NEWS
883
of 1225
News
09.03.2016

Chile - Algae bloom causing massive losses in the salmon farms

Last week the Norwegian company Marine Harvest, the largest salmon producer in the world, reported the deaths of about 1.2 million fish as a result of the algae being identified on their premises, located in the southern region of Los Lagos. This massive presence of algae has forced the National Marine Fisheries Service to activate their emergency protocols to avoid the severity of the situation, according to the Chilean media. “This summer’s climatic conditions have led to massive algae blooms, first in the north of Aysén and Central Chiloe and now in the Puerto Montt area, causing mortality through low oxygen and damage in the (fish) gills,” said the Chilean director of National Fisheries and Aquaculture, German Iglesias. According to newspaper La Tercera, the Camanchaca company estimates its losses at around 1.5 million fish, that’s around half of the firm’s total three million salmon crop. Total losses are valued at around US$22.2 million. Another firm hit was AquaChile, which reported the death of 2.3 million units of Atlantic salmon, at an estimated value of US$15 million. The company made clear that their affected product “does not have insurance against this risk.” So far, it is estimated that there are 19 salmon fisheries affected, with losses of around 12,700 tons of fish. In 2007, Chile became the second largest producer of salmon, surpassed only by Norway. But, the appearance of the ISA virus resulted in a large amount of deaths in the fish, causing a drastic reduction in production. The ISA virus only affects Atlantic salmon, resulting in the fish suffering internal bleeding. “This is extremely sad,” said Felipe Sandoval, president of SalmonChile, adding that this is a natural phenomenon that happens every year, but sometimes can be intensified. “We have not seen a similar situation since 2009.” SalmonChile also estimate that most of the fish that were affected by this phenomenon, should be harvested “in about eight months”. Industry sources say the loss of biomass will generate an upward adjustment in salmon prices due to the lower number of units in the market. The National Fisheries and Aquaculture (Sernapesca) reported that as the Chilean government has now activated a contingency plan to “facilitate the logistics of the farms affected by this phenomenon, specifically in relation to the transfer of the fish.” “We are having several ‘algal blooms’ in different sectors and we think that maybe this season they will continue to appear,” said Marcela Lara, assistant director of Aquaculture. Sandoval says that it is important to remember that “this is a natural phenomenon, it has nothing to do with the management of companies. It has to do with the weather and water conditions.” Source - en.mercopress.com

08.03.2016

Brazil - Is the impact of climate change on agriculture underestimated?

A new study looking into the dynamics between climate change and agricultural output found that only a third of production loss seen in Mato Grosso, Brazil over the last few years can be attributed to lower crop yields. The paper, written by Brown and Tufts university researchers suggests that we’ve been overlooking how two key human responses to climate — the total area farmed and the number of crops planted — will impact food production in the future. [caption id="attachment_52859" align="alignnone" width="1024"] Image via pexels.com[/caption] The paper, published in Nature Climate Change, focused on the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso, an emerging agricultural region that produced 10% of the global supply of soybeans as of 2013. By analyzing temperature and precipitation data from this area over an eight-year time period, the team calculated how sensitive the agricultural industry of the region is to climate change. Basing on these estimates, they projected that an increase of 1 degree Celsius will cause a 9 to 13 percent reduction in soy and corn output in Mato Grosso. “This is worrisome given that the temperature in the study region is predicted to rise by as much as 2 degrees by midcentury under the range of plausible greenhouse gas emissions scenarios,” said Avery Cohn, aassistant professor of environment and resource policy at Tufts, who led the work while he was a visiting researcher at Brown. The accuracy of these figures hinges of course on the assumption that patters observed in the past will hold true in the future. But study’s most alarming find however doesn’t come from crop yields alone, but from the mechanisms that drive changes in agricultural output. Most similar studies only look at how changes in a region’s climate influence crop yield, i.e. how much food is harvested from a unit of agricultural land. But if you only focus on this single variable you’ll miss the critical dynamics that affect overall output says Leah VanWey, professor of sociology at Brown and senior deputy director of the Institute at Brown for the Study of Environment and Society (IBES). “If you look at yields alone, you’re not looking at all of the information because there are economic and social changes going on as well,” VanWay, one of the study’s senior authors, said. “You’re not taking into account farmers’ reactions to climate shocks.” If yields decrease, farmers may be less inclined to farm the same area as it’s just not profitable anymore — a decrease in production per square meter means lower profits at harvest, but the farmer’s cost while growing the crop stays the same. Another factor that plays a part in decreasing overall production is be the reduction of number of crops per season. The planting of two successive crops on the same land in a growing season — known as double-cropping — is a common practice in Mato Grosso. If climate takes a shift for the worse and crops don’t grow, farmers may be inclined to save their money and effort for better times by not planting a second crop. For this study the team analyzed not only crop yield figures in the region, but also the yearly variation in field area and double cropping. Cohn and VanWey worked with Brown University Professor of earth, environmental and planetary sciences Jack Mustard and graduate student Stephanie Spera, who gathered satellite images of the Mato Grosso region from NASA’s MODIS satellite — which is used to monitor land cover and use around the world. They were able to identify cropland on these images as they turn green during the growing season but then quickly become brown as the plants are harvested. Two green stages in the same growing season was indicative of double-cropping. “The changes in cropping that we quantified with remotely sensed data were stunning,” Mustard said. “We can use those satellite data to better understand what’s happening from a climate, economic, and sociological standpoint.” [caption id="attachment_52853" align="alignnone" width="1024"] Satellite map showing variations in crop area and incidence of double cropping. Image credits NASA/Brown University.[/caption] The team found that an increase of 1 degree Celsius led to substantial decreases in total farmed area and in double cropping incidence. In fact, more than 70 percent of the overall loss in production can be attributed to these two factors, the paper concludes. Only the remaining 30 percent is attributable to lower crop yields. “Had we looked at yield alone, as most studies do, we would have missed the production losses associated with these other variables,” VanWey said. Cohn believes that the results suggest more traditional studies “may be underestimating the magnitude of the link between climate and agricultural production.” This hold true especially in countries that invest little in agricultural subsidies, such as Brazil. Here farmers are more dependent on the profitability of their crops and if yields drop, they just don’t have the money to farm the same area of land. “This is an agricultural frontier in the tropics in a middle-income country,” VanWey said. “This is where the vast majority of agricultural development is going to happen in the next 30 to 50 years. So understanding how people respond in this kind of environment is going to be really important.” VanWey said the next step might be to repeat this study it in the U.S. to see if increased subsidies or insurance help to guard against climate shocks. If so, it might inform policy decisions in emerging agricultural regions like Mato Grosso. “We may need to figure out a way to create incentives — credit products or insurance — that can reduce farmers’ responses to climate shocks,” VanWey said. Source - zmescience.com

08.03.2016

USA - Crop assistance program deadline approaches

Although many farmers carry insurance on their crops and livestock, insurance isn’t always available for everything that can be grown or produced. For example, with many specialty crops, such as vegetables and fruits, floriculture, nursery, or livestock forage, private insurance for losses from weather damage may not be available. That’s why the USDA’s Farm Service Agency offers help to producers through the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program, which provides financial assistance to producers of noninsurable crops when low yields, loss of inventory or prevented plantings occur because of natural disasters. The program has existed for 21 years. For the majority of that time, it provided only catastrophic coverage for losses of more than 50 percent of expected production. That catastrophic coverage – still available – pays 55 percent of the average market price. Today, not only does the program provide a safety net for specialty crop producers working to make healthy fruits and vegetables available to more consumers, the program also covers aquaculture, turf grass, ginseng, honey, syrup and even organic and energy crops. Higher levels of coverage are available for losses up to 65 percent of production and 100 percent of the average market price. Basic coverage fees are $250 per crop or $750 per producer per administrative county, whichever is less. No producer pays more than $1,875. In fact, for beginning, traditionally underserved or limited-resource producers, the catastrophic coverage is free and premiums for higher levels of protection are discounted by 50 percent. For spring planted crops in Kentucky, the deadline to apply is March 15. Interested farmers of all types are encouraged to to visit the Hardin/LaRue Farm Service Agency office to learn more about the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program. The office is on Lincoln Parkway at the intersection with Sportsman Lake Road. Remember that deadline is next week. Spring Seedings. There have been several questions the past couple of weeks on spring seeding times and rates. The best source of information on these two requests is the University of Kentucky Agronomy Publi­cation, AGR-18, “Grain and Forage Crop Guide,” which is free at the Hardin County Extension Service office and is available at www.hardinext.org. Recommendations on spring seedings for grasses (tall fescue, bluegrass, orchardgrass, and Timothy) is mid-February through the middle of April. Annual ryegrass seedings should begin later on March 15 with perennial ryegrass even later with seeding not recommended before mid-April. Both types of ryegrass seedings should be completed by mid-May. Seeding rate varies by grass species and also depends on whether or not the forage is being sown as a “straight-stand” or mixed with other forage crops. Typically, seeding rates are decreased about a third when mixed stands are established, but again that depends on the species being sown. Seeding rates range from 6 to 30 pounds per acre for grasses with Timothy having the lowest per acre rate and ryegrass the highest. Those producers sowing fescue are urged to consider using a non- or low-endophyte variety or one of newer novel-endophyte varieties to improve animal performance. UK also annually publishes variety trial test results on the most commonly grown forages in Kentucky. But legumes are what most producers are interested in sowing this time of year to improve hay and pasture quality. These include alfalfa, clovers, lespedezas and crown vetch. The general seeding date for these begins Feb. 1 through15 for all the clovers and annual lespedeza. For alfalfa and perennial lespedeza, that date is March 15 and for crown vetch, it’s April 1. Generally, all these legumes should be sown by mid-April except for crown vetch, which can be sown through the middle of May. Here, too, seeding rates per acre vary quite a bit by species and whether or not the legume is sown in a mixture. In most cases, legumes need to be inoculated so they produce nodules and are able to “fix” nitrogen. Seeding depth for all these forages is quite shallow: in most cases only a quarter of an inch and a half-inch at the most. All new seedings require a firm seedbed, except for clovers. They can be overspread on grass pasture and hay fields that have been grazed or mowed off close to the ground to lessen competition. Natural freezing and thawing, as well as snow and rain, can help incorporate clover seed into the ground for germination. Cattle also can be used to tramp clover seed into soft, damp soils. And, of course, mechanical seeders — those that seed by non-till and conventional methods — can be used. It’ll cost you approximately $30-plus per acre for seed and application costs to seed clover into a hay or pasture field plus any additional fertilizer or lime that may be needed. If you put some economic numbers to the benefits of clover, this is what you can expect in return: 2 to 3 tons additional yield of hay per acre, which can amount to $70 to $175 per acre; 25 to 50 pounds of additional weaning weight per calf, which is another $40 to $75; a 10 to 20 percent increase in conception rate, which translates into more calves born at $750 per weaned calf; and you can reduce your nitrogen fertilization cost per acre. So with all things considered, renovating pasture fields with clover makes good economic sense. Remember to always use certified seed of improved varieties that are recommended for Kentucky growing conditions. Again, UK’s annual Forage Variety Trial Results are the best place to obtain a complete list of recommended varieties. Source - thenewsenterprise.com

08.03.2016

USA - Outside industries retreat from the business of insurance

Cargill, Monsanto, Wells Fargo, and John Deere are officially out of the crop insurance business. Large companies such as these expanded into different aspects of the agriculture industry over the past few years, and their debut in the insurance industry made quite an impact. With their newly acquired insurance operations, they were the market players to watch — and now we’re watching them leave the industry. Behind this exodus is the matter of profit. Large companies, especially those that are publicly traded like Monsanto and John Deere, have a different perspective on risk and profit than the typical insurer. Let’s take crop insurance profit and loss over the past couple years, which is driven by fluctuations in crop prices. As Bloomberg explained, “Bumper harvests have sent corn, the biggest U.S. crop, to less than half its 2012 peak, ratcheting down the premiums farmers pay to insure against loss. Other crops have also seen steep price declines.” At the same time, the broader insurance industry has been seeing lackluster results. The most recent numbers from the Congressional Research Service indicate an underwriting loss of $1.3 billion in 2012 and profit of $657 million in 2013. For insurers, although these are not welcome results, the reality is that there will be challenging years — and insurers are accustomed to anticipating them. They are in for the long haul. But large, diversified commercial companies such as Cargill, John Deere and Monsanto have a much harder time adjusting to these financial results. Role of new entrants in insurance ecosystem So, were these big external players a collective blip on the map, or a real disruption? A pattern visible across many industries offers a possible answer. Large companies diversify around their current offerings, and if the results are disappointing, they realize the expanded offerings are not core to their business. Google has been extremely successful in most of their diversification, but Google+, its social network offering, never became the powerhouse they had hoped would be able to challenge Facebook. If these large companies are unsuccessful, they often leave the new industry. This is not to downplay the role that new entrants have in the insurance ecosystem. They push our thinking and ways of doing business in directions that might otherwise have taken years for the industry to adopt. New players are not attempting to be the same old insurer, only better. Their goal is to disrupt the business of insurance and to create something new in a niche that the industry had not perceived. The disruption they cause can take many forms, from new solutions to new distribution channels. They can go after these markets without owning the entire process — and in doing so, they create real changes in how the insurance industry has to operate. Autonomous vehicles will change the insurance landscape Looking ahead to another disrupter, driverless cars will present similar challenges. Volvo and Ford have both mentioned the possibility of covering product liability insurance. How will this impact the insurance industry? Will automakers really cover the liability or will they front it? Autonomous vehicles will change the insurance landscape by opening doors for these new thinkers. But will the insurance industry need to step in to present new insurance products that provide the necessary coverage? What role will insurers play in the new auto world? Disrupters like Monsanto, Cargill and John Deere were not in the market for a long time, but they do have an impact. They invested in changing the claims process, and they applied data, analytics and automation in areas that were previously very manual — which causes us to rethink other processes in place today. We can hope that their new ways of doing business opened some eyes in the industry. They did not change the game so much as establish that the game needs to be changed. Source - propertycasualty360.com

08.03.2016

Cotton harvest - video

While harvesting is one of the final steps in the production of cotton crops, it is one of the most important. The crop must be harvested before weather can damage or completely ruin its quality and reduce yield. In about 140 days after planting or 45 days after bolls appear, cotton bolls will begin to naturally split open along the bolls segments and dry out. When enough bolls have opened naturally, harvest aids are applied to the plant to help speed up the maturation process. This, also, is done either by ground or air application. Defoliation helps the leaves to dry and fall off and to help any of the remaining unopened cotton bolls to open. This practice enables growers to hasten the opening of the cotton bolls which can then be gathered quickly, in a short period of time. Most cotton in the United States, Europe and Australia is harvested mechanically, either by a cotton picker, a machine that removes the cotton from the boll without damaging the cotton plant, or by a cotton stripper, which strips the entire boll off the plant. Cotton strippers are used in regions where it is too windy to grow picker varieties of cotton, and usually after application of a chemical defoliant or the natural defoliation that occurs after a freeze. Cotton is a perennial crop in the tropics, and without defoliation or freezing, the plant will continue to grow. In developing countries cotton continues to be picked by hand.

08.03.2016

USA - Crop Insurance Rewards Bad Behavior, Punishes Conservation

Federal crop insurance encourages growers to plant crops on land that is vulnerable to soil erosion and discourages landowners from adopting good conservation practices. That’s the conclusion of a newly released study by Barry Barnett, a professor at Mississippi State University, and Ryan Stockwell, an agriculture manager at National Wildlife Federation. It was commissioned by the AGree Initiative, which works to catalyze “positive change in the food and agriculture system.” The biggest problem with the crop insurance program created under the federal farm bill is the structure of premium subsidies, which is set by Congress and the Risk Management Agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It sets higher premiums for high-risk regions and crops, which makes sense but also generates much larger taxpayer-paid premium subsidies. The generous subsidies, in turn, encourage cultivation of high-risk land prone to soil erosion. The solution is to lower the subsidies. EWG’s 2013 “Going, Going, Gone!” report found that “between 2008 and 2012, a total of 5.3 million acres of previously uncultivated, highly erodible land was planted with row crops.” Because many growers took advantage of the crop insurance program, among other reasons, millions of highly erodible acres were converted to cropland. Crop insurance also penalizes growers who adopt good conservation practices. As EWG’s 2015 “Boondoggle” report described, if a grower plants on environmentally sensitive land and cannot get a crop to grow, he can receive a “prevented planting” payout and remains eligible for the same level of crop insurance on that land the following year. But as the AGree report shows, if a grower adopts good conservation measures, is able to plant but then has a lower crop yield because of poor growing conditions, his insured “yield guarantee” is lowered the following year, putting him at greater risk of suffering a financial loss. In effect, prevented planting insurance penalizes growers who embrace conservation and rewards those who are poor stewards of the land. Many growers do the right thing. They adopt good conservation practices and don’t plant on high-risk land. But crop insurance provides windfall payments to those who do it wrong. Hopefully the next farm bill will get crop insurance reform right. Source - ewg.org

08.03.2016

USA - Tornadoes wreak havoc on some of state’s farms

One week after eight confirmed tornadoes touched down in Southwest, Central and eastern Virginia, more than 126 farmowner storm claims had been received by the Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. To date they total $1.6 million in damages, according to Rick Mattox, VFBMIC vice president of claims. “We expect that number to increase, perhaps to almost $2.5 million, as claims continue to come in,” Mattox said. Farm Bureau is one of the largest farm insurers in Virginia, so that’s one indication of how devastating the Feb. 24 storms were. The Virginia Department of Emergency Services recorded five fatalities: three in Waverly and one in Appomattox that involved tornado-damaged structures, and one drowning in Northern Virginia. In Patrick County, storms damaged farm equipment and buildings, according to Travis Bunn, a Virginia Cooperative Extension agent. “Roofing tin and debris are scattered around the county,” Bunn said. “We had about $175,000 in losses, not including timber. Some structures are still upright but leaning or missing a roof. Some hay rakes are damaged because the wind blew them over, and a hay baler was pushed down a hill and crashed into some woods.” In Essex County, “we were very fortunate—no grain tanks or sheds were destroyed,” said Extension agent Keith Balderson. “But we have a lot of debris in the fields. Probably about 150 to 160 acres of cropland will have to be cleaned by hand, picking up trash and metal. If we don’t clean them before harvesting winter wheat, we risk damaging a half-million-dollar combine.” The Virginia Department of Forestry also identified timber losses of about $750,000 in Essex County, according to department spokesman John Campbell. The primary farm damage in Westmoreland County “was a destroyed center-pivot irrigation system; it was all twisted up,” said Stephanie Romelczyk, an Extension agent in that county. “That’s probably about a $60,000 loss. And then there were some roofs blown off and lots of trees down.” In Middlesex County high winds caused about $500,000 in equipment damage on two farms, said Extension agent David Moore. “A center pivot was probably a total loss, along with a grain elevator, two storage bins, a shed and a shop area on one farm. Another farm lost an old dairy parlor, and a concrete silo was demolished.” In addition to major property losses, there are downed trees and damaged fences that will need to be cleaned up. And wet weather this winter has begun to delay fieldwork for many crop producers, according to a monthly report from the Virginia field office of the National Agricultural Statistics Service. Source - augustafreepress.com

07.03.2016

Cotton: how it is grown, cultivated and harvested

HISTORY Cotton is a plant, it grows wild in many places on the earth, but it has been known about, cultivated and put to use by people of many lands for centuries. Scientists and historians have found shreds of cloth or written reference to cotton dating back at least seven-thousand years.  The oldest discovery was made in a Mexican cave, where scientists unearthed bits and pieces of cotton bolls and cloth.  Archaeologists have also found cloth fragments in the Indus Valley of India (Pakistan) dating about 3000 B.C.  In 1500 B.C., cotton was referred to in a Hindu Rig-Veda hymn mentioning “threads in the loom.”  It is generally believed that the first cultivation of cotton was in India, though it grew wild in several locations around the world.  People living in Egypt’s Nile Valley and across the world in Peru were also familiar with cotton. Cotton was grown by American Indians in the early 1500’s, documented from sightings by the Coronado expedition 1540-42.  The Spaniards raised a cotton crop in Florida in 1556. In England, in the early 1700's, during the height of the British Empire, it was against the law, to either import or manufacture cloth from cotton.  These laws were enacted to protect the powerful English sheep and wool industry of that time.  These restrictions also kept the cotton industry from expanding to the American Colonies.  However, by the early 1600's, cotton had been introduced to North America and in 1607 the first seed was planted by colonists along the James River in Virginia.   The colonists had the ability to produce much cotton but were restricted by the mechanical know-how.  It was Samuel Slater, an English mill worker, who changed this by migrating to America in 1790 and building the first American cotton mill from memory.  With the development of the cotton mill, Eli Whitney saw the need for a faster means of removing the lint (cotton fibers) from the seed.  In 1793, he invented a machine known as the cotton gin.  This invention revolutionized the way lint was separated from the seed.  Up to that time, for centuries, the separation process had all been done by hand.  With Whitney's gin, short for the word engine, lint volume was increased for each worker from 1 lb. To 50 lbs. per day. Harvesting the cotton by hand was another limitation of productivity.  An experienced laborer could pick approximately 450 pounds of seed cotton (cotton removed from the plant with seeds intact) by hand per day.  A picking device was first patented in 1850 and a stripper (a machine that strips both open and unopened bolls and trash from the plant) in 1871.  In the early 1930’s, after years of development and change, the Rust Brothers of Mississippi used a one row mechanical cotton picker (a machine that used revolving spindles or barbed points to grab and pull the cotton from the open boll) of their design to pick approximately 8,000 pounds of seed cotton in one day.  This was quite an improvement in cotton harvest efficiency.  THE PLANT There are several species of “wild cotton” (cotton that grows uncultivated ) in the world.  They have been found in Australia, Africa, Arizona, Central America, Lower California, Brazil, Mexico and other tropical countries and islands.  Because of problems related to their refinement, they are not economically feasible to use.  Through genetic assistance and breeding, today’s cottons have evolved from these “wild” sources and are more processing friendly. Currently, there are five prominent types of cotton being grown commercially around the world.  They are Egyptian, Sea Island, American Pima, Asiatic and Upland.  Because of their need for a long, sunny growing period with at least 160 frost free days they are grown between latitudes 45 degrees north and 30 degrees south.  The major producing countries within this region are the United States, Peoples Republic of China, India, Pakistan and Republic of Uzbekistan.  Also, Brazil, Australia, Egypt, Argentina, Turkey, Greece, Syria and others produce significant, but lesser amount  In the U.S. there are fourteen major cotton growing states that produce Upland cotton.  They are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.  Some cotton is also grown in Florida, Kansas and New Mexico.  American Pima cotton is grown in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas.  All of these states form a region in the United States known as the Cotton Belt and have three things in common, lots of sunshine, water and fertile soil, very important to growing a good cotton crop. Upland cotton being the most common type in the U.S. has a staple length (length of fiber) of 13/16 to 1 ¼ inches.  The American Pima has a staple length of 1 5/16 to 1 ½ inches.  These plant types grow and mature at different rates and lengths of time, but basically mature within a 30 day period of each other. Cotton plants have a general time frame in which they grow and produce after planting (introducing the seed to moist soil).  With ideal conditions, the planted cotton seed will germinate (to begin to grow) or sprout and emerge in about five to ten days.  The first 2 leaves that are visible on the young cotton plant are seedling leaves called cotyledons (cot-a-lee-dons).  They are useful for absorbing sunlight into the plant.  The sunlight is then converted through a process known as photosynthesis, into nourishing carbohydrates that will help the plant grow. In about two to four weeks they turn over the photosynthetic task to true leaves (leaves produced subsequent to the cotyledons) which continue the feeding process for the duration of the plants life.  The plant continues to grow, adding leaves and height, and in approximately five to seven weeks, small flower buds called squares (a small flower bud covered with fringed leaf-like parts called bracts) will appear on the cotton plant.  As this square develops, the bud swells and begins to push through the bracts until it opens into an attractive flower.  Within three days, the flower will pollinate(the transfer of pollen from the anther to the stigma of the same or another flower) itself, change from a creamy white or yellow color to a pinkish red, and then wither and fall, exposing a small, green, immature cotton boll (a segmented pod containing 32 immature seeds from which the cotton fibers will grow).  This boll is considered a fruit because it contains seeds.  As the fibers continue to grow and thicken within the segmented boll, it enlarges until it becomes approximately the size of a small fig.  Now, the cotton fibers have become mature and thickened with their primary growth substance, cellulose (a carbohydrate, the chief component of the cell wall in most plants).  An average boll will contain nearly 500,000 fibers of cotton and each plant may bear up to 100 bolls In about 140 days after planting or 45 days after bolls appear, the cotton boll will begin to naturally split open along the bolls segments or carpels and dry out, exposing the underlying cotton segments called locks.  These dried carpels are known as the bur, and it's the bur that will hold the locks of cotton in place when fully dried and fluffed, ready for picking. The growth cycle of the various cotton species vary in length, but the sequence of fruit production remain the same.  Weather, insects and moisture can adversely affect optimum conditions for plant growth and it is the farmer's responsibility to adjust to these conditions to optimize yield.  PRODUCTION Before cotton can be processed into the many products it becomes.  It must be planted, irrigated, nurtured with fertilizer, protected from unwanted weeds, grasses and insects and harvested.  This usually means loosening the soil to the depth of 1 to 2 ½  feet with tillage equipment.  This will allow water and cotton roots to penetrate the soil and support the plant. A seedbed (the row in which the cotton seed will be planted) is prepared by listing (forming land into ridges and furrow) the soil. This allows for faster warming of the soil in the spring and directs irrigation water across the field.  Small amounts of soil enriching nutrients, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, may be added to the soil at this time.   Planting may be done by hand, but in the more advanced regions of the world, mechanical plantersare used.  When the soil reaches optimum temperature, about 65 degrees, these implements will place the seeds in the soil, usually 1 to 2 inches deep, depending on soil type.  The mechanical planters can cover as many as 12 rows at a time. In some cotton production regions, where soil erosion is a problem, conservation tillage is used.  In this system, crop residue from the previous crop or a cover crop is left on the soil surface to protect the soil from heavy rains and winds.  A special planter is used to open the soil and place the seed without disturbing the protective cover.  As the plants demand it, when available, additional water is delivered to the fields.  Sometimes only from natural rainfall, called rain-feed farming, or through irrigation (water application through artificial means), called irrigated farming.  This can be accomplished in 3 different ways; 1) furrow irrigation takes place by simply running water down a seedbed furrow, 2) sprinkler irrigation is much like lawn sprinklers where pressurized water is sprayed out over an area, and 3) drip tape irrigation, this is a relatively new method of irrigation using buried tubing that releases water into the soil beneath the plant. Most of today's commercial cotton farms use a combination of weed control methods.  Such as, Cultivation which is done mechanically by machines called cultivators, hand rogueingor weed removal by people with the use of weed hoes and the application of chemical herbicides (chemicals used to control weeds).  Chemical herbicides can be applied before or after the cotton is planted.  Once the cotton plant has emerged, cultivation and hand rogueing must be done very carefully in order to kill the weeds but not harm the growing cotton plant.  If the weeds were allowed to grow, they would compete for nutrients in the soil that are necessary for a healthy and productive cotton plant. When the cotton plant is in it's seedling stage, it is very susceptible to soil borne fungal disease.  There are several diseases that can stunt the growth of the plant, cause leaves to fall off, attack the roots and make the plant wither and die.  If the effects of disease don't kill the plant, low yields and a poor quality cotton will result.  Development of disease resistant cotton seed has become a priority in the industry.  Cotton varieties resistant to some fungi and other destructive organisms have been developed and are being used in certain areas.  There is still more research to be done before fungal disease is no longer a factor in producing cotton.   The plant's food, or nutrients, are referred to in agriculture as fertilizer.  Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur, calcium and magnesium are the primary fertilizer elements (macronutrients) but there are several trace elements (micronutrients required in small quantities for optimum plant growth) also.  These include copper, manganese, zinc, molybdenum, boron, chlorine and cobalt.  Starter fertilizer is usually added to the soil before the seed is planted to provide nutrients to feed a healthy seedling.  As the cotton plant grows, its nutrient requirement is monitored and any additions needed are applied. Insect pests have plagued the cotton growing industry over the years and they are a source of constant concern to growers.  Insects such as aphid, mite, bollworms, boll weevil, lygus, thrip, White flye, and pink bollworms cause serious destruction to the cotton plants' squares, bolls, leaves, and fiber resulting in a monetary loss to the cotton grower.  The pink bollworm is responsible for the most cotton damage and has been found in all of the cotton producing countries, including the United States.  The spread of this pest is being held in check by plowing cotton stalks under more than 6 inches deep immediately after harvest to remove over-wintering habitat.  There are also beneficial insects or predator insects that feed on various insect pests.  Most growers use the services of a crop consultant to monitor their fields for insect pest populations and advise them on treatment.  If the insect pest population increases to a level that may severely affect the field's production potential, the grower may then be advised to use an insecticide (a chemical product used to suppress or eliminate an insect pest).  These products may be applied by a ground application vehicle specially designed to avoid damaging the cotton plants.  Airplanes and/or helicopters are used for air applications, flown low over the field by trained pilots to deliver their load.  A method of insect pest control being practiced on a limited basis is called integrated pest management (I.P.M.).  This method coordinates the use of insecticides and the dispersal of beneficial insects purchased to aid in suppressing unwanted insects.  Research is being done to find insects to control a wider spectrum of insect pests, a limiting factor of effectiveness in today's I.P.M. practices. Pest management in cotton production today contributes a substantial share of the costs involved in raising a crop.  The cotton farmer is reluctant to treat weed and insect pests unless absolutely necessary to protect crop yield potential.  The correct decisions and timing of both irrigations and pest control measures is an ally to a grower's success as he/she guides their crop to maturity. When enough bolls have opened naturally, harvest aids are applied to the plant to help speed up the maturation process.  This, also, is done either by ground or air application.  Defoliation helps the leaves to dry and fall off and to help any of the remaining unopened cotton bolls to open.  This practice enables the grower to hasten the opening of the cotton bolls which can then be gathered quickly, in a short period of time.  It is essential that the crop is harvested before weather and rain can damage or ruin its quality and reduce yield.  Frost also causes the plant to shed its leaves naturally and assists in splitting bolls, but may occur too late in the season to benefit harvest.  Now the cotton crop is ready to be harvested. For centuries cotton has been picked by hand.  Hand picking is done in the less progressive cotton growing regions of the world.  It is very inefficient and no longer practiced in modernized countries.  As the mechanical cotton picker moves through the field, the cotton plants are guided through the picker head (a unit that contains the picking components).  The seed cotton, or locks, in the bur encounter revolving barbed spindles attached to a picking bar (a vertical bar that contains 18 to 20 spindles) attached to a rotating drum.  The locks are grabbed by the barbed spindle and pulled from its bur.  The rotating drum then moves the picking bar toward the doffer.  A doffer is a series of curricular, rubber lined pads, stacked 18 to 20 high, that remove cotton from the spindle.  The seed cotton and spindles pass through the doffer where the cotton is removed or doffed from the spindle to fall to the picker door (a side component of the picker with channeling to facilitate the movement of cotton).  An air vacuum created by a fan then sucks the cotton away from the door and blows it into the basket.  The spindle now continues on its rotation passing through the moistener pads (small finned pads stacked 18 to 20 high, which add water and/or moistening agent to the spindles) where they are lubricated to assist in cleaning them.  This sequence repeats itself continually while the cotton is being picked.  Spindle type cotton pickers harvest most of the cotton grown in the United States. In some areas of the Cotton Belt, brush strippers are used to harvest seed cotton.  These machines remove bolls and burs from the plant with rotating brushes and bats.  Material is fed into a field cleaner where much of the burs and sticks are removed and blown into a large basket.  They are used primarily in dryland farming cotton areas in Texas where the cotton plant varieties are more compact in stature.  Small plant size is important when using a stripper because they tend to accumulate more trash (leaves, bolls, stems and branches) in their harvested product. Today’s modern cotton harvesters can cover up to 6 to 8 rows at a time and can harvest up to 190,000 pounds of seed cotton a day.  These new cotton harvesters are a major improvement over the hand methods of the past. Prior to the development of the module builder, most cotton picked by machines was dumped into cotton trailers and hauled to a cotton gin (a place where seed and fiber are mechanically separated).  This system became inefficient when the trailers were filled faster than the gin could process the cotton and the cotton pickers had to cease harvesting while waiting for trailers to empty.  This challenge was met with the invention of the module builder in 1972.  This implement allows cotton to be dumped from the picker onto the ground and be compressed hydraulically to form a module (tightly pressed stack) of cotton.  Each module holds 12-14 bales.  This module can be left in the field for storage and later be hauled directly to the gin or transported by a module mover to the gin’s storage yard.  The use of these builders allow the pickers to continue harvesting, unimpeded by ginning problems or delays.  Source - cottonsjourney.com

07.03.2016

India - Grapes and mangoes marginally affected by hailstorms

The unseasonal rains and hailstorms in certain parts of Marathwada, Vidarbha and northern Maharashtra during the past week did not result in extensive damage to crops, as farmers had already moved into newer modes of cultivation. Last year, heavy rains and inclement weather destroyed 76,000 hectares of crop mainly grapes and onion across these regions. “This year, many farmers moved away from older cultivation methods of using canopies for grapes, while many others switched to trellising style that does not let rain water accumulate on the vines,” said Jagdish Holkar, former Chairman of Indian Grape Processing Board, adding that damage to grapes and grapevines were much less this year. Crops of onion, grapes and mangoes were only marginally affected. The impact on mango farmers is minimal as the majority of them have either plucked the fruits or are in the process of plucking them. Source - freshplaza.com

07.03.2016

USA - Oregon researcher participates in potato pest study

Dee Denver, a genomicist in Oregon State University's College of Science is part of an international team studying potato cyst nematodes. Denver is working with scientists from Idaho, New York, Canada, France and Scotland on a five-year, $3.2 million project funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The team includes Inga Zasada, a nematode expert with the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service and a courtesy OSU faculty member. A key objective of the study, said Denver, is to find less environmentally damaging strategies for controlling the pests. Currently the most effective control measure is fumigation with methyl bromide, a highly toxic, ozone-layer-depleting gas that’s increasingly being restricted because of environmental concerns. The study focuses on two highly destructive nematode pests: the pale cyst nematode, Globodera pallida, and golden nematode, G. rostochiensis. Because infested potato fields must be quarantined, the pests greatly threaten U.S. export markets. The U.S. crop brings farmers about $4 billion a year. Sales of potato chips, frozen potatoes and other processed potato products boost the commodity’s economic worth to more than $4 trillion, according to the researchers. Oregon farmers earned about $180 million from potatoes in 2015, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The golden nematode appeared in New York in the 1940s and so far is confined there. Some resistant potato varieties adapted to Northeastern conditions have been developed by scientists from Cornell University and state and federal agencies. The pale cyst nematode first appeared in Idaho in 2006, possibly from contaminated seed potatoes. So far it has infested less than 1 percent of Idaho’s potato fields, but it has caused $4.4 million in direct losses, according to a 2012 economic assessment. There are no resistant russet-type potato varieties. Source - freshplaza.com

07.03.2016

Kenya - Farmers advised to insure their cows

Dairy farmers in the North Rift region have been advised to seek insurance services for their cattle. This is to prevent huge losses in case of diseases outbreak or any other calamity that can lead to death of cattle. Agriculture Principal Secretary Richard Lesiyampe said many dairy farmers in North Rift have failed to insure their dairy cattle and have ended up counting huge losses after sudden death of the cows. He said the cows are usually bought expensively besides extra costs of feeding, thus the need to be insured against any natural occurrences such as sudden death or sickness. "I advise dairy farmers in the North Rift region, especially those with dairy cows to take the right steps by insuring their cows. As we all know, dairy cows cost too much money which should not be left unguarded. Despite huge risks in dairy farming, farmers should not sit and wait to count losses yet they have an opportunity to prevent this," the PS advised dairy farmers at Eldoret ASK Show on Saturday. He noted that several insurance companies have introduced several agricultural products aimed at helping farmers insure their ventures including crops against any occurrences depending on what the two parties have agreed upon. "Technology has led to introduction of insurance companies that let you insure animals and crops as a farmer with little money each month. Do not let your animals die for you to start regretting that you would have taken precaution earlier. This is the right time for you to visit an insurance company and insure your cows," he said. Source - hivisasa.com

07.03.2016

Canada - High crop insurance is announced

Saskatchewan producers will have access to the highest coverage in program history as well as expanded options for growing fababeans, Khorasan wheat and forage. “Crop Insurance provides affordable insurance protection for farmers looking to reduce the financial impact of crop losses,” said Lawrence MacAulay, Federal Agriculture and Agri-Food Minister. “The Government of Canada is committed to working with provincial governments to deliver effective Business Risk Management programs that will help farmers in managing risk due to severe market volatility and disaster situations.” “The Crop Insurance Program continues to be a major part of Saskatchewan farmers’ risk protection and is one of the key reasons why agriculture continues to be a driver of the provincial economy,” Lyle Stewart, Saskatchewan Agriculture Minister. “Since 2008, when this government completed a review of the Crop Insurance Program, continual improvements have been made to ensure it remains relevant and effective for producers.” The Crop Insurance budget for 2016 is $166 million. On average, coverage levels are increasing to a record $216 per acre, up from $183 per acre in 2015. The improved coverage is a result of better forecasted crop prices and increased long-term yields. Due to an increase in coverage, the premium per acre is going up slightly to an average of $7.84 per acre from $7.06 in 2015. More enhancements have been introduced for 2016. The insurable area for fababeans has expanded to include the entire province and insurable yields have increased reflecting, the increased production of this crop. Insurance for Khorasan wheat has improved as producers can receive individual coverage for their farm. Previously, coverage for this crop was based on area averages. An Establishment Benefit value of $30 per acre has been added for camelina, in response to the experience growers have gained with this new oilseed crop. In response to industry feedback, the cap on the forage insurance variable and in-season price option has been removed. This will allow for an increase in the market price of forage to be reflected in the claim payments of producers who select those options. This year, producers will have higher forage coverage as insured prices have risen more than 30 per cent and forage establishment coverage has increased from $55 to $70 per acre. Forage insurance proved effective in 2015 as substantial payments were made following a spring frost and dry conditions. Establishment Benefit values are rising for a number of crops in 2016 including soybeans, lentils, barley and Khorasan. The Establishment Benefit feature provided significant support to producers last spring when newly-emerged canola was damaged by frost. More than 2,500 claims were quickly and effectively paid, providing more than $47 million to producers. Producers are encouraged to contact their local Crop Insurance office and review their coverage. The range of program features and choices is extensive and the Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation wants to ensure producers have the best insurance for their farm. Changes, renewals or new applications for a Crop Insurance contract need to be made by March 31. Producers who prefer to do their business online are encouraged to use CropConnect where reviewing coverage, options and making selections can be conducted from their computer or mobile device. Source - weyburnthisweek.com

07.03.2016

India - Farmers worried as rain, hailstorm damage crops

Current spell of rain and hailstorm in parts of Rajasthan raised the fears of kharif crop loss among farmers. Crops of mustard, cumin and isabgol (psyllium husk) in Jaislamer, Jodhpur, Sikar and Jhunjhunu, have witnessed significant damages. With sudden change in weather, crops in Pokhran sub-division of Jaisalmer faced massive damages. Adding to the woes of farmers, the turnaround in weather came when the crops were ripe and ready for harvest. To assess the situation, MP Gajendra Singh Shekhawat along with MLA Chotu Singh Bhati and district collector visited the affected places. "We took a stock of the losses and have assured farmers of all the needed help. Officers have been asked to carry out relief activities at the earliest and the issue would be raised at all the appropriate levels to facilitate the farmers for compensation," said Shekhawat. The state government too is monitoring the situation closely though it rejected the claims of massive losses. "Though no major calamity is reported so far and hailstorms are in patches, we are still keeping tab and will assess the actual losses soon," said Prabhulal Saini, agriculture minister. In Jodhpur and other parts of western Rajasthan, hailstorm and thunder showers also affected the Rabi crop. Places including Mathania and Phalodi were the worst affected. "If it continues, it is again going to be problematic," said Chotu Ram, a farmer at the Mathania village. Farmers in all parts of the state requested public representatives to help them. Source - timesofindia.indiatimes.com

04.03.2016

Australia - New climate changes our rainfall zones

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="450"] Australia's new rainfall zones based on research by Australian Export Grains Innovation Centre agro-meterologist David Stephens.[/caption] WA growers will have to become the most efficient in the world to manage a new climate emerging across the country. Data analysed by the Australian Grains Export Innovation Centre (AEGIC) reveals traditional rainfall zones have changed significantly since 2000 and growers should plan their seasons based on the past 15 years. AEGIC agro-meteorologist David Stephens revealed his findings at the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) Grains Research Update in Perth this week. From analysing more than 8000 Bureau of Meteorology stations around the country he has seen a shift in WA's rainfall from winter to summer, with 50 millimetres of winter rain lost and 25mm of summer rain gained on average. "The increasing summer rain means they've got to utilise that out of season rainfall more and more," Dr Stephens said. "The spraying of summer weeds and early sowing really becomes important. "Also, all the work on trying to improve water storage on properties and nutrient efficiency with soil amelioration combined with all the zero till and new technology means that growers are really going to have to be focused on water use efficiency." Dr Stephens said the traditional mid-year rain in June and July had decreased and this was particularly evident in 2015. "We used to have truncated rain fall in June and July and that's where the rainfall has really dropped off," he said. "That's the classic time when the Indian Ocean trough formed out to the west of us and that's what weakened dramatically in the mid 1970s and then in more recent decade as well. "Last year we had some of the weakest upper level low pressures over the Wheatbelt and out to the west of WA ever recorded. "It was lining up with a very balmy, sunny winter where we had hardly any cold fronts of significance." Dr Stephens said a cut off low over the Indian Ocean "saved our bacon" last year but it was becoming more normal for this to occur instead of the classic cold front bands which have always been the regular winter water suppliers. He said while growers traditionally had their seasons mapped on past experience, they should be mindful of considering only the past 15 years based on his findings. In this time there had been a general increase in summer rainfall across the entire county, a decrease in winter rainfall and an obvious change to growing seasons. Dr Stephens said the Merredin CBH grain bin opening date had moved forward six weeks since 1970 while the net growing season for that area had shortened by 11 days. His analysis also revealed a uniform rainfall zone along the eastern edge of the Wheatbelt from Beacon to Southern Cross to Grass Patch. It identified a weakening of the Indian Ocean Trough to the west of Perth since the mid-1970's which was directly related to the decline in winter rainfall. Dr Stephens said the analysis highlighted that the shift to earlier sowing of winter crops measured recently by AEGIC should continue because early sown crops take advantage of any additional summer soil moisture. "They also experience a lower evaporative demand through the growing season, and are less affected by declining rain in October and rising spring temperatures," he said. In pastoral regions in much of WA, increasing summer rain with a reduction in rainfall variability has assisted perennial C4 (tropical) plants at the expense of C3 (temperate) grasses, especially in the southern areas. "Australia is going to need some of the most water-efficient farming systems in the world to mitigate the effects of a drier and warmer climate in southern Australia,'' Dr Stephens said. "Research in this area is vital because Australian crop yields have been among the most affected by climate change compared to other grain exporting nations." Source - farmweekly.com.au

04.03.2016

Swaziland - National emergency declared as Swaziland drought intensifies

The drought in Swaziland began in 2014 as a result of the El Nino weather condition; its recent worsening has led the government of Swaziland to declare a national emergency. The Prime Minister, Dr B Sibusio Dlamini, said “The negative impact of the drought has led to seriously diminished water availability for crop production, human consumption and livestock sustenance. At the present time, we count the loss of around 40,000 head of cattle, and have to report a serious food and water vulnerability currently experienced by approximately 300,000 of our people, which is around 25 per cent of the population.” “The UN food agency is already feeding more than 200,000 Swazis as part of its large emergency operation in Southern Africa,” the Anglican mission agency United Society said. The managing director of Luyengo Fresh Produce, Mr Tiekie de Beer, told United Society: “The planting season in Swaziland for commercial and subsistence farmers is in November and December. Hardly anything was planted last year due to the severe drought conditions.'' Tiekie expects that only about 10 per cent of the normal requirement will be harvested. Source - freshplaza.com

04.03.2016

India - PM crop insurance in UP from July

Uttar Pradesh will implement the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana this year, the Uttar Pradesh govrnment announced on Thursday. In a meeting chaired to prepare UP to roll out PM Narendra Modi's crop insurance scheme, agriculture production commissioner Pravir Kumar said farmers must sign up for insurance for the Kharif season-July to October by July 31-and for the Rabi season, by December 31, this year. Insurance of all crop loans will be mandatory, while beneficiaries can also insure non-crop loans on a voluntary basis. In addition to natural calamities, losses due to pests or other diseases, hailstorms, rains, and earthquakes, crops loans will also be insured against damage caused up to 14 days after the crops are harvested. Kumar said farmers will have to pay as premium, up to 2% on the sum insured for Kharif loans, and up to 1.5% for Rabi loans, while the remainder premium amount will be shared equally between the Centre and state governments. Source - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com

883
of 1225