NEWS
961
of 1221
News
24.03.2015

Argentina - Rain hampers lemon campaign

Heavy rains and hailstorms are threatening to derail the start of the 2015 lemon season in the Argentine region of Tucumán. A representative from the Obispo Colombres Agroindustrial Experimental Station (EEAOC) told that in addition to the possible direct impact of the hail on the quality and quantity of this year’s citrus crop, the higher-than-average precipitation levels meant production would be more susceptible to disease, particularly in central and southern areas.“For this reason, the losses are more likely to be reflected in terms of damage to fruit quality rather than the overall crop volume,” the station said. “We urge producers to be extra vigilant when it comes to the application of fungicides.”EEAOC noted that access routes to farms were also being hampered with the delays to harvesting likely to result in oversized fruit and deteriorating quality. It said a number of farms had also been damaged by rivers overflowing their banks and depositing mud and stilt in groves.The 2015 Argentine lemon crop is already expected to be 15-20 per lighter than in a normal year due to the lasting effects of the 2013 freeze. The quality seal for exported lemons from Argentina, trees have yet to recover biologically from the worst frosts the region has seen in 50 years, which were followed by a period of drought in spring 2013/summer 2014 resulting in a 60 per cent fall in output last year. Together with the recent devaluation of the euro and rouble, the industry is braced for what is set to be yet another challenging export season.Source - http://www.fruitnet.com/

24.03.2015

Pakistan - Climate change blamed as erratic downpours hit harvests

Anxious farmers in Pakistan waited for weeks for the rains to arrive – but when the skies finally opened, the downpour was so intense it destroyed crops and put the harvest in jeopardy.“We weather scientists are really in shock, and so are farmers, who have suffered economic losses due to crop damage,” says Muzammil Hussain, a weather forecasting scientist at the Pakistan Meteorological Department (PMD).“The wind from the southeast has carried moisture from the Arabian Sea. Normally, the northeast wind brings rain during winter, and the southeast wind brings monsoon rains in summer. But the pattern has changed this year because of what is believed to be global warming.”Farmers across much of Pakistan plant winter crops of wheat, oilseed and potato late in the year and wait for rains to water the land.This year, the rains arrived more than three weeks late and were unusually heavy, accompanied by violent hailstorms. Along with the rains, temperatures also dropped.Ibrahim Mughal, chairman of the Pakistan Agri Forum, says excessive moisture due to heavy bouts of late rain is likely to lead to outbreaks of fungus on crops, and production could be halved.“If the rains come a month ahead of the harvesting time [April to mid-May], it is always disastrous,” he says. “It can hit production for a crop such as wheat by between 20% and 30%, and if the rain is accompanied by hailstorms and winds then the losses can escalate to more than 50%.”Arif Mahmood, a former director general at PMD, says the onset of winter across much of Pakistan is being delayed by two to three days every year, and there is an urgent need for farmers to adapt to such changes.“Over recent years, winter has been delayed by 25 to 30 days, and also the intensity of the cold has increased, which has affected almost every field of life − from agriculture to urban life.”This year has also been marked by abrupt changes in temperature. Ghulam Rasul, a senior scientist at PMD, says big swings in temperature are likely to add to the problems being faced by millions of farmers in Pakistan.“The average temperature during the first two weeks [of March] was between 11 and 13 degrees Celsius, but now it’s on a continuous upward trend and has reached 26˚C over the space of two days,” he reports.“The winter rains in the north and central area of Pakistan, and the sudden rise and fall in temperature, are related to climate change.”Serious damageSimilar storms and late winter rains have also caused serious damage across large areas of northern India.The states of Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra – the two most populous states in the country – have been particularly badly hit.In Maharashtra, snow and landslides have blocked roads and cut off towns and villages.In Uttar Pradesh, there are fears that more than 50% of the wheat crop has been lost in the eastern part of the state.Source - http://www.rtcc.org/

23.03.2015

USA - Crop insurance may not cover losses

The Government Accountability Office released “Crop Insurance: In Areas with Higher Crop Production Risks, Costs Are Greater and Premiums May Not Cover Expected Losses” on March 10.GAO indicated that, “The federal government’s crop insurance costs are substantially higher in areas with higher crop production risks (e.g., drought risk) than in other areas. In the higher risk areas, government costs per dollar of crop value for 2005 through 2013 were over two and a half times the costs in other areas.”However, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Risk Management Agency—the agency that administers the crop insurance program—does not monitor and report on the government’s crop insurance costs in the higher risk areas.The report added that, “RMA implemented changes to premium rates in 2014, decreasing some rates and increasing others, but GAO’s analysis of RMA data shows that, for some crops, RMA’s higher risk premium rates may not cover expected losses. RMA made changes to premium rates from 2013 to 2014, but it plans to phase in changes to premium rates over time could have implications for improving actuarial soundness. USDA is required by statute to limit annual increases in premium rates to 20 percent of what the farmer paid for the same coverage in the previous year.“However, GAO found that, for higher risk premium rates that required an increase of at least 20 percent to cover expected losses, RMA did not raise these premium rates as high as the law allows to make the rates more actuarially sound. Without sufficient increases to premium rates, where applicable, RMA may not fully cover expected losses and make the rates more actuarially sound. Furthermore, in analyzing data on premium dollars for 2013, GAO found that had RMA’s higher risk premium rates been more actuarially sound, the federal government could have potentially collected tens of millions of dollars in additional premiums.”The GAO report noted that, “The federal government’s crop insurance costs generally increased for fiscal years 2003 through 2013. A widespread drought and crop losses in crop year 2012 contributed to the spike in government costs to $14.1 billion in fiscal year 2012. In crop year 2013, weather conditions were more favorable, so government costs were lower than in fiscal year 2012. According to an April 2014 CBO estimate, for fiscal years 2014 through 2023, program costs are expected to average $8.9 billion annually.”The GAO report also noted that, “all 2,554 counties that had county target premium rates for at least one of the five major crops.”In addition, GAO noted the riskiest 20 percent of counties in terms of average county target premium rates. These 510 higher risk counties had the highest 2013 premium dollars to show which counties purchased the most crop insurance. The Great Plains, which has areas with relatively high drought risk, had a large portion of the higher risk counties’ premium dollars.And, GAO added this “compares the estimated government crop insurance costs per dollar of expected crop value for the five major crops in the 510 higher risk counties with the costs in the 2,044 other U.S. counties from 2005 through 2013. Total government crop insurance costs vary from year to year depending on weather-caused crop losses, crop prices and farmers’ decisions about how much insurance coverage to purchase.“To control for variations in crop prices and farmers’ purchase decisions, and to normalize the costs for higher risk counties and lower risk counties while still reflecting weather-caused crop losses, we expressed the estimated government costs in relation to expected crop value. Over the 9-year time frame, government costs averaged 14 cents per dollar of expected crop value in the higher risk counties and 5 cents per dollar in the other counties.“For example, if two farms each had an expected crop value of $1 million, the higher risk farm would have had an average annual government cost of $140,000, and the lower risk farm would have had an average annual government cost of $50,000. In 2013, the higher risk counties had a government cost of 17 cents per $1 of expected crop value, 3 cents higher than the average during the time frame, and the other counties had a government cost of 5 cents per $1 of expected crop value, the same as the time frame average.”The GAO report included two recommendations:“GAO recommends that RMA one, monitor and report on crop insurance costs in areas that have higher crop production risks and two, as appropriate, increase its adjustments of premium rates in these areas by as much as the full 20 percent annually that is allowed by law.“RMA disagreed with GAO’s first recommendation and agreed with the second. GAO continues to believe that RMA can and should do more to monitor and report on crop insurance costs in higher risk areas, where government costs were found to be substantially higher.”Source - http://www.hpj.com/

23.03.2015

USA - Crop conditions: South Texas agriculture under serious weather threat

For the second year in a row, cold wet weather is hampering the Lower Rio Grande Valley’s billion dollar agricultural industry, only this year the prolonged conditions are posing a much more serious threat, according to Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service experts.Cotton and sugarcane, two of the area’s most lucrative crops, are currently among those most threatened, according to Brad Cowan, AgriLife Extension agent in Hidalgo County.“Our row crops are getting to the point where this weather is really going to cause our growers the loss of major dollars if it doesn’t turn around here pretty quickly,” Cowan said. “Our cotton growers are the ones who need some drying-out weather really fast.”Without the ability to get into soggy fields to plant their 2015 crop soon, cotton growers face two major challenges: harvesting before the state-mandated Sept. 1 deadline and meeting planting deadlines for adequate crop insurance, Cowan said.“If cotton isn’t planted soon, we run up against deadlines where it won’t be harvested in time for the boll weevil to be managed at the end of the crop,” he said. “The other concern is being able to insure the crop properly. It’s really a serious time for our cotton guys to hopefully get some warmer and dryer weather in here so we can get this crop into the ground.”Cowan said he and others will appeal to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Risk Management Agency, which manages the federal crop insurance program, for an extension of the planting deadline.While rain is usually a welcome respite for agriculture, too much of a good thing can be bad, especially when coupled with cold weather, Cowan said.“We have been wet, wet, wet,” he said. “And what’s made it bad is that it’s been both wet and cold. Either, at the wrong time, is bad; but together, it’s serious business.”While wet weather keeps growers out of their fields, colder than normal soil temperatures don’t allow seeds to germinate and grow properly.“Corn and soybeans can take cold, but other row crops like cotton and grain need warm soil temperatures here as early as January,” Cowan said. “That’s why corn does so well in Minnesota and other cold climates.”Sugarcane is under threat of losing significant yields if fields don’t dry up sufficiently for mechanized harvesters to take the ratoon crop to the state’s only sugarmill, in Monte Alto, for processing.“Our sugarcane harvest is shut down at the moment, and they really need to get back in there and get that crop out,” Cowan said. “There have also been growers trying to get sugarcane planted since September, so we’re behind in all of that too.”Unplanted and late-harvested sugarcane could result in drastic yield losses, he said.“Sugarcane will get harvested eventually, but it will be late, which will be lots of lost dollars to growers and the economy. We’d like to get the entire crop into the mill by the first of April, but at this rate it will likely be well into the summer before that happens.”The cold, wet weather conditions have also caused problems for the area’s winter vegetable crops,Cowan said. Especially hard hit are onions, which prefer hot, dry weather.Beginning in September, the four-county Lower Rio Grande Valley area has seen unusually high rainfall amounts and cooler than normal temperatures, according to a summary released by the National Weather Service in Brownsville.Citing an El Niño weather pattern that officially gained footing at the end of February, the report notes that March rains have added to already exceptionally moist conditions, ensuring no return to drought conditions anytime soon.“The expectation for the current weather pattern to continue through spring ensures that drought has no chance to become established through May, and ensures no spring wildfire season for the lower and mid-Valley and only minimal opportunity for the Rio Grande Plains of Starr, Jim Hogg and Zapata counties,” the report states.The report also forecasts that the subtropical jet, a feature common to El Niño, suggests lower-than-normal temperatures through late March and a continued threat for more showers and eventually thunderstorms.But the cool wet weather is not all bad news, Cowan said.“Rain is always good for our soil conditions and helps avoid depletion of our reservoirs at Amistad and Falcon dams,” he said. “But it’s also great news for beef cattle and growing pastures here in South Texas.“Corn and soybeans are off to a good start, though we didn’t plant as much as we would have liked. Sesame planting can wait for warmer weather, and it’s not too late to plant. And more will be planted, pending dryer field conditions.”Cowan said lighter, sandy soil fields can dry out sufficiently for cotton planters in as little as two days of warm, sunny weather, while heavier clay soils require a week to 10 days.Source - http://www.valleymorningstar.com/

23.03.2015

India - Farmers to get double relief for crop damage

The farmers who sustained more than 50% damage to their crops in Pilibhit district due to untimely rain recently will now get double compensation as against what was announcement previously by the state government. These farmers will be provided with additional amount of reparation from central government's pool which will be on a par with compensation amount being awarded to farmers by the state government.A decision to the effect was taken by the state authorities and communicated to the district administration on Friday evening via video-conferencing by chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh Alok Ranjan. The district revenue department has completed the survey of damage to crops and the additional requisition of funds in accordance with the newly subsumed provisions is expected to be sent to the state administration on Monday.Alok Singh, the additional district magistrate (finance and revenue), told TOI that according to the survey of revenue department, more than 50% of standing crops, especially wheat, mustard and rapseed, in a an area spanning a total of 4288.26 hectare was damaged. The maximum damage has been reported in Bisalpur tehsil area where 2610 hectare area was adversely affected by rain and hailstorm while the least damage was found in Pilibhit tehsil, where crops sustained damage in 56.212 hectare. The Puranpur tehsil area recorded decimation of crops in 1622.048 hectare area.Source - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/

23.03.2015

India - Resolution on crop insurance scheme soon

Telangana Minister for Agriculture Pocharam Srinivas Reddy on Friday stated that a resolution would be adopted in both the Houses of Legislature next week, requesting the Centre to implement the crop insurance scheme with farmer as a unit.The crop insurance scheme is being implemented with village as unit now against the mandal as unit in the past.Loss suffered by farmers has come down with village as unit, implementation of the scheme with farmer as a unit will benefit the farmers further.Source - http://www.thehindu.com/

23.03.2015

India - Monetary support to States to have own crop insurance schemes

Keeping in view the requirements and agro-climatic conditions specific to each region, State Governments have been given the flexibility to develop suitable products for consideration and approval of the Central Government.Central Government is providing monetary support under Crop Insurance Schemes in the form of premium subsidy between 40% to 75% in respect of Modified National Agricultural Insurance Scheme, Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme and Coconut Palm Insurance Scheme. Under National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS), premium subsidy is provided to only small & marginal farmers up to 10% of the premium. Besides, under NAIS claims are paid by the Government over and above the premium amount. The benefit of premium subsidy and claim payment is applicable to all insured farmers of all States/UTs including the farmers of Vidarbha region.Source - http://www.business-standard.com/

23.03.2015

Украина - Аграрии Запорожской области констатируют отсутствие всходов озимых зерновых на 2 тыс. га

Сельскохозяйственные предприятия Запорожской области констатируют отсутствие всходов посеянных под урожай 2015 года озимых зерновых культур на площади около 2 тыс. га.Об этом говорится в сообщении департамента агропромышленного развития областной государственной администрации.Отмечается, что ранее потепление с 10 марта положительно повлияло на состояние озимых и возобновление вегетации пшеницы.По данным ведомства на 19 марта, всходы озимых получены на площади 669 тыс. га или 99,7% от засеянных.Из них в хорошем и удовлетворительном состоянии находится 597,6 тыс. га (89,3%), в слабом и сжиженном состоянии - 71,7 тыс. га (10,7%).Как сообщало агентство, в конце февраля аграрии Запорожской области прогнозировали неудовлетворительное состояние 70 тыс. га всходов озимых и констатировали отсутствие всходов на 12 тыс. га.Аграрии Запорожской области намерены посеять 0,9 млн га яровых под урожай-2015.В конце ноября 2014 года аграрии Запорожской области завершили сев озимых под урожай 2015 года, засеяв 0,7 млн га.Источник - http://agronews.ua/

23.03.2015

Philippines - More farmers availed of crop insurance in 2014

Enrollees in the government’s crop-insurance program rose by 24.3 percent to 924,343 in 2014, from 743,589 recorded in the previous year, the Philippine Crop Insurance Corp. (PCIC) said over the weekend.PCIC, a government-owned and -controlled corporation (GOCC) under the Department of Agriculture (DA), said rice, corn and high-value crop farmers covered by its insurance program expanded in size to 778,375 hectares ,or 53.82 percent higher compared to the 2013 data. Insured livestock also rose sixfold to 500,568 in 2014.“The [agency] paid out a total of about P734.97 million in insurance claims to 99,335 farmers and fishermen. The amount is 48.4 percent higher than in 2013,” PCIC President Jovy Bernabe said in a statement.PCIC said 70 percent of farmers and fishermen who were given insurance protection last year were granted free coverage under various government programs such as the provision of insurance to those listed in the Department of Budget and Management’s Registry System for Basic Sectors in Agriculture.The government also provided free agricultural insurance to Supertyphoon Yolanda-affected areas, selected agrarian-reform beneficiaries, and farmers covered by the DA-Land Bank of the Philippines’s Sikat-Saka Program.Agriculture Secretary Proceso J. Alcala said the government has stepped up the implementation of its crop-insurance program to help farmers cope with the destructive effects of climate change.“In these times of unpredictable weather patterns and extreme weather events, insurance for crops and even livestock is indispensable to protect farmers and fishermen from the risks of disasters,” Alcala said.Despite the increase in enrollees, PCIC admits that it has yet to reach farmers and fishermen in remote areas.“Many are actually not even aware about [the government’s] insurance systems,” Bernabe said.PCIC said its periodic review of its insurance program resulted in the development of products with discounted premium rates for swine and poultry growers last year.“Most of the time, farmers opt not to increase the amount of cover or even obtain cover that is less the production cost in order to avoid additional premium cost. This explains why PCIC can only provide cover that is worth less than the average production cost to most borrower-insured farmers,” Bernabe said.“However, they actually have the option to increase the amount of cover up to additional 20 percent of cost of production inputs, as portion of the expected yield,” he added.According to PCIC, the premium cost under the regular rice and corn-insurance programs is partially subsidized to about 55 percent and the balance is shared by the farmer and the PCIC-accredited lending institution as underwriter.The underwriter and the borrowing farmer agree on terms and conditions, including amount of loan and amount of cover before the issuance of insurance policy.“The PCIC would always encourage farmers to insure their farms at a higher amount of cover, but this decision ultimately rests with the farmers and the lending institution,” Bernabe also said.Meanwhile, Bernabe said the GOCC is looking at the possibility of expanding its offerings to other insurance lines such as life and accident insurance and to float bonds to generate internal funds, saying PCIC’s charter allows it to do so.Source - http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/

23.03.2015

Australia - Severe storms ravage cotton crops in northern New South Wales

Cotton and sorghum growers are counting their losses as they begin the clean up from a severe storm which brought winds of up to 150 kilometres an hour and dropped hailstones the size of cricket balls at Narrabri and areas east of Moree on Saturday afternoon.Some cotton crops were completely wiped out, while others suffered severe hail damage.Sorghum farmers who were expected to begin harvest in the next few weeks will reassess whether crops are worth harvesting.The winds brought down trees and ripped through sheds, while hailstones pelted down damaging houses, cars and machinery.At least two horses were killed and many more injured, along with birds and native wildlife.Between 600 and 700 hectares of cotton has varying degrees of damage, according to Cotton Seed Distributors extension and development agronomist Robert Eveleigh."Some crops are wiped out, but then there are some that have minimal damage," he said."This is the worst late-season hail we've seen for many years. It's at the stage where everybody has spent all their money on the crop except for picking."Cotton grower Lach Melbourne, "Noonameena", Narrabri, had about 40pc of his crop damaged from hail a few weeks ago - now he's looking at 90pc of the crop with hail damage."We would have started picking this weekend and the second defoliation was to go on today," Mr Melbourne said.The same storm hit areas east of Moree, with some farmers near Pallamallawa dubbing the event Cyclone Pally.Moree consultant Brad Cogan, Cogan Agronomic Services, said late mung beans had also been affected near Moree, along with cotton and sorghum."It was from Terry Hie Hie all the way through to Pallamallawa and then through Croppa Creek and North Star, so it's a big summer crop area," he said."There's definitely some significant crop yield loss, as well as damages to sheds, silos, field bins, houses, vehicles, augers and fences."Farmers in the Moree area received between 25mm and 85mm, giving them a silver lining for winter crops."From a soil moisture profile perspective the end result there is pretty good, but it'd be much better if it was from here to Walgett."Source - http://www.theland.com.au/

20.03.2015

India - Farmers suffered 100% losses

Agriculture Minister Om Prakash Dhankar said his office had been receiving reports from across state that the recent rain and hailstorm caused 50-100% losses to state farmers.Talking at Chaudhary Ranbir Singh University, Jind, Dhankar said, “Though crop damage assessment is going on across the state, we have received reports that in some areas, farmers have suffered 100% losses as rain and hailstorm damaged their crop. Our officials are quickly assessing the required compensation that has to be given to affected farmers.”He advised state farmers to benefit from crop insurance and get their crops insured every year. “We will provide maximum compensation to our farmers. Though we have not sought any special package for Haryana farmers from the Centre, but we will arrange all required funds on our own,” Dhankar said.Source - http://www.tribuneindia.com/

20.03.2015

Vanuatu - The devastated agricultural sector fears serious shortages

Pam cyclone destroyed all food crops and severe shortages are expected if the archipelago is not rescued in food aid.The cyclone disfigured landscapes, destroyed homes and infrastructure and devastated crops. Local producers who marketed avocados, yams, mangoes, coconuts, bananas, papayas and other tropical fruits in the central market of the capital have nothing to sell. No bananas, no fruit, nothing.Before the hurricane, the population had stocks of food but no point of sale could not be replenished. It remains in the grocery stores a few cans and packets of biscuits but no sugar or coffee or milk.A first report on the state of agriculture is disquieting: 100% of crops are devastated on the island of Port-Vila (the capital), only Santo and Malekula Islands are spared. Thus the archipelago now depends on two islands for food.The problem seems impossible to solve without outside food aid. Knowing that it takes 6 months for potatoes and cassava are maturing and 1 month for cabbage (cabbage Kanak and Chinese cabbage), but must still have seeds available.Source - http://www.blackseagrain.net/

20.03.2015

India - The answer to crop damage is better insurance, not handouts

Unseasonal rain and windy weather have caused widespread damage to an estimated 50 lakh hectares of rabi crop in north and central India. A familiar set of events has started to unfold: State governments are demanding large grants from the Centre and politicians are outdoing each other in speaking for farmers. While the damage is serious and calls for immediate redressal, the underlying problem is a totally inadequate crop insurance system.The Punjab government, while placing a demand for ₹700 crore from the Centre, has rejected the prevailing insurance formula that focuses on crop damage rather than the additional costs incurred on saving it as a result of calamitous weather. While there is no denying the growing sophistication of crop insurance products, several design issues remain. As yield-based insurance, one that covers all eventualities by focusing only on the outcome, suffers from implementation issues, we have moved towards specific forms of risk cover such as weather-based crop insurance schemes. Now, the time has come to make the next shift — to instruments that cover cost and pricing risks as well. This shift would require a range of products and players and a higher level of actuarial expertise. The passage of the Insurance Bill can help the cause of crop insurance, provided the government works in that direction.The existing weather- and yield-based systems have a common problem: they take the area and not the individual as a unit. While an area-based approach brings down the operational costs of insurers, it does not represent the manner in which crop damage actually occurs. Therefore, in a single village, the damage could vary from extreme cases to insignificant ones, for which an average norm, whether based on yield or weather, can be cruelly unfair to some. If products are to be tailored to cover for a range of risks as well as reach out to the individual, premiums will rise. The key issue, therefore, is to make crop insurance, a crucial economic service, viable.A premium of about 10 per cent of the total crop value is way higher than, say, the cost of insurance for a car. This is because risk is intrinsically high in agriculture (which makes it worthy of insurance!); this results in an adverse claims-to-premium ratio of 3.3. Insurance coverage should extend beyond 15 to 20 per cent of farmers who tap the formal banking system. About 80 per cent of India’s small and marginal farmers who are financially excluded should also come under the insurance umbrella, reducing costs for all. To this end, insurance coverage should be linked to the microfinance and SHG network, with the RBI and IRDA working out the rules. The Centre and States will have to continue subsidising premium, while extending a similar benefit to private players. Crop insurance is too important a matter to be remembered only when a squall or drought occurs.Source - http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/

20.03.2015

Canada - Saskatchewan budgets $240 million in 2015-16 for farm risk management programs

Claims under the Saskatchewan’s Provincial Disaster Assistance Program are contributing to higher-than budgeted overall government spending this year, while lower-than-budged crop insurance claims are the main reason agriculture spending will be $44 million lower than expected in 2014-15, the provincial government announced Wednesday. Meanwhile, the 2015-16 budget, tabled Wednesday by Finance Minister Ken Krawetz, includes $240 million to fund business risk management programs - including crop insurance - for farmers. "The 2015-16 Agriculture Budget also contains $240 million to fully fund business risk management programs such as Crop Insurance, AgriStability and AgriInvest to support farming operations as they look to grow and expand," the provincial government said in a backgrounder. "The 2015 Crop Insurance Program includes ongoing enhancements giving producers more choice and flexibility. As well, Crop Insurance premiums are decreasing for producers while coverage levels, on average, are increasing to $183 per acre, up from $162 per acre in 2014." AgriStability is "a margin-based program that provides income support when a producer experiences larger income losses," Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corp. says on its website. Under the Growing Forward 2 agreement between Ottawa and the provinces, which covers 2013 through 2018, costs are shared by the federal and provincial governments. AgriInvest is a federal program that lets producers "set money aside which can be used to recover from small income shortfalls, or to make investments to reduce on-farm risks." Source - http://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/

20.03.2015

Australia - Remote cattle stations spared, but banana farm 'devastated' by double Cyclone Nathan hit

Cattle stations in far north Queensland may have been spared significant damage from Cyclone Nathan, but at least one commercial banana farm has suffered significant crop losses.Nathan made landfall as a Category 4 cyclone near Cape Melville this morning, with wind gusts up to 220 kilometres per hour recorded.The Hope Vale banana farm, located 100 kilometres south of where the cyclone crossed, was hit by the system for a second time in just over a week, resulting in fruit damage.Manager of the Hope Vale Foundation, Ken Reid, said while the latest crop loss was devastating, it could have been much worse."On a whole I'm quite surprised that the farm held up the way it did," he said."I guess that's full credit to the guys in preparations leading up to the blow, with de-leafing and stringing and all that sort of stuff."We had a few volunteers down there as well from the community, so everyone chipped in."But we lost 15 per cent when Nathan hovered off the coast last week, and now it is probably up to 30 per cent by the look of it."So quite devastating, but essentially we still have fruit hanging on the trees that's going to be pickable on Monday."Hopefully we can still get a little bit of fruit out next week, and fully assess what the total damage is."Remote cattle stations spared major damageGlen Sheppard, from Lillyvale Station on Princess Charlotte Bay, told ABC Rural his property had sustained little damage despite being in the direct path of the storm."Everything is ok at the moment, there's a bit of a breeze around but nothing too serious," he said."We haven't had a lot of rain through the night, maybe five or six millimetres, and it is trying to rain now. But yeah, we expected it to be a lot worse."Maybe it's only early days, but yeah, it is pretty tame."Further south at Kings Plains Station, grazier Daryl Paradise said the cyclone was delivering steady rainfall across his property."We've had 25 millimetres since six o'clock this morning, and it is still raining very heavily here now," he said."And it looks like it might carry on for a bit longer. I see the rain band on the television with that cyclone, looks like it might supply a bit more rain for us today."It started raining at two o'clock this morning, but we had no wind to speak of here."We were pretty well prepared, because when Nathan came in before and dropped some rain, we'd already put all the cattle into the high country, and opened up gates here and there, gave them access if they needed to get out."If we can get this rain now, it will give us a reasonable season. It will be quite a long way ahead of last year."Source - http://www.abc.net.au/

19.03.2015

Africa - Agriculture: increase water harvesting

Ensuring that the world's food needs are met by 2050 will take a doubling of global food production. To improve agricultural yields on that scale will require a radical rethink of global water-management strategies and policies.Sub-Saharan Africa is the epicentre of this challenge. The region's population is set to more than double by 2050 to almost 2.5 billion, or 25% of the world's projected population. Half of its current one billion inhabitants lives in extreme poverty, one-quarter is undernourished, and one-fifth faces serious water shortages. Although almost two-thirds of the population are rural, agriculture on much of the land is limited by scarce, variable and unpredictable water resources.Ninety-five per cent of sub-Saharan agriculture depends on 'green water': moisture from rain held in the soil. In large parts of the continent, most rain evaporates before it generates 'blue water', or run-off, so little of it recharges rivers, lakes and groundwater. Most farming communities are a long way from rivers and cannot use irrigation. Arid deserts and semi-arid savannahs comprise 40% of the region's land area. These receive too little surface run-off (less than 100 millimetres a year) to grow maize (corn), rice, millet and sorghum (which requires at least 400 mm per year) using irrigation alone. Future rainfall will be more variable and could be 25% lower in many semi-arid regions if average global temperatures warm by 2 °C above pre-industrial levels.Management of green water for rain-fed, small-scale farming is integral to eradicating hunger. But it is missing from the draft United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which will be agreed in September. A dedicated water goal that includes science-based targets and indicators is essential and must receive attention during the SDG negotiations in New York next week, in the wake of the World Water Day on 22 March.We propose an approach for the SDG goal that will improve water security, address hunger and poverty and enhance carbon storage. Retaining more rainwater in soils and storing run-off would bridge dry spells that last weeks, the major challenge to rain-fed food production. For longer droughts, social and economic strategies are needed to assure food security.Untapped potentialWater flows across the SDGs — from improving water, sanitation and health to ending hunger and poverty. But there has been no discussion so far about how water resources should be managed to meet the aims. The goals are vague and assume — as have global water policies for decades — that water for all needs can be drawn from rivers, lakes and groundwater.This blue-water bias stems from the modernization of water infrastructure starting in the 1950s, when most dams and pumping stations were built. Since then, water management has been viewed mainly as an engineering challenge. Conventional green-water practices, such as soil and water conservation and water harvesting, are seeing a resurgence worldwide in areas where irrigation is impractical. But the importance of supporting rain-fed agriculture has not yet been translated into investment strategies and policies for development.Regions in which irrigation is not viable include highly populated places such as Africa's Sahel region, northern China and central India. In sub-Saharan Africa, almost 500 million people live in dry zones — deserts, grasslands and bush savannahs — in countries such as Mali, Niger and Zimbabwe. Another 245 million live in slightly wetter zones with forest savannahs, for example in large parts of Tanzania and Zambia, where run-off is still too low to irrigate fields (see 'African drylands'). In any case, river water is needed mainly for urban, industrial and energy needs.When crops fail, the reason is usually an extended dry spell, or one at a crucial point in the growing season, such as the flowering period, rather than low rainfall. Several weeks without rain are common and may occur each season, sometimes with a devastating effect. In 2000, when an early onset of the rainy season followed by 6–9 weeks without rain prevented staple crops such as maize from growing in Kenya, 4 million people across the country faced severe food shortages.Rainfall is becoming more erratic. Zambia, Malawi and Zimbabwe have experienced later rainy seasons, longer dry spells and fewer rainy days over the past 50 years than before. The cause is uncertain but may be linked to anthropogenic climate change.Water losses compound the difficulties of farming in dry tropical regions. Field research shows that 50–70% of rainfall does not reach crops but evaporates or becomes surface run-off (causing soil erosion), recharging water tables (see 'Sub-Saharan water balance'). Guiding more water to the root zone would dramatically improve food production.Water harvestingGreen water can be retained in three ways: collecting run-off; improving the infiltration of rain in soils; and managing land, water and crops across watersheds to increase water storage in soils, wetlands and the water table.Small-scale water harvesting methods include terracing to conserve soil moisture, as in the famous Fanya-juu terraces of Machakos, Kenya; or using dams and ditches to channel run-off into fields, as widely used in Eritrea and Israel. Storage systems such as ponds, tanks and sub-surface storage in sand and soil, used in places such as northern Mexico, Ethiopia, Sudan and India, offer another approach. Together these systems can hold the equivalent of a few rainy-season deluges, enough to bridge month-long dry spells.Water harvesting has been introduced to several parts of Africa, including Kenya and Tanzania, since the 1980s by non-governmental and development organizations including the UN. It has improved the stability of crop yields and can raise productivity from 1 tonne per hectare to 3–4 tonnes.The technique is also proven elsewhere. In India, some state governments and community organizations have revived water-harvesting methods. The state of Karnataka has in all its 30 districts piloted integrated land and water management — including water harvesting — raising crop productivity. Dams, gullies and ponds combined with improved water, nutrient and crop management have increased Indian crop yields from around 1 tonne per hectare to 5 tonnes. China's arid Gansu province supplies water to the homes of 2 million people using small, spherical sub-surface tanks to collect rainwater, and is increasingly using water harvesting in agriculture.Soil, nutrient and crop-management strategies are also needed to boost yields. One of the most promising practices is abandoning the plough, which has proven to be an effective way of burning soil carbon — by exposing it to sun and oxygen — causing emissions of carbon dioxide. Ploughing compacts and encrusts the soil, preventing rain from infiltrating and increasing run-off. Conservation tillage instead avoids turning the soil to allow its structure and microorganisms to build up.Applied to the world's croplands, conservation tillage could increase carbon uptake by 1 gigatonne of carbon per year, or one-ninth of current global emissions. It would have three benefits: mitigating climate change; increasing crop yields by adding green water; and reducing soil degradation through lower surface run-off. Used on more than one-third of US farmland, such methods are increasingly being adopted in Africa, for example in Ethiopia, Zambia and Zimbabwe.Mulches and canopy cover cut evaporation. The limiting factor is the extremely nutrient-poor soils across savannah farming systems, particularly in Africa. Nutrients can be added through fertilizers, manure and composts. Raising nutrient applications from the current African average of less than 10 kilograms of nitrogen and phosphorus per hectare per year to 50–100 kg (still less than the global average) could boost productivity many times over.Green-water-management strategies need to span scales — from fields to watersheds and river basins. Diverse sets of ecosystems should be protected to dampen the effects of flash floods and encourage underground flows to avoid erosion from run-off. Wetlands, meandering rivers, forests and patchy landscapes are natural capital assets that build resilience.Watershed and river-basin management also protect local rainfall. Much tropical rain is convective — clouds produced from rising vapour over forests generate rain downwind. For instance, moisture from the West African rainforests in the south causes rain to fall on the semi-arid savannah in the north.Food securityRapid population growth however means that even with the most optimistic yield improvements it is unlikely that Africa will be self-sufficient in food by 2050. Particularly at risk are countries in the Sahel region, northern Africa and the Horn of Africa.Food trade will be necessary to supplement crop growth for at least 30 African nations. This calls for economic development — industries supported by blue water — to generate purchasing power. Regional economic policies that protect national food production while facilitating food trade will be needed. Emergency responses will also be required to cope with inevitable crop failure. These could include resilience strategies such as social-security systems, cereal banks and insurance to compensate farmers for crop failure.Sustainable development of sub-Saharan Africa needs to be based on a fine balance of blue and green water: blue water for urbanization, industrialization and energy development, and green water for food and biomass production.The SDG framework should reflect this integrated water agenda. A specific target on sustainable management of rainfall for ecosystems and food production in water-scarce regions of the world is necessary to fulfil the goals on eradicating hunger and poverty and enabling long-term economic development.Large institutions and foundations that invest in African development, such as the African Development Bank, the World Bank and the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa initiative, should invest in capacity development, planning and infrastructure development for small-scale water harvesting systems. The costs are large: investments of around US$10 billion to $20 billion per year for 10–15 years would be needed, comparable with those for basic sanitation, infrastructure and water supply. But they offer returns in terms of development and resilience.National governments need policy shifts. Water and agriculture are typically handled by separate ministries. Water and food need to be integrated and managed in the same political sphere, preferably together with the environment, to enable sustainable and efficient blue- and green-water management in agricultural ecosystems and landscapes.Hiding the African Achilles' heel of water scarcity behind unclear wording in the SDGs is a grave mistake. Without connecting water, food, growth and poverty, the sustainable development framework will not deliver on its promise to Africa.Source - http://www.nature.com/

961
of 1221