NEWS
759
of 1173
News
25.01.2017

India - Drought-affected farmers seek compensation from Central team

Drought-affected farmers in the delta districts today sought Rs 25,000 to 30,000 per acre as compensation from the Central team that is currently on a state-wide tour to study the damage caused by the drought. In Thanjavur district, the ryots also demanded an insurance amount in full for the affected crops and relief for the kin of farmers who had committed suicide due to crop loss. The farmers of Tiruvarur district told the team that 2,015 acres of land had been affected, while in Tiruchirapalli the team visited Manachanallur, Lalgudi and Manaparai areas. Peasants in Nagapattinam district showed dry paddy fields to the team and submitted a memorandum in which they said that they had incurred 100 per cent crop failure as all the Samba transplanted paddy that were dependent on Cauvery water had already fully withered. Stressing the need for adequate relief for crop damage from the National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF), farmers said they should get a minimum of Rs 30,000 per acre as compensation. Meanwhile, reports from Erode said, a two-member Central drought assessment team visited some villages in the district and said a detailed report on the drought situation would be submitted within a week’s time to the Centre. In Tuticorin, the panel member SP Chaudhary told reporters that there was no second opinion about the impact of drought in Tamil Nadu. A 10-member team deputed by the Centre is touring the state to assess the crop loss due to drought, and is likely to return to the capital city on January 25, before leaving for Delhi. Source - http://www.india.com

25.01.2017

Sri Lanka - Index-based climate insurance seen feasible for farmers

Index-based climate insurance is a feasible option for Sri Lankan farmers if they had greater education and awareness that could overcome existing lack of trust, a new study has found. Kanchana Wickramasinghe, a research economist at the Institute of Policy Studies, said farmers faced big climate change risks given the increased frequency and intensity of natural disasters. “Farmers have limited options but they face significant risks,” she told a forum where she presented the findings of her study for IPS. “Climate change brings additional risks to their livelihoods.” The dry zone is one of the most vulnerable areas for climate change impact and the focus of the IPS study was on paddy farmers. Only four percent of farmers surveyed for the study had voluntary insurance, Wickramasinghe said. Most farmers who had insurance did so as it came with agricultural loans from banks, and not because they take insurance as a risk management strategy, she said. This was because of lack of trust, and lack of education and awareness on the potential for climate insurance to reduce risks. Index-based insurance relies on ‘objective parameters’ like rainfall which is closely correlated with crop yield and has a higher level of trust than that of indemnity insurance which is based on direct measurement of damage suffered by farmers. The study found farmers felt index-based insurance had low costs and timely payouts. Farmers reported bad experiences fellow farmers had with indemnity insurance and lack of trust as they were not sure of getting benefits when disaster strikes. They also feel insurance was not suitable for small scale farmers and was better for large scale agri-business. Wickramasinghe said the study showed insurance can help with sudden loss of income experienced by farmers due to climate related events like drought or floods when their loan repayments become a problem. The study found borrowing was the most common risk management strategy of farmers. Borrowing was mainly from informal sources, with pawn insurance the most common, and also from village level money lenders and relatives and very little from formal banks. Policymakers need to pay attention to rainfall index insurance to avoid issues with indemnity based insurance, “Farmer education is a must because most don’t understand insurance,” Wickramasinghe said. Source - http://economynext.com

24.01.2017

USA - Do Farm Subsidies Reduce Rural Poverty?

Rural voters played an important role in the last election. As the Senate considers a new Secretary of Agriculture and Congress begins work on a new Farm Bill, it’s important to consider the effect that food and farm policy has on rural communities, especially those that are impoverished. Farm lobbyists frequently insist that farm subsidies are critically important to supporting the rural economy. “It's not so much a safety net for farmers as it keeps rural America alive,” said one proponent of corn subsidies. “Agriculture forms the lifeblood of many rural communities,” according to an advocate for cotton farmers. So, according to the logic of these farm lobbyists, farm subsidies are “crucial to the economic security of rural America.” Even modest cuts to subsidies for “Cadillac” crop insurance policies would “[hit] rural America where it hurts most,” according to Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts. The truth is that farm subsidies play little role in reducing rural poverty. That’s according to a paper by three leading agriculture economists commissioned by the American Enterprise Institute, or AEI. It confirms the findings of a 2013 paper by other leading economists. Here’s why. Farm subsidies overwhelmingly flow to the largest producers of bulk commodities, so “these benefits are mainly distributed to large commercial-sized farms,” wrote the authors the of AEI-sponsored paper. According to EWG’s Farm Subsidy Database, 77 percent of farm subsidies paid between 1995 and 2014 flowed to the largest 10 percent of subsidy recipients. The top 1 percent of subsidy recipients received 26 percent of all payments. As a result, roughly 30,000 very large farm businesses have received more than $46 billion in subsidy payments – or $1.57 million per farm – over the last two decades. While some very large operations receive more than $1 million annually in subsidies, the bottom 80 percent of subsidy recipients annually collect less than $10,000. “While farm subsidies transfer income from taxpayers to farm owners, most of the direct beneficiaries are relatively wealthy,” the economists concluded. The median wealth of the nation’s 50,000 largest commercial farms is $6.9 million, according to the USDA’s Economic Research Service. What’s more, many subsidies also flow to urban residents, not farmers – including the Trump administration’s nominee for Secretary of Agriculture, former Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue. According to EWG’s Farm Subsidy Database, between 1995 and 2004 Purdue collected $278,000 in farm subsidies, even though he is not a farmer. Purdue owns farms – which he leases to farmers – and ran businesses that sell fertilizer and store grain. But EWG could find no evidence that Purdue has been a farmer since he left his family’s farm for college more than 50 years ago. Thousands of city slickers like Purdue continue to collect farm subsidies. But these are not the only reasons why subsidies do not reduce rural poverty. Farming accounts for only 6 percent of employment in non-metropolitan counties – employing far fewer people than transportation, utilities, manufacturing and services. “Farm income and employment are small shares of the rural economy almost everywhere in the United States,” according to the AEI experts. “Even with multiplier impacts that affect nonfarm employment and income opportunities, farm subsidies do little for rural poverty.” Farm workers, rural residents, and others in farm-related occupations receive little additional income from farm programs, the experts wrote. Despite warnings of a “farm crisis,” farm household income is still growing – even as the price of some bulk commodities return to normal. The USDA projects that median farm household income is $20,000 higher than that of non-farm households. Large and very large commercial farms reported median household incomes of $340,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, in 2015. Most farm households do not face the risk of poverty, according to the new AEI paper: “If the goal is to reduce poverty in the United States, focusing on farm operator households is unlikely to have much impact.” Many of the counties that receive the most subsidies are also among the counties with the nation’s highest levels of poverty and diet-related disease. Moreover, farm workers, who earn about $9 an hour, tend to pick fruit and vegetable crops that do not benefit from the lion’s share of farm subsidies. So do farm subsidies reduce rural poverty? According to the experts, the USDA does “many things to promote rural development,” such as offer loans to upgrade wastewater utilities, “but the agriculture subsidy programs are not central to that effort.” The reason why is clear: Most subsidies flow to the largest and most successful farm businesses, and have little impact on the rest of the rural economy. Source - http://www.ewg.org

24.01.2017

Philippines - Rains damage P.5-M crops in Cebu

The low pressure area (LPA) that brought continuous rains in Cebu over the past two weeks has caused more than P500,000 in damage to crops in the three local government units. Assistant provincial agriculturist Roldan Saragena said only the towns of Pinamungahan and Balamban and the city of Toledo have so far submitted their reports on initial crop damage. According to Saragena, the three LGUs reported a total of P530,000 worth of damage to their irrigated rice farms, affecting 210 farmers. The city government of Toledo also reported another P39,375 worth of damage to vegetable farms, which affected 11 farmers. Saragena said that their office is checking whether the affected farmers were enrolled in the agri-fishery insurance program of the Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation (PCIC) so they can claim payment for crop damages from the PCIC. Saragena urged the affected farmers to coordinate with their local agriculture office to avail of assistance such as fertilizers and seedlings. He also urged other LGUs to submit their respective crop damage report within the week so that it could be validated, consolidated and coordinated with the Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office. Saragena said they will be conducting a province-wide meeting with local agriculturist offices on February 15 to discuss, among others, the submission of crop damage reports. Source -  http://cebudailynews.inquirer.net

24.01.2017

USA - USDA to visit more than 600 Ky. farms for Agricultural Resource Management Survey

Representatives of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) this week will visit more than 600 Kentucky to collect data for the final phase of the 2016 Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS). ARMS is a joint effort between NASS and USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS). The survey is an annual program that gathers in-depth information on production practices, costs, and financial well-being of American farm families. ARMS targets select commodities on a rotational basis. This year, the survey places additional focus on corn and the conventional and organic dairy sectors. The last time ARMS focused on the dairy sector was in 2010 and focused only on the conventional dairy sector. This will be the first time ARMS will include additional focus on the organic dairy production. “As producers begin to consider the 2018 Farm Bill, this information will be critical to educate policy makers,” said David Knopf, director of the NASS Eastern Mountain Regional Office in Kentucky. “Farm operators have a great opportunity to provide a picture of the farm economy and the issues that impact farming. Equally important is understanding the health of farm households and how that may impact rural communities.” By surveying corn growers, the 2016 ARMS will provide a comprehensive analysis of the U.S. corn sector. Data from the 2016 ARMS will be used to assess crop insurance choices made by corn growers, which in turn will help policymakers better understand the impact of crop insurance offerings on farm production decisions and financial outcomes. The results of the 2016 ARMS will also help USDA and other policymakers analyze the impacts of the new Dairy Margin Protection Program, introduced in the Agricultural Act of 2014. With operational costs driving structural changes within the dairy industry, this new program aims to help dairy producers when milk prices drop and feed prices remain high. USDA launched the program in 2015, making the current survey crucial to measuring its initial effects. All farmers selected to participate in the 2016 ARMS were notified last month. Trained enumerators will begin making appointments this week and visit the participating farms to gather the information through personal interviews. Visits will continue through early April. Once all the data are in, NASS and ERS will review and analyze the information. NASS plans on publishing summarized data in the Farm Production Expenditures report on Aug. 3. ERS plans on putting out a report focusing on the ARMS corn and dairy data at a later date. Source - http://www.lanereport.com

24.01.2017

India - Central team takes stock of drought situation

An inter-ministerial central team visited three villages in Madurai district on Monday to assess the damage to crops caused by drought. Director (trade, extension & drought management) at ministry of agriculture Vijay Rajmohan and assistant advisor, ministry of drinking water and sanitation Santosh, along with the managing director of the Tamil Nadu water supply and drainage board, Dheeraj Kumar visited Alampalacheri, Poosalapuram and Kuppalnatham. The officials interacted with farmers and enquired about crop loss. Most of the rain-fed crops in Usilampatti division has suffered extensive damage due to poor rains, a district official told the team. The northeast monsoon should have brought 419mm rainfall but the region received only 70mm rainfall, he added. Explaining about their losses, farmers at Alampalacheri said that they spent 15,000 per acre to cultivate maize, but the entire crop withered. Instead of the 20 quintals of usual yield, they hardly got two quintals of maize. Showing the withered crop at Poosalapuram, farmers said that they had a bumper harvest last year. "Many of us cultivated maize with the hope of good returns this year. But, the drought took a heavy toll. Now, the withered crop is used as cattle feed," S Neethirajan, a farmer, told the team. At Kuppalnatham, the team visited an abandoned paddy field full of withered crops. "We could not raise paddy beyond the planting stage after the rains failed," said N Subramanian, a farmer. Farmers were expecting at least 40 to 50 bags of paddy per acre, he added. The central team queried the farmers about the availability of drinking water in the region. "The region receives drinking water from the Vaigai dam under drinking water schemes. As of now, we are getting water to drink, but the reservoir level is also depleting steadily," a farmer said. When enquired about ground water, farmers said they have to sink bore wells to 400 to 500 feet depth to get water. As the team could not visit Allikundam to study about cotton crop loss, agriculture department officials from Usilampatti presented documents about the status of cotton crop that suffered damage due to drought. Talking to reporters after assessing the drought situation, the central team members said that crops have suffered 80-90 % damage due to water shortage. A report will soon be presented to the central government, they said. District collector K Veera Raghava Rao said drought has affected all 645 villages of the district and a report has been presented to the state government. Revenue and agriculture departments have been asked to assess the crop loss at village level, he added. Source - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com

24.01.2017

Europe - Cold damaging Spanish vineyards and causing cauliflower shortage

The cold continues to trouble farmers in both Spain and Italy. In Spain, grape vineyards were damaged after a brutal snowstorm while Italy expects to see a low supply of cauliflower due to cold freezes around Europe. The Councillor of Water, Agriculture and Environment of Murcia, Adela Martínez Cachá, and the Mayor of Totana, Juan José Cánovas, visited the table grape vineyards in Spain that were damaged in various areas of El Raiguero as a consequence of the snowstorm. The actual extent of the damage, caused mostly by the weight of the snow on the protective plastics, is still unknown, but the acreage of those who have already reported to be affected could exceed sixty hectares. According to the Councillor, technicians of the Regional Agrarian Office have been assessing the damage since last Friday in order to make a financial estimate to be sent to the Ministry of Agriculture, and thus make it possible to determine how much aid will be needed from the administrations. Despite the low amounts of cauliflower harvested elsewhere in Europe, French cauliflower prices remained quite low this week, according to vegetable exporter Theo Kampschoer from Brittany. “For a normal quality cauliflower prices are around 7 euro, and prices are around 9 euro for good quality.” “Supply was very good this week, with a volume of 100,000 to 140,000 crates per day,” Kampschoer continues. “By now we also have cold weather, with temperatures between -2 to 4 degrees Celsius at night, and 5 to 6 degrees Celsius above freezing during the day. That is why we expect slightly less supply in week 4.” Source - http://www.freshplaza.com

24.01.2017

USA - Winter tougher on farmers than plants and animals

A common question I get when the temperatures dip below zero is “Will the extreme cold affect agriculture in any way?” Everyone’s first hope, it seems, is that insect numbers may be down as a result of some sub-zero temperatures. As it turns out, insects are rugged little creatures. Insects that overwinter in our region often take shelter underground or inside plant materials that can moderate the extreme temperatures. Others have adapted by laying eggs capable of surviving months of cold, wet, hot or dry conditions, only to hatch when conditions are favorable for survival. Most plants we commonly use in agriculture have adapted well to our climate. Annuals such as corn and soybeans produce their seeds before the winter temperatures set in. Perennials such as alfalfa have been adapted to survive in our region. In fact, some alfalfa varieties sold in southern portions of the U.S. are perennials in Alabama, but annuals in the North. Fruit trees, particularly peaches and cherries, are perhaps the most sensitive to the cold of any plants we raise in Michiana. Yet, most of the crop loss we see in these fruits occurs in the spring when the buds or flowers are exposed to lower than typical seasonal temperatures. Most animals on modern farms are raised in climate-controlled or moderated environments, which relieve the animal of much of the risk of severe cold injury. Perhaps the biggest risk to livestock in extreme weather is water, or lack thereof. A lactating dairy cow needs 40 to 50 gallons of water a day to maintain production. Imagine the concern a dairy farmer has when pipes freeze and the cows cannot get enough water. It is no wonder that when new barns are built, there is great care to bury the water lines well below the frost line, which is 60 inches deep in our region. When it comes down to it, plants and animals really do fairly well when our temperatures drop below zero. However, the people who care for farm are often put under a great deal of stress: anything from burst water pipes, to frozen manure scrappers and dead batteries. Winter weather may be one reason why only 2 percent of the population farms these days. Source - http://www.agrinews-pubs.com

23.01.2017

India - Note ban has caused loss of Rs 20,000-50,000 per acre, claims famers’ union

India’s cash-driven agri sector continues to reel under the effects of demonetisation, with farmers growing fruits and vegetables suffering “huge losses”, say farm leaders who want the Union budget to “compensate” them for these losses. Amid reports of farmers dumping or refusing to harvest crops like tomatoes and peas due to a crash in prices as traders did not have the cash to purchase the produce, farmer leader Ajay Vir Jakhar said, “Farmers growing perishables like fruits and vegetables have suffered losses of Rs 20,000 to Rs 50,000 per acre on an average. “The loss is huge,” Jakhar, chairman of Bharat Krishak Samaj (Farmers’ Forum, India), told IANS. Explaining the “very bad situation”, farm leader Sudhir Panwar, President of Kisan Jagriti Manch, told IANS: “When the trader says that there is no money to purchase the crop, what is the way out for the farmer? Either sell at throwaway prices or dump the crop.” Fresh produce like vegetables and fruits are sold in cash, he said, adding that the trade remains affected even two-and-a-half-months after the government scrapped higher-value currency notes on November 8. “Cheques are not used. And farmers are not entering into the new economic system (going cashless) that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has proposed. The result is a dip in prices,” added Panwar, also member of the Planning Commission of Uttar Pradesh. According to Jakhar, who is also Editor of agriculture magazines “Farmers’ Forum” and “Krishak Samachar”, “If the cost of harvesting the crop is as much as sowing, then the farmer will not harvest. If a farmer takes his produce to the market, and it is not sold, or the price is very low, he may dump the produce.” “Demonetisation has also severely impacted the future of cooperative banks,” says Jakhar, a farmer from Punjab, adding that “farmers are hoping that Prime Minister Modi will compensate the loss in some way in the Union Budget on February 1”. In the face of criticism that the move to scrap Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes had hit the Rabi sowing season, the government has maintained that, in fact, Rabi sowing (winter crop) acreage had gone up this year. While Panwar noted that the Rabi sowing acreage figures is “data collated by the government”, Jakhar does not think that sowing acreage was impacted due to demonetisation, but he pointed out that “the comparison is with a drought year”. He added that Rabi sowing costs have gone up “and the quality gone down”. “What the government is telling us indirectly through this (higher Rabi sowing figure) is that money is not necessary for sowing,” Panwal said. “Otherwise how could a BJP MP say that the note ban helped farmers to correct their budget, or suggest they were spending money on alcohol, etc.,” he said, referring to BJP MP and Kisan Morcha President Virendra Singh who said earlier this month that the biggest benefit of demonetisation was that it helped farmers avoid “fizul kharchi” (wasteful expenditure). “This means the farmer can fare better without money,” he added, with a touch of sarcasm. For sowing, farmers purchase seeds, and when they do not have cash, they use seeds saved at home. “No good variety of seeds was used this year, or fertiliser. The sale of certified seeds and fertilisers was lower due to the note ban,” said Panwar. “Farmers use inferior or old seeds and less inputs... thus quality is hit,” he says. Demonetisation has not only hit agriculture, but also India’s vast informal sector -- artisans, semi-skilled workers, house construction workers, etc. -- that accounts for around 45 per cent of the GDP and nearly 80 per cent of employment, says Panwar. “The vast informal sector was not paying tax, it is true. But they were providing employment, and wages, and these units in the informal sector have closed down due to the cash limit,” he says. “Now the stand of the government is that no one should operate without paying tax. The main purpose of this exercise (demonetisation) is that. And so, they have shut down their units, and those who were earning wages are now sitting idle.” While the cash situation has eased, the job scenario continues to remain bleak, says Panwar, adding that the note ban effect will be felt for quite some time. Source - http://www.hindustantimes.com

23.01.2017

Australia - Farmers at a loss as flying foxes wreak havoc

NSW Farmers is calling for additional government funding to ensure all growers have the opportunity to combat the influx of flying foxes wreaking havoc for fruit growers across the State. NSW Farmers' Orange Branch Chair Bruce Reynolds said this summer has been particularly hard hit by flying foxes. "We're estimating flying foxes have contributed up to 10% of fruit loss around Orange," Mr Reynolds said. "It's extremely frustrating. Farmers work hard for months putting in a crop and it can be destroyed by flying foxes in just one week. "It also hits consumers' hip pockets because a shortage of supply increases costs. "The NSW Government was funding a successful flying fox netting subsidy but it has been fully committed since March this year, and farmers can no longer apply for the scheme. "The scheme was a partnership between producers and the government, and fruit that has been netted has been saved. "But around 260 hectares of orchards around Orange and Batlow still need to be netted. We want to see every grower granted the opportunity to protect their crops. There's no doubt additional government funding is needed." Netting has proven to be the most environmentally friendly and safest option for flying foxes and growers. "Due to the lack of native food sources, flying foxes are travelling further for food and in large proportions this summer," Mr Reynolds said. "Health experts have also warned about the dangers to human health. "There have been reports of people being bitten and scratched." Source - http://www.northernstar.com.au

23.01.2017

USA - New Farm Bill A Priority For North Dakota Producers

North Dakota farmers and ranchers, struggling against rock bottom crop prices, have their eyes on a new Farm Bill to maintain the federal programs that help keep their operations going in tough times. “There’s a strong sense of need for a 2018 Farm Bill,” said Dale Ihry, executive director of the North Dakota Corn Growers Association. “There’s more emphasis now on needing a Farm Bill when prices are low.” But passage of major legislation, such as the Farm Bill, has proven difficult in recent history. Prior to the 2014 Farm Bill, the last Farm Bill passed was in 2008. To prepare, the corn growers held four meetings in the eastern half of the state last week in an effort to gauge what growers would like to see in U.S. farm policy going into the next presidential administration. These issues will be shared with the corn growers’ national organization to form the group’s policy and lobbying agenda. “There’s just going to be a push in Congress to take a look at another Farm Bill,” Dan Wogsland, executive director of the North Dakota Grain Growers Association, said about his conversations with North Dakota’s congressional delegation, echoing Ihry’s sentiments. At the top of producers’ priority list are tweaks and maintenance of crop insurance, “mainly because we’re such a heavily insured state,” Ihry said. “What we’re hearing from farmers is we have to keep that program to the degree we can." And, hopefully, make it better. One suggestion for improvement is a change in how payments are calculated for the more popular Agriculture Risk Coverage insurance program. The ARC-CO payment structure is based on a particular crop’s average yield in a county. That average yield is combined with the average price for a crop over the previous five marketing years to come up with a revenue guarantee. Payments are triggered if revenue in the county falls below that guarantee. Currently, the U.S. Department of Agriculture ARC uses USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service surveys to determine yields. But commodity organizations say issues with the survey’s sampling methods and criteria result in inaccurate or inconsistent results. “A lot of farmers would like Risk Management Agency yields used,” Ihry said. Because more than 90 percent of farmers are insured under RMA, which requires annual production and yield reporting, results would be more accurate. “The 2014 Farm Bill has had a lot of successes,” Ihry said, pointing to the ARC program which paid out $200 million to North Dakota farmers for the 2014 crop year and $400 million in 2015. Ihry said the concern is whether the program will provide enough protection in the next three years as prices flatline. Should a 2018 Farm Bill get passed, Ihry and Wogsland said they’re operating on the assumption it would involve tweaks to the 2014 legislation, not a major overhaul as seen in the previous bill. Other programs discussed by farmers include the Conservation Reserve Program, wetland management and trade and research programs. Ihry said corn growers discussed whether the current number of acres allowed in CRP — 24 million acres — was too much of a reduction compared to the previous 30 million acres allowed, as acres available for enrollment were in high demand. “A lot tried to get in last time during the sign up,” Ihry said. “Not as many got enrolled as wanted in.” Wogsland said, as half of the wheat grown in North Dakota goes overseas, maintaining dollars for trade programs — particularly the Foreign Market Development Program and the Market Access Program — are priorities. The corn growers is holding its annual convention in Fargo on Feb. 8 and preparing for a national meeting in March. Source - http://www.virginiamn.com

23.01.2017

USA - Country faces huge crop losses if temperatures keep rising

If global temperatures continue to rise, the United States faces big drops in harvests of major food crops by 2100, which may push up global food prices, the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research said. By 2100, if global emissions rise at “business as usual” levels, the world will see twice as many days with temperatures above 30 degrees Celsius (86 degrees Fahrenheit) as it does now, an international team of scientists wrote in the journal Nature Communications. Because crop yields start to drop when temperatures rise above 30 degrees Celsius, that suggests U.S. wheat yields would fall by 20 percent, maize by 50 percent and soybeans by 40 percent by the turn of the century, the scientists found through computer modelling. “If the U.S. has a problem with its yields then world market prices may rise, because the U.S. is such a huge exporter,” co-author of the study Bernhard Schauberger told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. The same crops in other parts of the world are likely to be similarly affected, he said. Irrigation may help protect yields, softening the water stress that causes plants to grow more roots and cut back on producing grain above ground. Plants also close openings in the leaves to prevent water loss, which reduces their intake of carbon dioxide – an essential building material for the crops. More irrigation could help prevent that happening, the scientists said. “Irrigation therefore could be an important means of adaptation to dampen the most severe effects of warming,” said co-author Joshua Elliott from the University of Chicago. “However, this is of course limited by the lack of water resources in some regions,” he added. Ultimately, the best way to protect crop yields is to curb greenhouse gas emissions as agreed under the Paris Agreement on climate change and hold global warming to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times, the scientists said. The agreement, which came into force in November, seeks to phase out most greenhouse gas emissions by the second half of the century. Source: Reuters (Reporting by Alex Whiting @Alexwhi, Editing by Laurie Goering.; Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, climate change, resilience, women’s rights, trafficking and property rights. Source - http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com

23.01.2017

India - Maharashtra govt begins probe into mega crop insurance fraud

The state government has come across major irregularities in insurance claims made by farmers in 2015. Most of these anomalies were reported from Marathwada, which was the worst affected region in the 26 districts hit by drought that year. The state government had disbursed a record Rs 4,205 crore as insurance. The state agriculture department is investigating all insurance claims made by farmers for the kharif and rabi seasons after it came to light that in Beed district alone, Rs 58 crore insurance money that was sanctioned for farmers was claimed illegally and banks had to reverse that amount to the state exchequer. According to a report on the incident, over 15,000 farmers from the district had fraudulently claimed insurance for a larger area of cultivation, or for premium paid for crops they hadn't even sowed. The episode was investigated by Beed collector Naval Kishore Ram when it emerged that the cultivated land shown as insured was much higher than the area available for cultivation in the district. According to the norms, a farmer has to get a crop certificate from the local revenue official (talathi) mentioning the area under cultivation and the crop he will sow before he can get insured for that crop. The premium has to be paid in any of the banks that are authorized by the national agriculture insurance company. In some cases, the farmer would get a crop-sowing certificate from the land revenue officer. A few days later, he would go back to the officer saying he had changed his mind and would be sowing another crop and hence would need another certificate. The farmer would take these two certificates (the earlier one wasn't cancelled) to two different banks and pay the insurance premium for both the crops, but sow only one crop. In these cases, insurance claims were admitted for both the crops. "The talathi has over 1,000 hectares of land under him, and he personally issues these certificates. It is impossible for him to keep track of how many certificates a farmer has taken or if he has inflated the area of his cultivated land on these certificates," said an official from the agriculture department. "There were cases where farmers didn't even cultivate anything and had yet paid up premium for cotton and had received insurance money. Some had registered inflated land areas so that more compensation could be claimed," said an official. Insurance premium that the farmer has to pay is very meagre and the amount depends on the crop and the area under cultivation. Currently, once an agricultural cycle is completed, crop production estimates are made by visiting random fields in one insurance circle, and then extending them to the entire circle. The indemnity levels for availing crop insurance in 2015 were kept at 60%. Principal secretary Bijay Kumar confirmed the incident and said a statewide investigation had been launched as he suspects many such cases have taken place. To avoid such frauds in future, the entire insurance enrolment system will be made online from the coming kharif season in June. "Currently, it is not known which crops are being cultivated on which plot. Once we take the system online, every time the same plot number is entered for issuing crop sowing certificates it will highlight the changes made. Even at the bank-end, once a premium amount has been paid it will figure in the online database," said Kumar. Source - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com

23.01.2017

Insurance Basics: Skin in the Game

Crop insurance is arguably the first farm policy in history that is largely financed by the farmers who benefit from it. Unlike policies of the past, which were 100 percent backed by taxpayers, modern-day farm policy requires growers to take an active role in its funding – a concept sometimes called "skin in the game." The concept may be new to farm policy, but it's not new to insurance. From the earliest shipping insurance at Lloyds of London in the late 1600s to the modern auto policy acquired via a smartphone app, the principal is the same. A customer pays a premium to an insurance company based on the value of property, and predicted risks, to insure its worth. If the property is damaged, the customer absorbs a portion of the loss, called a deductible, and the insurance company covers the remainder through an indemnity payment. The deductible acts as a deterrent to risky behavior and keeps the insurance policy intact for true disasters. Meanwhile, premium dollars help customers pool resources to more cheaply buy protection and fund the system that provides peace of mind. The larger the pool of customers, the more risk can be spread, and the cheaper coverage becomes for all. The same applies to crop insurance, which is why it would be a bad idea to arbitrarily exclude some farmers from participation. Since crop insurance's rise to prominence, famers collectively pay between $3.5 billion and $4 billion a year out of their own pockets in premiums. And they absorb hefty deductibles (on average, 25 percent of loss) when disaster strikes. Famers love the set-up because it offers some predictability for marketing and for borrowing capital, and because it gives them the opportunity to tailor protection to their farms' unique needs. Taxpayers reap the benefits, too. Crop insurance means farmers aren't running to Congress for one-time disaster relief bills every time drought ruins a corn crop in Iowa or frost kills apple trees in New York. No wonder so many are singing crop insurance's praises and calling it their "top priority" as we head into the next Farm Bill debate. Source - http://portal.criticalimpact.com

20.01.2017

Australia - Bats & birds plaguing orchard

Owners of a Glenbernie Orchard at Darkes Forest, Jo and Glenn Fahey, have been troubled by rising losses due to birds and bats. While some have told them this is due to urbanization and a loss of habitat for the animals, they believe it is caused by rising temperatures which are leaving them desperate for food. “In warmer temperatures it is harder to set fruit and the bush trees are not flowering like they used to, so there is less food for bats, birds and bees.” “We’ve never seen the bats in the numbers we have this year, we estimated we are getting about 2000 bats a night,” Jo said. The team grow apples, peaches, nectarines, apricots and raspberries on their 65ha orchard and have claimed that areas without net protection have seen 60-100% losses. “On this farm we have never had bats and birds come under the net, but they are now travelling under the net or through tiny holes because they are desperate for food,” Jo said. Source - weeklytimesnow.com.au

20.01.2017

Australia - New app helps farmers with more efficient irrigation

A new app developed by Horticulture Innovation Australia, in cooperation with the Yield, offers farmers a cheap and easy way to save water and money when irrigating their crops. The app gives an estimate of the crop's water use and soil moisture using area-specific information from the Bureau of Meteorology. In its current form, the tool is mostly attuned towards use with brassicas, carrots, lettuce and leafy vegetables. The app was trialled by a group of growers in Queensland and Tasmania. Rob Salmon, from vegetable seed company Bejo Seeds in Tasmania, said it was raising plenty of questions about evapotranspiration or dealing with water that escaped from a plant. Developers are currently modifying the app to include a function that estimates the level of evapotranspiration seven days in advance. "We need to better understand how much we can deficit irrigate," he said. "So if the literature says this crop needs 40 millimetres of rain, or 40 millimetres of irrigation, can you get 90 per cent of the expected yield if you put on 75 per cent of that irrigation? In this case we're trying to match the supply with the demand of the plant." Source - abc.net.au

759
of 1173