tobacco harvest. They have also resorted to harvesting “capadura” (lower quality) leaf and plant regrowth, in order to maximise production.On the Valle plantation, 12 skilled men continue to harvest tobacco leaves and take them to a high-roofed wooden barn at one side of the estate. Inside, 12 women string the leaves in bunches and arrange them on long poles which are then hung in tiers right up to the slanted roof for traditional curing (controlled drying) in air.“After all, the tobacco is good quality, but not as good as before,” Rodríguez said. This veteran tobacco grower, the son and grandson of peasant farmers, is concerned that the strange weather in his birthplace “is no longer the same” as it was three decades ago.The unique combination of temperature, soil and humidity in the Vuelta Abajo region, in the west of the province, is essential for the development of the best handmade premium cigars on the planet, a process that involves close to 190 different operations.Only here can all the types of leaf be grown that are used in making cigars, the successors to the rolled leaves smoked by native people on the island of Cuba when Spanish colonists arrived in 1492.Dayana Hernández and Aliet Achkienazi, researchers at the state Meteorology Institute, have forecast that this territory will become warmer every decade this century, unsettling the conditions that give Cuban cigars their exclusive taste, aroma and texture and have earned them their protected designation of origin (PDO).The PDO protects agricultural products that have a quality and characteristics fundamentally or exclusively due to geographical factors in their place of origin. In this case it is reserved for cigars of over three grams, made in Cuba according to traditional methods from varieties of Cuban black tobacco.The study “Impacto del cambio climático sobre el cultivo del tabaco en la zona de Pinar del Río, Cuba” (Impact of climate change on tobacco cultivation in the area of Pinar del Río, Cuba) analysed particularly productive districts in the province, including San Juan y Martínez and San Luis.On the basis of future climate scenarios, the authors forecast that rising temperatures will not cause great harm in the next few decades, but later on, as warming increases, crop yields will decline. However, in the north of the area they studied, the climate will be more stable and it is less likely that temperatures will exceed 25 degrees Celsius.The study found that “the impact of climate change can be mitigated in conditions compatible with the sustainable development” of the delicate tobacco leaf. It recommended “further research” into the effects of imbalances in the rainfall patterns on the plantations.The experienced eye of Francisco José Prieto, the manager of the Valle plantation, who owns 4.5 hectares that have belonged to his family since his grandfather’s days, led him to take steps ahead of the inclement weather.He planted early, and was already harvesting “when the rains intensified,” he told IPS. “I didn’t have to replant,” said this member and president of the Tomás Valdés Credit and Services Cooperative (CCS), which groups 50 farms in Vuelta Abajo.The CCSs were created in the 1960s as voluntary associations of small farmers who retain ownership of their land, and gain collective access to technologies, financing and sales facilities for their products.But in spite of his efforts, Prieto doubts whether this harvest will be as good as the last, when his farm produced 158 quintals (7,272 kilos), a record result.Prieto uses soil conservation techniques on his land. He sprays the tobacco only once, and after the harvest, he plants crop varieties that improve the soil, like maize and jack beans. “They provide shade, conserve nutrients that otherwise would be washed away by the rains, and they are dug in as a green manure,” he said.The 44,863 people living in San Juan y Martínez, on large estates dotted with simple houses with light roofs, depend on the success of each tobacco harvest. “We are paid fixed wages, with bonuses for productivity,” union leader Celeste Muñoz told IPS.Constantly working dry tobacco wrapper leaf from the last harvest on her roller, Muñoz, employed for the last 17 years in a centre for tobacco collection, selection and processing, said that her team of 50 women is trying to “recover as much dry leaf as possible.”She is not sure whether it is “because of the climate, the fertilisers or the variety planted,” but she claims that the yield “is less than before. We got as many as 1,000 quintals (46,039 kilos) of dry leaf in one season,” she said nostalgically.Source - http://www.ipsnews.net/

06.03.2014

USA - Tense wait for water allocations in California

The United States Agriculture Department's chief economist says it's still too early to know exactly how the drought in California will affect horticulture production.America's biggest agricultural state is in the grip of its worst drought in decades, and irrigators there should soon learn if they'll receive sufficient water allocations to salvage their season. USDA chief economist Joe Glauber says that some of an expected reduction in Californian rice production could be offset by increases elsewhere in the US, particularly in the Mississippi delta region. But the impact on American horticulture could be significant, unless irrigators get the water allocations they're looking for."California accounts for about a third of [US] vegetable production, and about two-thirds of fruit and tree nut production. In fact, if you were to go to tree nuts, it's probably 80 per cent," Dr Glauber said. "For producers who have a little bit of water, they're going to want to maintain it on trees and other things that are more perennial in nature. But the impact [on production] unfortunately, we just don't know yet, until we see what the allocations are."Decent allocations are by no means assured, however, with reservoir levels low. Dr Glauber says irrigators who do get an allocation will then face a choice that's all too familiar to Australian farmers: whether to grow a crop, or sell water for cash, which is allowed in some US jurisdictions.With Australia once again in the midst of its own debate about appropriate levels of government assistance for drought-affected farmers, the US crop insurance model has again be raised by those who'd like Australia to consider crop insurance as part of its national drought response.But the Californian experience also shows the limits of a crop insurance program. Dr Glauber says restrictions around crop insurance mean that many California irrigators won't receive relief through that program. "A lot of these insurance products were developed essentially for row crop, broadacre producers in the mid-west, less so for specialty crop producers in California," he said.If there's not enough water to plant, we don't allow them to insure for that. I think for a lot of these producers, they probably won't be covered."The insurance is predicated on available water supplies, so if there's not enough water to plant, we don't allow them to insure for that. It's only after the insurance period, when they can sign up for insurance, closes, if there's a decision at that point to cut off water, then they are eligible. "I think for a lot of these producers, the decision about water allocations will come before the insurance kicks in, so they probably won't be covered there."In terms of other drought assistance, like Australia at the end of the Millennium Drought, the US President Barack Obama has indicated a long-game approach. He has travelled to drought-affected regions, and talked about the importance of preparing to better manage drought in the face of climate change."We have programs to encourage water conservation and to encourage water management," Dr Glauber said. "Now of course that's not immediate relief, but hopefully it helps over the longer run."Despite a predicted increase in wheat exports for the current year, adverse weather elsewhere in America could see US wheat exports decline in the following year."We know that for our fall [autumn] planted wheat, the area's down from a year ago. There's some concerns about the US wheat crop - the winter wheat crop - because of the severe cold that we've experienced this year and because of some lingering dryness in the southern plains. "Quite apart form the California drought, this is our fourth year of dryness in Texas and Oklahoma and that area. "We'll know a little better about the size of that crop over the next couple of months as it emerges and we start getting more accurate crop condition reports."Grain markets have already seen greater volatility in futures trading since tensions have escalated in Ukraine.The Black Sea region was responsible for almost a quarter of global wheat exports last year, and interruptions to grain supply from that region has caused global price spikes in the past.There's been no evidence yet of Black Sea exporters defaulting on contracts, but Australian analysts have said that Australia's capacity to capitalise might be limited because of an export program that's already tightly locked in. Dr Glauber says the US will have a better sense of its supply capacity once those crop condition reports start to flow."But prior to that, our forecasts have certainly suggested that we'll export a little less [wheat] next year," he said.Source - http://www.abc.net.au/

06.03.2014

Ukraine - Farmers will have to reseed 6-10% of winter crop area in spring 2014

Ukrainian farmers will have to reseed 6-10% of winter crop plantings in spring 2014, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center Director Mykola Kulbida said on Monday. “This year we expect winter crops to be damaged on 6-10% of area, depending on the region. But this is less than occurs on average in Ukraine,” Kulbida said. According to him, winter crops are now in the worst condition in Luhansk region, where 15-20% of plantings are weak and sparse, and in Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk, Poltava, and Sumy regions (11-15%). The meteorologist says the best crop condition is observed in Western Ukraine, Zhytomyr region and Crimea, where the portion of damaged crops is at most 5%. Kulbida also pointed out that this condition of winter crops allows predicting their yield to rise by 10-20% from 2013. “This condition of winter crops suggests that their yields will be 10-20% higher than last year’s 26.5 MMT,” he said.Source - http://www.blackseagrain.net/

06.03.2014

Preventing grass tetany, ‘The Grass Staggers’

One of my favorite questions that I seem to get every year is, “I had a cow die last year, do you know what might have what happened to her?” Losing an animal is never funny, especially with the price of cattle these days, but it is difficult to diagnose what potentially could have happened to cause the animal to die, especially if it happened six, eight or even 10 months ago. When attempting to diagnose problems with livestock we have to factor in several things, such as the animal’s age, her body condition, her nutrition level and, of course, her environment. One condition that seems to crop up at this time of year when we have lush, green grasses out in the pastures is the condition known as grass tetany.Grass tetany (grass stagger or hypomagnesemic tetany) is a condition that is associated with low levels of magnesium in the animal blood system. It typically occurs during gestation (pregnancy) or during lactation. One of the common names for grass tetany is “grass staggers.” The condition gets that name due to the symptoms that it causes in the animal, such as nervousness, muscle twitching, staggering and convulsions. The exact cause of this condition is unknown, but it generally occurs in the spring when cool season forages like wheat, oats, ryegrass and other cool season species are available, and when the weather is cool and cloudy.Typically heavier textured soils that are low in (Mg) magnesium and (P) phosphorus and high in (K) potassium and (N) nitrogen are the areas where we tend to see grass tetany. Livestock producers can avoid this problem with a few preventative measures. The most simple solution is to supplement with a high magnesium mineral. These minerals contain magnesium oxides and can help offset the deficiencies in the grasses. This mineral supplement can be fed free-choice and is available at most farm stores and feed dealers. Applying dolomitic lime (ag lime) to pastures will also help reduce the instances of grass tetany. Ag lime contains a certain level of magnesium, and it can also help with the nutrient uptake by plants in acidic soils. It is also recommended not to start grazing until grass has reached six to eight inches in height. Dry cows, heifers, stocker cattle and cows nursing calves more than four months old are less susceptible than cows in heavy lactation.And lastly, pastures with a high amount of legumes in them, such as burclover, have high magnesium levels and can help compensate for the lack of it in lush grass.Animals that have been down for 12 hours or longer are poor candidates for successful treatment due to muscle damage that may prevent these animals from rising even if their magnesium status is corrected.Treatment is often complicated, and livestock producers are encouraged to contact their local veterinarian immediately if they suspect grass tetany is in an animal.Source - http://www.sealynews.com/

06.03.2014

USA - Extreme freeze damages Ontario vineyards

Freezing temperatures across Ontario have damaged vines in the Canadian province's vineyards, with some producers reporting bud loss of around 90%.Producers in two of Ontario's three wine appellations are already facing a smaller 2014 harvest after reporting severe bud loss in the past few weeks. 'Our winery has 95 to 98% bud loss, so we won’t be getting grapes this year,' says Tom O’Brien, owner of Cooper’s Hawk Vineyards in Lake Erie North Shore. That appellation shows the most damage, with an average bud loss of 86 to 90% across all varieties, according to Brock University’s Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute (CCOVI).Meanwhile, average bud loss in Niagara Peninsula ranges from 34% for Pinot Noir to 66% for Syrah, according to CCOVI, although Chardonnay, Riesling, Pinot Noir and Cabernet Franc fared better.The full extent of the damage from this recent cold weather is not yet known, and pruning strategies can be adjusted to mitigate some bud losses. In Ontario's Prince Edward County appellation, most vines are buried until spring to protect them from harsh winters. Sally Peck, owner of Sugarbush Vineyards there, said, 'More than 90 per cent bud loss would occur this year if vines weren’t buried.' Ron Giesbracht, professor for wine and viticulture at Niagara College, told Decanter.com, 'Bud counts aren’t the only measure of damage. Trunk damage from severe cold can also reduce crops in the current and subsequent vintage. So it’s too soon to know the extent of the damage.'It is hoped that a bumper crop in 2013 can offset expected shortfalls in 2014.Source - http://www.decanter.com/

05.03.2014

USA - Crop insurance decision time

March 15 is the deadline to purchase crop insurance for the 2014 crop year for corn, soybeans and spring wheat in Minnesota and other Upper Midwest states. As of March 1, the USDA Risk Management Agency (RMA) has finalized the 2014 crop prices in the Upper Midwest for Yield Protection (YP) policies, as well as the base prices for Revenue Protection (RP and RPE) policies. The 2014 established YP, RP and RPE prices are $4.62 per bushel for corn, $11.36 per bushel for soybeans and $6.51 per bushel for spring wheat. By comparison, the 2013 base prices for crop insurance coverage were $5.65 per bushel for corn, $12.87 per bushel for soybeans and $8.44 per bushel for spring wheat.A good crop insurance program is a key part of a solid risk management plan for most farm businesses. Farm operators have many crop insurance options and choices available to them, including YP, RP or RPE insurance polices, enterprise or optional units, the trend-adjusted APH option, as well as the level of insurance coverage to choose. All of the various crop insurance options and alternatives have premium costs associated with them. Crop insurance premiums are partially subsidized by the Federal Government, with the coverage levels of 80% or lower subsidized at a higher level than the 85% coverage level. Crop insurance premiums in many areas will likely be lower in 2014, as compared to comparable 2013 premium levels.Following are some crop insurance choices that are available, as well as the typical differences in the 2014 insurance options, estimated premium costs, and potential coverage amounts at average yield levels for corn and soybeans in Southern Minnesota:- Yield Protection (YP) or Revenue Protection (RP or RPE) insurance coverage. The YP policy option provides for yield only insurance protection, based on historic actual production history (APH) yields on a given farm unit. The RP or RPE policy option provides for a guaranteed minimum dollars of gross revenue per acre (yield x price), based on yield history (APH) and the average CBOT prices for December corn futures and November soybean futures during the month of February. The biggest difference is that YP policies only protect against yield reductions, while RP or RPE policies protect against revenue reductions from a combination of yield losses and lower levels of average grain prices in October 2014. About 90% of Midwest producers utilize RP or RPE policies, which seems like a solid option.- Revenue Protection (RP) or Revenue Protection with Harvest Price Exclusion (RPE) insurance policies. RP and RPE policies function essentially in the same manner, except that the RPE policy guarantees are not affected by harvest prices. The minimum revenue guarantee (yield and price) for both RP and RPE policies is fixed, based on the February CBOT prices for corn and soybeans. The main difference is that RP policies allow the final revenue guarantee to increase, based on the October CBOT average prices for corn and soybeans, while the RPE policies cannot be increased later. This difference came into play in 2012, with large crop losses from the drought, causing the October prices to increase significantly from the February prices. If the October price is lower than the February price, the RPE policies will usually have a higher net payout than similar RP policies, due to the RPE premiums being a few dollars per acre lower at comparable insurance coverage levels. For most corn and soybean producers, the more complete safety net offered by the RP policy is probably the best choice for 2014.- Enterprise or Optional Units. A few years ago, the USDA RMA increased the federal subsidy for purchasing insurance coverage under enterprise units, which combines all acres of a crop in a given county into one crop insurance unit. By comparison, optional units allow producers to insure crops separately in each township section. Many producers that previously used optional units have switched to enterprise units, due to large premium savings. However, it is important for producers to remember that enterprise units are based on larger coverage areas, and may not necessarily cover losses from hail, wind or flooding from isolated storms, which could affect individual farm units. Producers should analyze their particular farm units before making a final decision on enterprise units or optional units.- Trend-Adjusted Actual Production History (TA-APH) Yield Endorsement. The TA-APH yield endorsement option is available corn, soybeans and wheat in 2014 on a county basis in parts of numerous States, including large portions of Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, North and South Dakota and encompassing most major corn and soybean producing counties in the region. Many producers will be able to significantly enhance their insurance coverage by utilizing the TA-APH option, with only slightly higher premium costs. The TA-APH endorsement appears to be a very good crop insurance strategy for corn, soybeans, and wheat in the eligible areas.- The best level of insurance coverage to select. For YP, RP and RPE crop insurance policies, insurance coverage levels of 50% to 85% of the insurance guarantee are available. The premium increases for each incremental increase (5%) from 50% coverage to 80% coverage levels are fairly small, due to the higher level of Federal subsidies, meaning that the level of insurance coverage can be enhanced substantially with a minimal extra investment in insurance premiums. The 85% coverage levels have higher relative premium levels, due to the lower Federal subsidy rate. Given the uncertainty surrounding the 2014 crop year, with the potential for both yield and price risk, it may be a good time to seriously consider the 80% or 85% RP crop insurance options for the coming year. Producers are encouraged to discuss the various insurance options, as well as other 2014 crop insurance needs and alternatives, with their crop insurance agent before making the final decision. Source - http://cornandsoybeandigest.com/

of 1225