NEWS
584
of 1159
News
04.02.2019

Russia - Decreased agricultural production

In 2018, the general production volumes of agricultural commodities in Russia in all categories of agricultural households totaled nearly 5.12 trln RUR in current prices, a decrease of 0.6% (or down 88 bln RUR) compared with the figures in the previous year. The figures decreased for the first time since 2012, reported the Federal State Statistics Service. At the same time, last year the production of livestock goods increased by 1.3% compared with 2017 (to almost 2.551 trln RUR), while plant growing goods — down 2.4% (to 2.569 trln RUR). As a reminder, the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia forecasted the growth of agricultural production in 2018 at the level of 1%. Source - https://www.apk-inform.com

04.02.2019

UK - Oilseed rape crop losses estimated at more than six per cent

There has been significant loss of this year’s planted oilseed rape area, with large regional differences being observed, according to a farmer survey by Kleffmann Group. The Kleffmann Group panel consists of 403 UK rape growers and calculates an original planted area in autumn 2018 of 581,030 hectares of winter rape. However, 68 farmers have reported failed crops amounting to 6.28 per cent of the total original planted area. This is 36,000 hectares lost. In the 2017/18 season, the percentage loss was 1.62 per cent so autumn 2018 has been much more hostile to rape survival by a factor of nearly four times, according to the survey. Significant regional differences were also noted from the survey; Scotland, for example, had the lowest area of oilseed rape lost at just 0.91 per cent of the original planted area, closely followed by the North East region at 1.36 per cent. The South East region had the highest area of failed crop at 12.6 per cent, followed by Yorkshire and the Humber region at 9.75 per cent. Between these extremes are the remaining regions; East Midlands suffered 3.5 per cent loss, South West, 4.34 per cent, West Midlands, 5.34 per cent and Eastern region, 7.29 per cent. Agrii agronomist and farmer David Felce, who covers Cambridgeshire and Bedfordshire says oilseed rape is ‘a very mixed bag’. “A lot is down to cabbage stem flea beetle, not helped by dry conditions last autumn. “Often where the crop had survived adult flea beetle damage, those crops are now showing high levels of larvae in the stem and some of those crops are looking a little ragged. If they are in the leaf petioles it is not quite so bad but if they are in the main stem – the meristem where the flower buds are forming that is of more concern.” When deciding whether to continue with an OSR crop, as well as CSFB damage there are other factors to bear in mind, says Mr Felce. “If you have also got a not particularly high plant population and black-grass and grass-weeds, the decision may be around is it worth nurturing the crop knowing you are going to struggle to control grass-weeds?” Source - https://www.fginsight.com

04.02.2019

India - After the deluge, the frost now leaves Vattavada farms frigid

At Vattavada, the famed cool-season vegetable cultivating village, Pappiyamma seems visibly perturbed. Like most of her ilk here, this small-scale farmer has lost almost all the yield from the previous two harvesting seasons. The yield of the prime season in August, which coincides with Onam, is usually the one that compensates for any losses in the second and third harvesting seasons that fall around November and January respectively. But in 2018, the August floods washed away the first season yield. The state-of-affairs did have an influence on the November yield too, which was only moderate. Frost takes a toll Then, calamity struck again in January with the frost burying all hopes of a good third-season yield. The crops damaged included beans, cabbage, and garlic. The claimants of the green pea crop have been the pests that the change in climate brought in. The farmers are in a fix now with the first season farming (in the next crop rotation) fast approaching in some months time. The second and third seasons, even otherwise, have many challenges with water scarcity restricting sowing to only those areas where there are irrigation facilities. Farming thus becomes a costlier task, for which the villagers depend on the moneylenders from Tamil Nadu who usually seek the yield in return at a price determined by them. The situation drives some farmers to even take up jobs as daily wage labourers. Moneylenders make hay But this year, with larger areas left uncultivable all through last year, farming for the upcoming season could be a tougher task. This could mean sterner influence of the moneylenders on the farmers. “But we are left with no other option,” says Murugan, whose bean crop has been lost to the frost. Whatever is left of the crops this year are also of no use now, say the farmers. Pappiyamma’s dried-up butter beans have no demand in the market. A large number of farms with beans cultivation have, therefore, been cleared and burnt. The farmers sensed no compensation would come their way and hence deemed it fit to clear the farms. Some farms with beetroot crops have been abandoned, as the tubers have sub-growth that are unfit for the market. Agriculture Department officials, however, feel the crop loss due to the frost was not as much as during the floods. According to them, the farmers feel the pinch more because the loss mostly happened in the areas where farming is done during the other two seasons. The department is planning immediate steps to counter lack of irrigation facilities, the sources there say. Though there are five streams in the forest that could be used for irrigation, the drought-like situation was mostly due to the stand of the Forest Department against construction of check dams, they say. Vattavada, thus, is in a sombre mood with uncertainty looming large over the fate of its sought-after organically produced vegetable yield. Source - https://www.thehindu.com

04.02.2019

USA - Peanut growers consider 2019 crop outlook after hurricane losses

As area farmers make plans to attend the annual Alabama-Florida Peanut Trade Show on Thursday, losses from last season are fresh on their minds. Ken Barton, executive director of the Florida Peanut Producers Association, said farmers are in recovery mode from the damage caused by Hurricane Michael and a tremendous amount of rain. Damage categories in the more than $300 million in total agricultural losses caused by Michael in southeast Alabama included corn, cotton, farm infrastructure, horticulture, irrigation infrastructure, livestock, peanut, pecan, pine straw, poultry, soybean and timber. Some field work has already begun as farmers are concerned about the price they’ll receive for their upcoming crop. Barton said peanut contract offers have been limited so far and “what contracts have been offered are not that attractive as far as pricing goes.” Farmers in the tri-states area usually rotate peanuts with cotton and corn and normally plant about the same number of acres of peanuts every year because of the rotational requirements, Barton said. Part of the problem is the rising cost of fertilizer and other inputs it takes to produce the crop. “It seems to escalate every year,” Barton said. “Now we’re taking even less of a price for what we’re producing.” A positive point is the farm bill Congress passed in December that will provide more than $400 billion for agriculture subsidies, conservation programs, and food aid. The bill provides a safety net that will give farmers some certainty on what they might expect if prices continue to plunge, Barton said. “It also gives the lending institutions some certainty as well.” The peanut trade show, sponsored by the Alabama Peanut Producers Association and the Florida Peanut Producers Association, will be held at the National Peanut Festival Fairgrounds in Dothan. Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and a free, catered lunch will begin at noon, with a short program to follow. Peanut growers from Alabama and Florida who attend can view industry products and services offered by over 70 exhibitors. Dr. Marshall Lamb, from the National Peanut Research Lab, will speak to growers during the lunch program about the 2019 crop outlook as well as the current market status. Over $20,000 in door prizes will be given out throughout the morning of the trade show. Winners must be certified peanut farmers with a Farm Service Agency farm number. Source - https://www.dothaneagle.com

01.02.2019

Vietnam - Bitter days for Delta farmers

In Soc Trang Province, traders are buying sugarcane in Cu Lao Dung District for VND200 – 300 a kilo, a record-low price. The islet district, which is the province’s largest sugarcane producer, has about 2,300ha of sugarcane for the 2018-19 crop. Tran Vu Lan, who plants 1.2ha of sugarcane in Cu Lao Dung’s Dai An 1 Commune, said the low price of sugarcane and the high cost of hiring workers for harvesting have caused a loss of VND20 million (US$860) per hectare. Some farmers whose fields are not near roads have not harvested their sugarcane this year to save money on hiring workers and transport, he said. Huynh Minh Dung, a sugarcane trader in Dai An 1, said the price was low in the last crop and sugar companies have deferred payment to farmers for the current crop. “Farmers sometimes do not get their money even after one month of selling their sugarcane,” he said. In Tra Vinh Province, farmers in Tra Cu District have suffered losses for the second consecutive year. The yield of sugarcane in the district is about 80 – 85 tonnes per hectare in this crop, down 15 tonnes against the last crop. Because farmers suffered losses in the previous crop, they had less money to invest in their fields, causing a decline in yield. Kien Phume, who has harvested a 06.ha sugarcane field in Tra Cu’s Ngai Xuyen Commune, said she lost more than VND20 million ($860) for this crop. Tra Cu, which accounts for about 80 per cent of the sugarcane growing area in Tra Vinh, planted more than 3,500ha of sugarcane in the 2018-19 sugarcane crop, down 1,500ha against the last crop, according to the district’s Division of Agriculture and Rural Development. Shift to other crops Le Hong Phuc, chairman of the Tra Cu People’s Committee, said the decline of sugarcane prices had caused farmers to shift to grow other crops or to breed fish and shrimp. Because of declining sugarcane prices, the district has had difficulty encouraging farmers to keep their sugarcane fields. In the past, sugarcane was the most profitable crop planted in the saltwater-infected areas in Tra Cu. The province’s Department of Agriculture and Rural Development has given guidance to farmers in ways to improve yield and quality, and reduce production costs. The department has worked with the Department of Science and Technology to conduct research on new sugarcane varieties that have high yield and sugar content. The Department of Agriculture and Rural Development has also encouraged farmers to use machines and advanced farming techniques and participate in co-operatives so they can access State support policies. Many farmers in Soc Trang Province have switched from sugarcane varieties used to produce sugar to varieties for sugarcane juice. Le Van Dan, who has switched mostly to sugarcane used for juice in Cu Lao Dung District, said he earned a profit of VND7- 8 million ($300 - 344) per 1,000sq.m. Nguyen Van Dac, deputy head of the Cu Lao Dung District Agriculture and Rural Development Division, said: “The current low price of sugarcane will cause problems for farmers, so the district is planning to shift sugarcane areas to other crops.” The district expects to shift about 1,100ha of sugarcane to other crops this year, he said. Last year the district turned more than 950ha of sugarcane to grow other crops. In Cu Lao Dung’s sugarcane growing areas which are located near roads, district authorities have encouraged farmers to maintain their sugarcane planting areas that grow sugarcane varieties used for juice or varieties used for both sugar and sugarcane juice. In areas far from roads, district authorities have encouraged sugarcane farmers to switch to growing fruits and vegetables or breeding aquatic species. Many former sugarcane fields that have grown other crops in the last two years have yielded good profits for farmers in Cu Lao Dung, according to the district’s Division of Agriculture and Rural Development. Source - https://english.vietnamnet.vn

01.02.2019

Belgium - Hope for a good end, despite the disappointing Brussels sprout market

“We have a good period for Brussels sprouts behind us. However, at the moment, auction prices are meager. Normally, when there is winter weather, the demand is good. This reflects in the prices received at auction", says BelOrta's Guy Jennes. “The current auction price for medium-sized Brussels sprouts is very low. The larger sizes are getting better prices, but it is still too little. We are living in hope that the markets will recover soon. Various growers have indicated that their harvests are smaller. This is due to this past summer's dry weather. These smaller volumes should have a positive effect on the market as well as price formations." Hand-washed BelOrta also offers hand-washed Brussels sprouts. This is in addition to the usual machine-washed kind. This is in contrast to the Netherlands. There, mainly machine-washed Brussels sprouts are on offer. "The hand-washed product is trimmed with smaller knives. This results in a wholly intact product. The larger sizes of these hand-washed Brussels sprouts are especially popular in Germany", explains Guy. "Some of the Brussels sprouts will be sent to distant places. In certain countries, hand-washed Brussels sprouts are highly regarded. Recently, the exports to these countries have also been noticeably lower than three weeks ago. I do not know whether it is coincidental or not." Besides the standard Brussels sprouts, BelOrta also has flower sprouts and purple sprouts in its assortment. These special varieties are popular with German retail traders. Their volumes, however, remain limited. Kasgroenten “There is a good market for tomatoes. There are not very large volumes of Belgian tomatoes. However, this also has to do with competition from the south. Here, Spain sets the pace for how prices form. At auction we have, however, noticed that tomatoes from that country do well." "We also sold the first cucumbers this week. It is still difficult to estimate prices. This is because, here too, the southern countries set the pace. The Belgian volumes are still too low. However, in about three weeks, the farmers will get going. The first aubergines will start trickling in from now and over the next two weeks. So, the greenhouse vegetable season is gradually getting started again," continues Jennes. Chicory “Other cabbage varieties, leeks, and the various lettuce varieties are currently doing better. This is in contrast to the Brussels sprouts. Chicory's price formation, on the other hand, is a lean creature. It was expected that the supply would be much lower internationally. This was, again, because of the hot summer. There is, however, sufficient product available at the moment," concludes Guy. Source - https://www.freshplaza.com

01.02.2019

Australia - Western wheat region set for hot, dry weather

Australia's west coast is facing hot, dry weather over the next three months, the country's bureau of meteorology said on Thursday (Jan 31), denting the outlook for wheat production in the world's fourth largest exporter. There is only a 20 per cent chance that the state of Western Australia will receive average rainfall between Feb 1 and Apr 30, Australia's Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) said in its latest three-month outlook. There is also a 70 per cent chance that the majority of Australia will experience above average temperatures over the coming three months, the bureau said. The climate outlook undermines the outlook for Australia's wheat production next season. Western Australia is the country's largest wheat growing region, producing up to half of total national production. "Western Australia produced a great crop last year because it had good pre-season rains. If the outlook materialises, all soil moisture will be eradicated," said Phin Ziebell, agribusiness analyst, National Australia Bank. Australian farmers begin sowing crops in early April. While some growers could decide to sow later in the hope of a break in the dry weather, late planting would increase the susceptibility of crops to harsh weather further into the season. A record-breaking heat-wave across southeastern Australia earlier this month triggered power outages in some areas and sent power prices soaring, while bushfires have destroyed homes in the southern island state of Tasmania. Source - http://www.blackseagrain.net

01.02.2019

Germany - Launch of a parametric agriculture solution

Bermuda-based property and casualty insurer and reinsurer, Sompo International Holdings Ltd., has announced the introduction of a new innovative agriculture insurance product for the German market, in partnership with German insurer SV SparkassenVersicherung (SV). The new solution, called SV ErnteIndex, has been tailored to the agricultural sector and offers parametric protection against crop losses caused by drought, heavy frost or prolonged wet weather. An announcement on the new solution explains that payment is based on a ten-year average crop yield index for the district in which the farm is situated, alongside yield and market price projections that are determined by the farmer at the time of purchase. Being structured to payout based on a parametric trigger means that it is much faster and simpler to assess a claim and subsequently payout when compared with more traditional insurance products. The typical contract duration is twelve months, and the product is able to be used for a variety of both conventional and organic crops. Senior Vice President, Global Agriculture for Sompo International, Kris Lynn said: “Through our partnership with SV, we are delighted to bring SV ErnteIndex to the market. This product offers German farmers a simple but effective insurance cover to protect their crops. In catastrophic years such as 2018 when severe drought devastated crop yields, farmers will realize the true value of multi-peril crop insurance.” Sompo International and SV have been business partners since 2006, and entered into a strategic partnership in 2018 around the introduction of new insurance solutions to the agriculture sector. Dr. Klaus Zehner, member of the Board of Management for Property/Casualty at SV, added: “The ErnteIndex now offers a solution in which the farmer himself decides how to insure his risks. In addition, we are in discussions with the state to provide additional incentives to make this product even more attractive to farmers.” Source - https://www.reinsurancene.ws

01.02.2019

Attritional losses drive $198m Q4 net loss for AXIS

Bermudian re/insurance group AXIS Capital Holdings has announced a $198 million net loss for the fourth quarter of 2018, driven by heavy attritional property and catastrophe activity. This $198 million Q4 net loss, with a 117.3% Combined Ratio (CR), compares to the $38 million net loss and 100.7% CR reported in 2017 for the same time period. Pre-tax catastrophe and weather-related losses were $92 million primarily attributable to Hurricane Michael and the California Wildfires in Q4, compared to $34 million in the same period in 2017. For the full year 2018, the company reported a $0.4 million net income, an improvement on the $416 million net loss for the same period in 2017. Net premiums written increased by 16% to $4.7 billion, year-on-year. Adjusting for the impact of the Novae acquisition, gross premiums written increased by $331 million, with an increase of $60 million in the insurance segment, and an increase of $271 million in the reinsurance segment. Operating loss for Q4 2018 was $148 million, compared to an operating income of $20 million for Q4 2017. For the year ended 31 December 2018, AXIS reported operating income of $161 million, compared to an operating loss of $265 million for the same period in 2017. An underwriting loss of $46.5 million for 2018 included the recognition of premium attributable to Novae’s balance sheet at 2 October 2017, without the recognition of the associated acquisition costs, which were written off at the closing date. The absence of $7 million of acquisition costs related to premiums earned in the fourth quarter of 2017 benefited the acquisition cost ratio by 1.1%. “In 2018, we delivered improved full-year underwriting performance, both with and without cats,” said Albert Benchimol, President and Chief Executive Officer of AXIS Capital. “Following three quarters in which we achieved tangible progress toward delivering on our financial goals, however, heavy attritional property and catastrophe activity led to unsatisfactory results in the fourth quarter. “Throughout the past year we took a number of significant actions to strengthen our portfolio and, over the past few months, we’ve accelerated these initiatives. Additionally, we anticipate that recent improvements in pricing and market discipline will also have a positive impact on the pace of our improvements.” “2018 was a year in which we made significant progress in advancing our strategy and in strengthening our business,” he added. “We furthered our relevance and positioning in key markets, including transitioning our London operations to a leading position at Lloyd’s with the integration of Novae, and we scaled up a transformation program that is improving our efficiency and our agility in a rapidly evolving market.” Source - https://www.reinsurancene.ws

31.01.2019

India - Modi’s ambitious crop insurance scheme is failing

In 2016, the Narendra Modi government replaced existing crop insurance schemes with the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana. The new scheme was advertised as incorporating the best features of earlier schemes while removing all their shortcomings. Unveiling the guidelines of the PMFBY, Modi attributed low enrolment in crop insurance to farmers’ “lack of faith” in previous schemes. A rapid increase in enrolment was to be the hallmark of the PMFBY. The target was to cover 50% of the cropped area, about 98 million hectares, by 2018-’19. But in 2017-’18, the second year of the PMFBY, the enrolment numbers fell sharply, taking the coverage to below 2015 levels. Against the target of 50% for 2018-’19, the coverage stands at less than 26% in 2017-’18. Why did the coverage shrink? This analysis takes a closer look at the Modi government’s failure at expanding insurance coverage for farmers and the governance issues that it reveals. What does the data show? Prior to the introduction of the PMFBY in 2016-’17, the number of farmers and cropped area insured had been sequentially increasing. This trend continued through the first year of the PMFBY. What is noteworthy is the sharp fall in numbers in 2017-’18. The government has been reluctant to put out the 2018 kharif enrolment data even several months after the end of the monsoon season. The reason for this reluctance can be found in a recent reply to a Right to Information query. As on October 10, 2018, according to the reply, enrolment was down 10% from even 2017 levels. This data does not include enrolment in Bihar, but even after data for that state is included, 2018 kharif enrolment will fall short of 2017. Can growing coverage be equated with insurance gaining popularity? In uninformed commentary, increasing coverage is equated with insurance gaining popularity with farmers. This is not necessarily true in the context of crop insurance in India because of the strong element of coercion exerted on farmers to take crop insurance cover. Crop loans are given almost entirely by public sector financial institutions and cooperative banks which, following government directives, automatically deduct insurance premium from the loans they make to the farmer. Compelling farmers to take insurance provides a dual benefit from the government’s point of view. First, it ensures a minimum number of captive customers to make crop insurance viable. Second, the insurance serves as collateral for the farmer’s loan, since any insurance payout in the event of crop loss is routed through the same financial institution. The government counts farmers whose insurance premium is deducted compulsorily from a crop loan as “loanee farmers” and all the others as “non-loanee farmers”. An increase in the number of crop loans or government pressure on banks for full compliance can increase the number of loanee farmers. But the real data of interest is the number of farmers who take insurance voluntarily. Farmers enrolling voluntarily could be those who have never taken loans or who have taken loans in the past but not in the current season. Those who have never taken loans face several obstacles to enrolling, including access to insurers and the ability to produce documentation such as sowing certificates and land records. Those who have taken loans in the past presumably have access to all the above and should not find it a problem to enrol voluntarily if they so desire. Has there been a ‘quantum jump’ in voluntary enrolment of farmers? It seems the government is keen to show the PMFBY is more popular with farmers than earlier schemes. The agriculture secretary recently claimed that after the PMFBY was rolled out in 2016, there has been a “quantum jump” in voluntary enrolment. He was repeating a claim first made in a press release by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare on December 7, 2016. The ministry claimed the number of non-loanee farmers which was only 1.5 million in kharif 2015 had jumped to 10.2 million in kharif 2016. But data available publicly tells a different story. The graph below is based on the Comptroller and Auditor General’s performance audit of agriculture crop insurance schemes, 2017, barring data for 2017 and 2018, which is taken from answers to queries posed in the Lok Sabha in Octoberand under the RTI Act. Kharif accounts for roughly two-thirds of the insured farmers and cropped area. Nearly 9.8 million non-loanee farmers were insured in kharif 2015 as per the 2017 audit. This is conformed in a recent paper by Ashok Gulati, former chairman of the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices, who attributes the data to industry sources. The important takeaway from the chart is that non-loanee numbers have barely changed since 2015, remaining in the range of 10-11 million. There has been no “quantum jump”. What explains the data discrepancy? The numbers for 2015 reported by the agriculture ministry in December 2016 are completely at variance with those in the Comptroller and Auditor General’s report, which attributes its data to the Department of Agriculture Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare. This means the ministry revised the 2015 numbers after the first season of the PMFBY in 2016. Clues to the nature of the revision are available in the RTI response of October 10 which shows the number of non-loanee farmers in Maharashtra to be under 0.2 million in 2015-’16 as against 8.2 million reported by Maharashtra’s government officials. A 2005 Bombay High Court judgement prohibits the deduction of premium from farmers taking loans in Maharashtra without their consent. Farmers giving their consent as well as those taking crop loans and insurance from different institutions are all reported as non-loanee farmers by insurers.According to Maharashtra government officials, a very high percentage of insured farmers have been counted in the non-loanee category in the state for many years. Maharashtra typically accounts for more than half of non-loanee farmers across India in any year. It appears the ministry has changed the definition of “non-loanee” as applicable to Maharashtra in a way that has resulted in the “quantum jump”. Questions about the numbers quoted in the agriculture ministry’s press release of December 2016 have been raised by the Centre for Science and Environment in its 2017 report on PMFBY and directly with government officials, with no answers forthcoming. If the numbers supplied to the Comptroller and Auditor General were wrong and the ministry has revised them since, doesn’t it owe a public clarification? What does the sharp fall in enrolment in 2017 indicate? Now, let’s return to the matter of the fall in coverage. An embarrassed government has gone to great lengths to dispel the idea that this could be attributed to farmers’ dissatisfaction with the PMFBY. It has advanced two reasons. One is that when states announce farm loan waivers, farmers keep payments on old loans pending, making them ineligible for new loans. This would mean a lesser number of farmers applying for new crop loans. Two, the introduction of Aadhaar seeding in the loan approval process has eliminated the practice of farmers taking multiple loans for the same crop. These reasons could account for the lower number of insurance policies linked to loans, that is, the lower number of loanee farmers, the government claims. An analysis of kharif data shows the number of insured farmers came down not only in Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh, which announced farm loan waivers, but in seven other states. These nine states account for over 80% of the farmers insured in kharif 2016. Jharkhand, Odisha, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Telangana bucked the trend, but these accounted for just a little over 10% of the insured in that season. The loan waiver argument advanced by the government begs the question: why is it that farmers who did not get loan-linked insurance (since they did not take loans) not voluntarily opt for insurance if this was to their benefit? Rather than an increase in non-loanee enrolment, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and West Bengal saw a significant fall. Other states saw negligible change. News reports suggest that farmers are unhappy with the PMFBY because of delays in the settlement of claims and the lack of avenues for redress. There are even instances of farmers taking collective action to oppose mandatory deduction of insurance premiums. The drop in 2017 enrolment may have more to do with this than the government cares to acknowledge. Has governance improved with PMFBY? The quality and timely availability of data in the public domain is a window to the quality of supervision by the government. How does the government measure up on this account? There are blatant errors in the data put out by the agriculture ministry. For example, the number of farmer beneficiaries in Rajasthan in kharif 2016 is indicated as 18.7 million on the PMFBY website though the total number of insured farmers in the state is only 10.1 million. The total number of kharif 2016 beneficiaries is shown as 25.8 million though the real number is around 10 million. These errors have been repeated in a reply to a question raised in Parliament in August 2018. It appears no one in the ministry even glances at the data. Insurance premium deducted from farmers is almost exclusively handled by public sector financial institutions and service centres. Yet, final kharif 2018 enrolment figures have not been released, though the official period for claims settlement is over. The government took eight months after enrolment would have been completed to provide figures for rabi 2017-’18. It is imperative for farmers that their claims of crop loss for any season are settled before the start of the next season – and the PMFBY guidelines on claims settlement recognise this. Yet, the government is unable to provide even provisional claims data for rabi 2017-’18 when we are in the midst of rabi 2018-’19, indicating huge delays in settling claims. The delays are of course confirmed by reports from the ground. The delayed availability of data, frequent revisions and blatant errors all point to poor systems and oversight of the crop insurance programme by the Modi government. Farmers may have lacked faith in earlier insurance schemes, but the PMFBY has done nothing to restore it. Source - https://scroll.in

31.01.2019

USA - Grape growers look to offset losses from smoke

A winegrape-growing region wracked by wildfires wants to learn more about the impact smoke has on grapes, while growers look to crop insurance and disaster relief to offset some of their losses. After the Mendocino Complex fire burned more than 459,000 acres of land in Lake and Mendocino counties last year, Lake County growers suffered an estimated $37.1 million in losses from smoke damage, according to a survey by the Lake County Winegrape Commission. Loss figures for Mendocino County are still being calculated, said Bernadette Byrne, executive director of Mendocino Winegrowers. The Lake County Winegrape Commission launched a research project last fall aimed at furthering understanding of the effects of wildfire smoke on grapes and wines. The project includes regional sampling, testing, data gathering, weather- and fire-related GIS modeling, and sensory analysis, said Debra Sommerfield, commission president. Project partners include the commission, University of California Cooperative Extension, UC Davis, ETS Laboratories, the Australian Wine Research Institute, Western Weather Group, Lake County Air Quality Management District and individual winegrape growers and vintners. "We hope our collaborative research project will help develop a more precise understanding of wildfire impacts on winegrapes," Sommerfield said. "It's our intent to support innovative new findings that will expand the understanding of impacts and to set a precedent for the importance of future research across Northern California." Additional research is underway at UC Davis, where a viticulture and enology extension specialist hopes to learn more about winemaking techniques that would prevent smoky flavors from hurting the wine. About 75 percent of vineyards statewide were covered by crop insurance in 2018, said Keith Brandt, president of the Lake County Farm Bureau, who added that 61 percent of vineyards in Lake County were insured. John Aguirre, president of the California Association of Winegrape Growers, said crop insurance proved to be "very important in instances of damage related to wildfires," including smoke exposure. "If grapes are exposed to smoke for a significant period of time, that can result in smoke compounds remaining with the grape, making those grapes potentially unusable for wineries," Aguirre said. Crop insurance is part of the federal farm bill and is overseen by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency, which helps cover the premiums, said Greg Merrill, executive vice president of Pan American Insurance in Fresno. Insurance covers the crop, not the vines or trees, against naturally occurring perils. For winegrapes, a grower can insure anywhere from 50 percent to 85 percent of their average crop; other crops typically range from 50 percent to 75 percent. A grape grower needing to file a claim must do so within 72 hours of knowledge of potential damage, Merrill said, and if the claim is for smoke damage, several steps must be taken. "In order to have a valid claim process, you need to have your crop sampled and tested preharvest," he said. "You don't necessarily have to have the results of that test prior to harvest. You just need to be able to prove and certify the fact that you took that sample preharvest by an independent lab." The test will look for elevated levels of guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol, Merrill said. Elevated levels of both must be present and a winery must have rejected the grapes on grounds of smoke exposure. The policy will pay a claim only if the fruit cannot be used for its intended purpose, he added. For winegrapes, there's also a quality adjustment loss to cover instances where the tonnage is unaffected but the crop is damaged by smoke. "When you have smoke taint, the fruit very likely still looks good," Merrill said. "It's an invisible damage." If the grapes can't be sold for wine anywhere, a full claim is likely paid, he said; however, if they're sold for wine but at a much lower price than expected, quality loss adjustment comes into play. An unharvested-acreage deduction could also be applied. If the crop looks fine but testing shows smoke exposure and the winery rejects it, a per-ton deduction will apply to a claim payment if the crop isn't harvested for wine—even though the unsold fruit still needs to be removed from the vine anyway to make way for next year's crop. "Here's where it's getting to be a hot topic and a bone of contention based on last year, especially in Lake and Mendocino counties," Merrill said. "Technically, did the grower remove the fruit from the vine? Yes. Doesn't that seem like that's technically a harvest of sorts? I would say yes. But the USDA says no, that ultimately the fruit needed to be removed and used for its intended purpose. All the insurance carriers must play by the same set of rules as guided by the USDA, so agents, carriers and growers are all at the mercy of these guidelines." A disaster-aid bill before Congress would provide emergency funding to Lake and Mendocino county grape growers affected by smoke damage, under an amendment from Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena. Aguirre said assistance would be greater for growers who carried crop insurance. "Assuming Congress passes this disaster-assistance bill and the president signs the bill, that assistance would be available to growers affected by wildfire this past year in California, as well as potentially other states," Aguirre said. The deadline to apply for crop insurance for the 2019 growing season comes this week, Jan. 31. Merrill said a signed application needs to be submitted to an insurance agent by that date. Given the risks to winegrapes not just from wildfires, but from flood, frost, invasive pests and diseases, Aguirre said he considers crop insurance an important investment. "I just think it's really critical for people to utilize crop insurance as a risk-management tool, but at a minimum, get the catastrophic, or cat, coverage," he said. Source - http://agalert.com

31.01.2019

Belgium - Maybe leek farmers have not yet forgotten last year

After the crisis at the start of last year, it is going well on the leek market this year. "There is sufficient supply but not too much. That is doing the prices good", says Rik Decadt of the Belgian auction house. "On Monday morning, the prices were between EUR065 and EUR070 per kg. Last week they were between EUR070 and EUR075 per kg. When we look at last year's prices at around this time, they were lower by more than half." “We are, however, expecting a slight dip in the leek supply next week. After the snow and thaw, the lands are wet. This makes grubbing a little difficult", explains Rik. “Demand has peaked considerably lately. Consumption rises, especially when there is winter weather outside. In recent weeks, demand has been high in both Belgium as well as Europe. Just as in Belgium, the whole of Europe has a shortage of leeks. This is as a result of last summer's dry weather." The last leek season had a very good autumn. This is in contrast to this season. This led to a catastrophic first two months of the year. There were high production rates and no shortages. “The leek acreage is less this year than last year. This acreage is expected to remain stable for the time being. Perhaps the leek growers have not yet forgotten what happened last season. Maybe they are not planting too many additional leeks. We will just have to wait and see", concludes Rik. Source - https://www.freshplaza.com

31.01.2019

Spain - Broccoli shortage and very high prices expected until summer

This past weekend, Extremadura hosted the Agroexpo fair; an international event which brought together experts from the agricultural sector. One of them was Javier Bernabéu, secretary of the association +Brócoli, who gave a presentation about the present and future of broccoli in Spain. According to Bernabéu, the current campaign is being highly atypical, since too much was planted for the autumn harvest and too little for winter. This, together with the fact that heavy rains in November damaged some recently transplanted fields, is resulting in some shortages, which are reflected in quite high prices. "It appears that this situation could last until the summer, since there are currently fewer plantings than usual at this time," says the expert, who nevertheless also reported good news for the vegetable, namely that the broccoli acreage in Extremadura has grown from 1,500 hectares ten years ago to the current 5,000 hectares. Regarding the national production, Javier Bernabéu explains that there was a lot in October, November and December, which was good for a good Christmas campaign. "Exports started at their usual time and have been shipped regularly, and the demand is normal. All the contracts are being fulfilled, although in the lower limits, so nothing is left over," says the secretary of +Brócoli. Despite the aforementioned shortage, Bernabéu claims that consumption in Spain continues to grow at a good pace; a perception which he illustrated during his presentation with the following figure: on average, each Spaniard consumes a "kilo and a half of broccoli per year." This is a positive result, but what's the weight of broccoli in Spain's global agricultural economy? "It is clear that it is a social crop and with high labor needs, which contributes significantly to the social economy. Moreover, and according to official data, the prices obtained from the crop's export amount to around 1 € /kg (including all costs), which results in a good balance for the national economy," says Bernabéu . Also worth noting is the crop's prospects in the short term. In this regard, the significant growth of the productions in Extremadura and in the Ribera del Ebro during the autumn has made it possible to supply good quantities to the processing industry. Frozen broccoli is gaining ground and growing quicker than fresh broccoli. "At the moment, the processing industry must be saturated with frozen broccoli, but they won't have new productions until next autumn, with the exception of their own crops. That will possibly lead to shortages next summer." Source - https://www.freshplaza.com

31.01.2019

Israel - Very short Sharon fruit season this year

Sharon Fruit is arriving on the European market. “The first arrival was in week 4, and the last will be in week 7”, says Lior Gal from Galilee Export. “It is a very short season with much lower volumes than usual.” These lower volumes are due to the heat wave experienced in Israel during the Sharon fruit’s flowering season. “Many of the blossoms fell off”, Lior says. He said, “In a normal year we do about 1 500 tons, just for export”, he says. “So we have about 30% less.” Now, he adds, “We are getting normal prices. There is still Spanish Sharon fruit, here and there on the European market at the moment. However, some clients prefer the Israeli Sharon fruit as it is sweeter.” Israel only cultivates the Sharon Fruit variety of persimmon. Spain, on the other hand, has the Kaki Persimmon and the Rojo Brilliante. Spain also prolongs their season every year by a week. “I believe they have bigger volumes every year. They also manage to keep the fruit at a reasonable quality every year”, he says. Russia is a major client According to Lior, Galilee Export, which is owned by a cooperative of growers, is almost the only company in Israel exporting Sharon fruit this year. “We are one of the top three companies dealing with Sharon fruit”, he says. Their main clients are the UK, Belgium, and the Netherlands. “We also ship a lot to Russia”, Lior adds. He previously said that Israel’s primary market for this variety of persimmon is Russia. “That is the only place where our prices are an advantage”. He mentioned that 50% of Galilee Export’s Sharon Fruit goes to Russia. “The other 50% is mainly sent to the Netherlands and the UK.” “There is usually an increase in demand closer to the Chinese New Year, which is next week. Then there is a little bit of pressure on orders. After that, things return to normal”. He says they have such limited volumes, they will not be exporting to the Far East this year. Focused on Europe “We are focusing on Europe”, he explains. “There is also a market in Canada and the US for Israeli Sharon fruit. But, again, because it is such a short season, we did not export any fruit there this year. Next season, will hopefully have more volume and we will be able to ship to those countries again.” The local market for Sharon fruit is very strong. There is, however, a different demand from the domestic market compared to the export market. “Buyers in the local market likes large sizes. The smaller fruit is exported to Europe, the UK, and Russia. We get good returns on these smaller fruits, thanks to the export market." “In general, exports are reducing year on year”, says Lior. “This is because fewer growers are cultivating this exotic fruit. When you have less, prices rise in the local Israeli market and this then increases the competition on the export market. We have managed to get good returns for our growers the last few years on the export for smaller and medium-sized fruits. The larger fruits are sold on the local market.” Source - https://www.freshplaza.com

31.01.2019

Italy - What went wrong during the 2018 grape campaign

"The table grape campaign was characterized by generally low prices, unusual weather conditions and substandard product quality," explains Vittorio Fili, president of Associazione Regionale Pugliese dei Tecnici e Ricercatori in Agricoltura (ARPTRA). "The weather affected the cost of harvesting operations, so sales prices remained unvaried. Many producers had to deal with rot and therefore clean and sort bunches to bring high-quality produce to the tables." "Climate change is a problem for all crops and will be the source of more trouble. Excessive cold/heat, frequent rain/hailstorms or drought are extreme factors that are now recurrent. Despite the covers, long-cycle grapes will face physiological and phytosanitary problems (rot) difficult to control." "Technicians working in the Bari,  BAT (Barletta-Andria-Trani) and Taranto provinces - where crops cover around 35,000 hectares - manage to employ sustainable defense strategies therefore complying with the regulations of Regione Puglia. Grapes from Puglia are usually excellent, tasty, with the right sugar/acidity balance and few residues. At the moment, we are not so much worried about phytosanitary management but rather about physiological management when faced with unforeseen events." "Table grape consumption should be supported by supermarkets with better displays and packaging, not providing information that are too general (white/red grapes). Consumers are confused when dealing with information that demean all the work we do in the fields. Consumer trends are currently leaning towards medium-small bunches." Source - https://www.freshplaza.com

30.01.2019

Nigeria - Approval of its first GMO food crop

After nearly a decade of research by its own scientists, Nigeria has approved its first genetically modified (GM) food crop — pest-resistant cowpea. The National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA) decision to allow the environmental release of GM cowpea affirms the crop’s safety. It also paves the way for commercializing GM cowpea and making the seeds available to farmers. “Cowpea is the most important food grain legume in Nigeria,” said Prof. Ibrahim Abubakar, executive director of the Institute for Agricultural Research (IAR) at Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, which led the research. “The low yield of the crop in Nigeria is due to many constraints, particularly pod boring insects, which cause up to 90 percent yield loss in severe infestation cases.” Cowpea is an important source of protein for millions of Nigerians and others in West Africa. Farmers typically apply pesticides six or seven times within a planting season in an attempt to control the destructive pod borer (Maruca vitrata) pest. The GM cowpea, which provides built-in resistance to the insect, will significantly decrease pesticide use, researchers said. It will also increase yields by about 20 percent, helping Nigeria to reduce its reliance on imports and achieve food security. Nigeria currently imports about 500,000 tonnes of cowpea annually to meet demand. Both the pod borer-resistant (PBR) cowpea and GM cotton, which Nigeria commercialized last July, rely on a gene from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), a natural occurring, soil-borne bacteria long used in organic agriculture, to control certain insect pests. Nigerian scientists who introduced the Bt gene into local varieties of cowpea found it confers near complete protection against the pod borer. Abubakar said scientists decided to venture into genetic modification in cowpea breeding because pest infestations had made cowpea farming difficult, economically unprofitable and even dangerous, as farmers were exposed to pesticide sprays. Dr. Abdourhamane Issoufou, country director of the African Agricultural Technology Foundation (AATF), said Nigerian scientists worked with institutions in Ghana, Burkina Faso and Malawi to develop the Bt cowpea. Scientists in Ghana have completed field trials on PBR cowpea and will soon seek commercialization of the crop. Related article:  No rotten tomatoes—Can genetic engineering help create a tastier but still hardy fruit? “Today, Nigeria stands tall in the comity of nations for effectively managing and bringing to fruition this dream,” Issoufou said. Saidu Madagwa, executive secretary of the Agricultural Research Council of Nigeria (ARCN), which coordinates agricultural research in Nigeria, said the council was proud to present Nigerians with the first home-grown genetically modified food crop. He said it has passed all necessary scientific and safety tests. Prof. Ishiyaku Mohammad, principal investigator in IAR’s cowpea project, explained that the GM cowpea is no different than conventional varieties. The only distinguishing factor is its resistance to Maruca infestation, he said. “The legume, which tastes just the same as its conventional counterpart, does not have any killer gene,” he said and farmers can replant the seeds if they wish. Chief Daniel Okafor, vice president of All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN), said the organization’s members are joyful at news of the approval. Farmers are willing and ready to adopt developmental technologies that reduce losses, increase yields and improve their livelihoods, he said. Prof. Alex Akpa, acting director general of the National Agricultural Biotechnology Development Agency, said that with the approval, Nigeria “has registered her name among the global scientific community as a country capable of finding solutions to her challenges.” Source - https://geneticliteracyproject.org

584
of 1159
istanbul escort şişli escort tbilisi escort şişli escort şişli escort maslak escort istanbul escort beşiktaş escort taksim escort izmir escort ümraniye escort mecidiyeköy escort şişli escort taksim escort ümraniye escort kartal escort şirinevler escort maltepe escort istanbul escort ümraniye escort kadıköy escort vip escort mersin escort istanbul escorts ataköy escort avcılar escort beylikdüzü escort okmeydanı escort şişli escort tuzla escort işitme cihazı sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop sex shop
istanbul escort